scholarly journals Primary prevention of venous thromboembolism with apixaban for multiple myeloma patients receiving immunomodulatory agents

2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Cornell ◽  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber ◽  
Brian G. Engelhardt ◽  
Javid Moslehi ◽  
Madan Jagasia ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1233-1233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Frank Cornell ◽  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber ◽  
Brian G Engelhardt ◽  
Javid Moslehi ◽  
Madan Jagasia ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Immunomodulatory/cereblon-binding drugs (IMiDs), including lenalidomide and pomalidomide, have improved survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and comprise the therapeutic foundation at all phases of therapy. While these agents are generally well-tolerated, their increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), in particular deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, presents a major clinical challenge for the treatment of MM. Apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant which directly blocks Factor Xa, has been approved for treatment in patients with VTE. Apixaban has not been prospectively evaluated for thromboprophylaxis in MM in the US. In this phase IV single-arm study (NCT02958969), we prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban for primary prevention of VTE in patients with MM receiving IMiD therapy. Methods Fifty patients with MM on IMiD therapy received apixaban 2.5 mg orally twice daily for primary prevention of VTE and were prospectively monitored for 6 months. Patients requiring therapeutic anticoagulation or with history of prior VTE were excluded. Patients stopped aspirin while on apixaban. Primary safety outcomes were rates of major hemorrhage and clinically relevant non-major hemorrhage over 6 months. Major bleeding was defined as overt bleeding associated with a decrease in hemoglobin of ≥ 2 g/dL, requiring transfusion of ≥ 2 units of blood, occurring in a critical site, or contributing to death. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding was defined as overt bleeding not meeting the criteria for major bleeding but associated with medical intervention, surgical intervention, or interruption of the study drug. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of symptomatic VTE over 6 months. Results Baseline characteristics are listed (Table). Median age was 63 years (range 51-74) with 50% of patients being male. Patients had received a median of 2 lines of therapy (range 0-8), and the majority (82%) had received prior autologous stem cell transplantation (AutoSCT). Patients received apixaban thromboprophylaxis in combination with lenalidomide (58%) or pomalidomide (42%). The majority (66%) received IMiDs for post-autoSCT consolidation or maintenance therapy. Most (80%) had traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors prior to initiation of apixaban, including hypertension (50%), obesity (46%), history of smoking (34%) and hyperlipidemia (32%). At planned interim analysis at 3 months (range 23-149 days) with data still being collected for planned 6 month study duration, no patients had experienced major hemorrhage or VTE. Two patients experienced clinically relevant, non-major hemorrhage, including one patient with unprovoked epistaxis lasting more than 5 minutes and another patient with mechanical trauma. These events were medically managed, and both patients were able to resume apixaban. One patient stopped therapy shortly after initiation due to allergic reaction to apixaban manifesting as generalized edema. No patients experienced stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or death. Conclusions In this pilot study of 50 patients, low-dose apixaban was safe and well tolerated as thromboprophylaxis for patients with MM receiving IMiDs. No patients experienced VTE, major hemorrhage, stroke, or MI. Further randomized studies are needed to validate apixaban as a standard primary prevention anti-thrombotic strategy for patients with MM receiving IMiDs. Disclosures Moslehi: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jagasia:Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Frank Cornell ◽  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber ◽  
Brian G. Engelhardt ◽  
Javid Moslehi ◽  
Madan Jagasia ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2624-2624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Kimpton ◽  
Ryan Buyting ◽  
Daniel J Corsi ◽  
Natasha Rupani ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
...  

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell disorder representing 10% of all hematologic malignancies. Cancer is a known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Patients with MM are at a particularly high risk of developing VTE owing to patient characteristics (e.g. previous history of VTE), disease characteristics, and treatment characteristics including use of the immunomodulatory agents (IMIDs). Unfortunately, standard criteria to identify the patients most at risk for developing VTE in MM while receiving IMIDs are unknown. We sought to assess the incidence of VTE and its associated risk factors in MM patients receiving IMID therapy. A retrospective cohort study including 1680 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma treated at our centre between January 01, 1995 and January 26, 2016 was conducted. The annual incidence of VTE on immunomodulatory agents including thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide was derived. Univariate incidence ratio analyses of VTE for different risk factors was performed including: previous history of VTE, concomitant use of dexamethasone, and ≥/< 6 months after IMID initiation. A total of 309 MM patients treated with an immunomodulatory agent were identified. Nineteen patients were excluded (incomplete data, lost to follow). Of the remaining 290 patients, the mean age was 67.9 and 42.4% were female. Twenty-seven VTE events were recorded. The overall risk ratio was 6.1 for the development of VTE. Patients with a personal history of VTE had an increased risk of suffering a VTE while on IMID therapy (IRR 5.4; CI, 1.9-13.6). The time from the initiation of the IMID therapy (less than 6 months) also increased the risk of developing a VTE (IRR 51.7; CI,19.4-160.1). The concomitant use of dexamethasone was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk (IRR 1.7; CI, 0.3-69.5). Incidence risk ratios for these risk factors are depicted in Table 1. Our results suggest that a personal history of VTE and the time from the initiation of the IMID (less than 6 months) are associated with an increased risk of VTE in MM patients receiving IMID therapy. This may be helpful in determining which multiple myeloma patients treated with an IMID agent warrant more aggressive thromboprophylaxis. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal agent, intensity, and duration of thromboprophylaxis in patients with MM on IMID therapy. Disclosures McCurdy: Celgene: Honoraria.


