scholarly journals High‐risk transcriptional profiles in multiple myeloma are an acquired feature that can occur in any subtype and more frequently with each subsequent relapse

Author(s):  
Eileen M. Boyle ◽  
Adam Rosenthal ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Philip Farmer ◽  
Michael Rutherford ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e046225
Author(s):  
Sarah Brown ◽  
Debbie Sherratt ◽  
Samantha Hinsley ◽  
Louise Flanagan ◽  
Sadie Roberts ◽  
...  

IntroductionMultiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell tumour with over 5800 new cases each year in the UK. The introduction of biological therapies has improved outcomes for the majority of patients with MM, but in approximately 20% of patients the tumour is characterised by genetic changes which confer a significantly poorer prognosis, generally termed high-risk (HR) MM. It is important to diagnose these genetic changes early and identify more effective first-line treatment options for these patients.Methods and analysisThe Myeloma UK nine OPTIMUM trial (MUKnine) evaluates novel treatment strategies for patients with HRMM. Patients with suspected or newly diagnosed MM, fit for intensive therapy, are offered participation in a tumour genetic screening protocol (MUKnine a), with primary endpoint proportion of patients with molecular screening performed within 8 weeks. Patients identified as molecularly HR are invited into the phase II, single-arm, multicentre trial (MUKnine b) investigating an intensive treatment schedule comprising bortezomib, lenalidomide, daratumumab, low-dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, with single high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by combination consolidation and maintenance therapy. MUKnine b primary endpoints are minimal residual disease (MRD) at day 100 post-ASCT and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include response, safety and quality of life. The trial uses a Bayesian decision rule to determine if this treatment strategy is sufficiently active for further study. Patients identified as not having HR disease receive standard treatment and are followed up in a cohort study. Exploratory studies include longitudinal whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for imaging MRD testing.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval London South East Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 17/LO/0022, 17/LO/0023). Results of studies will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberISRCTN16847817, May 2017; Pre-results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 421
Author(s):  
Niccolo’ Bolli ◽  
Nicola Sgherza ◽  
Paola Curci ◽  
Rita Rizzi ◽  
Vanda Strafella ◽  
...  

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), an asymptomatic plasma cell neoplasm, is currently diagnosed according to the updated IMWG criteria, which reflect an intermediate tumor mass between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and active MM. However, SMM is a heterogeneous entity and individual case may go from an “MGUS-like” behavior to “early MM” with rapid transformation into symptomatic disease. This wide range of clinical outcomes poses challenges for prognostication and management of individual patients. However, initial studies showed a benefit in terms of progression or even survival for early treatment of high-risk SMM patients. While outside of clinical trials the conventional approach to SMM generally remains that of close observation, these studies raised the question of whether early treatment should be offered in high-risk patients, prompting evaluation of several different therapeutic approaches with different goals. While delay of progression to MM with a non-toxic treatment is clearly achievable by early treatment, a convincing survival benefit still needs to be proven by independent studies. Furthermore, if SMM is to be considered less biologically complex than MM, early treatment may offer the chance of cure that is currently not within reach of any active MM treatment. In this paper, we present updated results of completed or ongoing clinical trials in SMM treatment, highlighting areas of uncertainty and critical issues that will need to be addressed in the near future before the “watch and wait” paradigm in SMM is abandoned in favor of early treatment.


Author(s):  
Noa Biran ◽  
Elli Gourna Paleoudis ◽  
Rena Feinman ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Joshua Zenreich ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A150-A150
Author(s):  
Christina Yu ◽  
Brian Walker ◽  
G David Roodman ◽  
Kun Huang ◽  
Michel Sadelain ◽  
...  

BackgroundMultiple Myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease, with a particularly poor prognosis for patients with refractory/relapsed MM or high-risk cytogenetics. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting BCMA can induce deep responses in highly pretreated RRMM; however, remissions are not sustained, and the majority of patients eventually relapse. We hypothesized that genomic determinants of MM play a role in dictating the expression of surface targets that can be of use for immune targeting.MethodsWe analyzed the gene expression of 24 immunotherapeutic targets in a combined dataset of 1900 MM patients from three independent expression datasets obtained from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation CoMMpass study and Gene Expression Omnibus. Given that CAR T-cell therapy may be especially important for patients with high-risk myeloma, we defined the expression of each target in high-risk MM patients by stratifying patients based on several genomic features impacting prognosis. Additionally, we conducted a gene co-expression network analysis and identified 30 gene modules highly correlated with 16 cell surface targets from our panel, further suggesting that genetic determinants of MM may shape a targetable cell surfaceome. In order to determine whether targeting any of these candidate antigens might cause major toxicity to normal cells, we utilized several repositories providing protein data1 to annotate their expression in several normal cell types.ResultsWe determined that a number of genomic factors could stratify the 24 targets into three general groups: 1) targets that show consistent overexpression in high-risk patients: IGF1R, ITGB7, GPRC5D and CD70, and are thus suitable for most high-risk patients; 2) targets that are down-regulated in patients with high-risk genomic features: CD200, CD19, CD40, CD1D and IGKC, perhaps playing a role in cancer immune escape; and 3) targets associated with one specific genetic abnormality, i.e. t(4;14): FUT3, SLAMF7, CD56, CD138 and BCMA, thus of use for precision CAR therapy in this high-risk patient subset.ConclusionsOur work provides a means of target selection for precision CAR therapy, by considering both patient genomic backgrounds and cancer cell surface profiles. Furthermore, our results provide a roadmap for immunotherapy of MM by unbiasedly comparing the expression of top MM cell surface targets in patient data and normal cells and suggest that the genetic landscape of MM may predict the expression of specific targets for precision immunotherapy. The quest for novel MM targets for immunotherapies remains open, and CAR target discovery driven by specific genetic events remains an active area of investigation.ReferencePerna F, Berman SH, Soni RK, et al. Integrating proteomics and transcriptomics for systematic combinatorial chimeric antigen receptor therapy of AML. Cancer Cell 2017;32(4):506–19.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document