Abstract
To date, there is no consensus on choosing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) or allogenic HSCT (allo-HSCT) for peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs). This study aimed to compare the relative efficacy of auto-HSCT versus allo-HSCT for patients with PTCLs. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study about 128 patients who underwent auto-HSCT (n=72) or allo-HSCT (n=56) at 8 medical centers across China between July, 2007 and June, 2017. With a median follow-up of 30 (2-143) months, outcomes of patients receiving auto-HSCT were better than those in allo-HSCT (3-year OS: 70% versus 46%, P = 0.003; 3-year PFS: 59% versus 44%, P = 0.002). Three-year non relapse rate (NRM) in auto-HSCT recipients was 6%, compared with 27% for allo-HSCT recipients ( P =0.004). There was no difference in relapse rate between these two groups (34% in auto-HSCT versus 29% in allo-HSCT, P =0.84). Specifically, patients with low PIT score who received auto-HSCT group in upfront setting had better outcome than patients with high PIT score (3-year OS: 85% versus 40%, P = 0.003). Regarding remission status before transplantation, patients with CR undergoing auto-HSCT had the best outcome (3-year OS: 88% versus 48% in allo-HSCT; P =0.008). For patients less than CR, the outcome of patients undergoing auto-HSCT was similar to that in allo-HSCT (3-year OS:51% versus 46%; P =0.30). When further checking patients in PD or SD, the survival curve of patients in the allo-HSCT group was better than that in the auto-HSCT group. It is plausible to choose auto-HSCT versus allo-HSCT according PIT score and remission status before transplantation.
Clinical and pathological characteristics of peripheral T‐cell lymphomas in a Spanish population: a retrospective study