2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (S1) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Reske ◽  
Mariateresa Fulciniti ◽  
Nikhil C. Munshi

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (03) ◽  
pp. 209-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Annamaria Brioli ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
Beatrice Zannetti ◽  
Lucia Pantani ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1835-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina M Piedra ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Larry W. Buie ◽  
Sean M. Devlin ◽  
Jessica Flynn ◽  
...  

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4964-4964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Crowther ◽  
Jamie Doyle ◽  
Stanford Taylor ◽  
Nadia Ali

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in multiple myeloma (MM) patients for several reasons; hematologic malignancy itself is a VTE risk factor and standard of care immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in combination with dexamethasone (Dex) increase the risk further. This combination therapy has a mean VTE incidence of 21.5% in studies that did not use thromboprophylaxis and is recommended for all patients on IMiDs, although the optimal thromboprophylactic regimen remains uncertain. In clinical practice, aspirin (ASA) is commonly prescribed for VTE prophylaxis due to the ease of use. Despite this, the incidence of VTE remains between 7-14%. There is a growing body of literature supporting the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of VTE in cancer populations. We wanted to assess the incidence of VTE despite ASA prophylaxis at our institution and to further characterize the role of DOACs in the MM population. To do this, we performed a chart review of all MM patients who had been treated with lenalidomide and a DOAC, assessing for VTE development and patient outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with the diagnosis of MM treated with lenalidomide therapy at Fox Chase Cancer Center at Temple University Hospital or Cottman Avenue after Jan 1st, 2015 to July 2019. Eligible patients were identified through electronic medical record data mining for patients that had been diagnosed with MM, had been prescribed lenalidomide, had been taking ASA while on lenalidomide, and switched to rivaroxaban, edoxaban or apixaban. For comparison, the number of patients treated with lenalidomide and ASA who did not switch to a DOAC were also identified. Patient charts were reviewed for VTE development and bleeding complications after DOAC administration. Results: 132 patients were identified who had a diagnosis of MM and had been prescribed lenalidomide between Jan 1, 2015 and July 31, 2019. These patients were also prescribed aspirin except for three who were already on a DOAC prior to starting lenalidomide. Of the total 132 patients, only 17 were prescribed a DOAC. Six of the patients were on DOACs for reasons other than VTE (atrial fibrillation N=4, atrial flutter N=1, marantic endocarditis N=1). Eleven patients were started on DOACs for VTE; incidence of 8.3% in our myeloma population. However three of these VTEs occurred within one month of high dose melphalan chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue. These three patients had been off lenalidomide for over one month prior to VTE. Eight of the 17 patients with VTE developed clots in the setting of active MM and concurrent therapy with IMiD/Dex, independent of hospitalizations or other provoking factors. This is an incidence of 6.0% for VTE directly attributed to therapy. Six patients were on lenalidomide and Dex, while two patients developed VTE while on pomalidomide and Dex. No patients on lenalidomide experienced recurrent VTEs after being switched to therapeutic dose DOAC. One patient on pomalidomide/Dex did experience recurrent VTE. We examined all 17 patients who were on DOACs, 16 of which had been on IMiD and DOACs concurrently. Three had minor bleeding events which all resolved spontaneously. One patient had a major bleeding event, which was a fatal ruptured cerebral aneurysm while on a DOAC and ASA concurrently. Conclusion: The incidence of VTE in our patient population receiving IMiD/Dex while on ASA prophylaxis therapy was similar to what has been previously reported in the literature. We examined the clinical outcomes of 16 patients treated with IMiDs and DOACs concurrently and found few bleeding events. The one major bleed was likely precipitated by malignant hypertension and not a direct result of being on a DOAC. Taken together these results further support the growing body of evidence that DOACs are effective and safe treatments for VTE in cancer patients, including MM. Moving forward, our clinical experience with treatment dose DOACs supports the use of prophylactic dose DOACs to potentially further reduce the incidence of VTE in this high-risk population. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Anna L. Parks ◽  
Swetha Kambhampati ◽  
Bita Fakhri ◽  
Charalambos Andreadis ◽  
Lissa Gray ◽  
...  

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor modified T Cell (CAR-T) therapy is a rapidly developing treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM). Although this population is at high risk for thrombosis, there are few data about rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) with CAR-T. Additionally, treatment with anticoagulation is complicated because of the prevalence of thrombocytopenia following CAR-T. Our goal was to determine the incidence, associated risk factors, management and outcomes of VTE and ATE in the 60 days following CAR-T therapy. Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all patients who received inpatient CAR-T cells at UCSF Medical Center between January 2018 and May 2020 for R/R NHL or MM as standard-of-care or on a clinical trial. The outcomes of incident VTE and ATE were identified by ICD-10 codes and medical record review. Patient characteristics, pre-existing thrombosis risk factors, laboratory results, medications, and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding or recurrent thrombotic complications were obtained through chart review. We used descriptive statistics to delineate risk factors, incidence, management and outcomes of thrombotic events. Results: Ninety-one patients who underwent CAR-T therapy were included in the analysis, 37 with NHL and 54 with MM. For NHL, mean age was 63 (range 38-82), and 41% were women. For MM, mean age was 62 (range 33-77), and 50% were women. Patients with NHL were treated with either investigational or Federal Drug Administration-approved CD19-directed therapies, and patients with MM were treated with a variety of investigational B-cell maturation antigen-directed (BCMA) therapies. For thrombotic risk factors, 13% of patients with NHL had a history of VTE, 3% had a history of ATE, 27% had a BMI ≥30, 59% had a recent procedure including central venous catheter (CVC) placement, 14% had an intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and 22% had an infectious complication in the 30 days pre- or post-CAR-T. Forty-one percent of patients with NHL had neurotoxicity of any grade, and 59% had CRS of any grade. At 30 days, 57% had a complete response, 41% had a partial response, 3% had stable disease. For MM, 6% of patients had a pre-existing history of VTE, 2% had a history of ATE, 19% had a BMI ≥30, 96% had a recent procedure, 11% had an ICU stay and 19% had an infection. Seventeen percent had neurotoxicity, and 85% had CRS. Thirty-two percent of patients with NHL and 48% with MM received pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis while undergoing CAR-T. For those who did not receive VTE prophylaxis, thrombocytopenia was the reason for holding prophylaxis, which occurred in 51% and 50% of NHL and MM patients, respectively. In the 60 days post-CAR-T, 4 (11%) patients with NHL were diagnosed with VTE-3 pulmonary embolism (PE) and 1 lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with a previously placed inferior vena cava filter. Four (7%) patients with MM were diagnosed with VTE-1 PE and 3 upper extremity DVTs associated with CVCs. Five out of these 8 (63%) patients had symptomatic VTE, while the remainder were incidental on PETCT. Mean time from CAR-T infusion to VTE diagnosis was 20 days (range 6-39 days). There were no documented ATEs. Six out of 8 (75%) were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation. Of those who were anticoagulated, 4 patients received direct oral anticoagulants and 2 received low-molecular-weight-heparin. Duration was 3 months in 3 patients, 11 days in 1, 150 days in 1, and indefinitely in 1 with atrial fibrillation. Among all 8 patients with VTE, there were no bleeding events or recurrent thromboses regardless of whether or not they received anticoagulation. Discussion: In this cohort of patients with R/R NHL or MM who received either CD19- or BCMA-directed therapies, almost 1 in 10 developed VTE in the 60 days post-CAR-T. This occurred in the context of a high prevalence of risk factors for thrombosis and low rates of pharmacologic prophylaxis. Among those who developed VTE, the majority were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation for at least 3 months, without documented bleeding or recurrent VTE. Our findings provide crucial information on a common complication that can inform patients, clinicians and researchers and should be expanded upon in larger, prospective studies to identify optimal preventive and therapeutic strategies. Disclosures Fakhri: University of California San Francisco: Current Employment. Andreadis:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene/Juno: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wong:Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Fortis: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding. Shah:BMS, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma, Teneobio, Poseida, Nektar: Research Funding; GSK, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi, BMS, CareDx, Kite, Karyopharm: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document