scholarly journals Detection of a deletion at 22q11 locus involvingZNF280A/ZNF280B/PRAME/GGTLC2in B‐cell malignancies: simply a consequence of an immunoglobulin lambda light chain rearrangement

2019 ◽  
Vol 186 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Mraz ◽  
Sarka Pospisilova
2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-265
Author(s):  
Anna L. Paterson ◽  
Hesham El‐Daly ◽  
Livia Raso‐Barnett ◽  
Ming‐Qing Du ◽  
Olivier Giger ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena V Zakharova ◽  
Tatyana A Makarova ◽  
Ekaterina S Stolyarevich ◽  
Olga A Vorobyeva

Background:Monoclonal immunoglobulin–mediated kidney disease with various patterns of damage may occur in patients with B-cell malignancies and non-malignant monoclonal gammopathies, and the latter are actually merged under the umbrella of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Amyloidosis is the most well-known monoclonal immunoglobulin–related kidney damage. We focused on the rarer conditions and aimed to evaluate the non-amyloid spectrum of monoclonal immunoglobulin–mediated patterns of renal damage in real clinical practice.Methods:A single-center non-interventional retrospective study included 45 patients with pathology-proven non-amyloid monoclonal immunoglobulin–mediated kidney disease, followed during 2002–2018. Disease duration, proteinuria, serum creatinine, need for dialysis at the time of kidney biopsy, clinical diagnosis, and kidney pathology findings were analyzed.Results:No significant differences in the median age, disease duration at the time of biopsy, or main clinical presentation of kidney disease were found between patients with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance and patients with B-cell malignancies. Pathology patterns like proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits, membranous nephropathy, C3 glomerulopathy, cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis, and combinations of light chain proximal tubulopathy with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease, and of C3 glomerulopathy with light chain proximal tubulopathy were found in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance setting only. In contrast, light chain proximal tubulopathy alone, anti-glomerular basement glomerulonephritis, and combinations of cast nephropathy with light chain proximal tubulopathy, and cast nephropathy with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease were associated with multiple myeloma only. Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease, intracapillary monoclonal immunoglobulin M deposits, and cast nephropathy alone were seen in both settings.Conclusion:The presence of monoclonal gammopathy in patients with proteinuria and/or impaired kidney function demands kidney biopsy. Neither duration of kidney disease nor its clinical presentation allows differentiating malignant and non-malignant causes of monoclonal immunoglobulin–mediated renal damage. Several pathology patterns, even cast nephropathy, can be found both in cases of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance and in cases of B-cell malignancies. Dual patterns of damage, including combinations of organized and non-organized deposits, or organized deposits with monoclonal immunoglobulin–induced damage without monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition, constitute up to 9%, mostly in multiple myeloma cases.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1376-1376
Author(s):  
Christopher S Carlson ◽  
Bryan Howie ◽  
Alfred L. Garfall ◽  
Eline Luning Prak

Abstract Select tumor tag sequences, informed by the probability of generating the same sequence in an independent recombination event, are likely to be useful in tracking mature B cell malignancies where the IGH locus has been deleted. We considered the use of IGK and IGL for this purpose, but found that 2-4% of these rearrangements were shared between different individuals. The relatively high frequencies of such public rearrangements at IGK and IGL prompted us to search for other forms of sequence diversity that could be used as private clonotypic tags. Somatic hypermutations (SHM) may serve such a function. Our analysis of IGK and IGL suggests that tumor tracking sequences for detecting minimal residual disease should be selected with care, and these loci may be best suited for lymphoid malignancies that are characterized by high levels of SHM. Tracking minimal residual disease for B cell malignancies is an established technology, traditionally using either flow cytometry or a custom quantitative PCR assay for each patient. Recent technical developments in the massively parallel sequencing of somatically rearranged IG loci allow for a standard assay to be applied to screen for residual tumor burden in all patients, by first identifying the clonal IG rearrangements tagging the tumor in an index sample taken from the patient during active disease, and then screening for these tumor tagging sequences in follow up samples. A crucial assumption in these tagging strategies is that the tumor tagging sequences are idiosyncratic to the tumor, and unlikely to be generated independently in a recurrent rearrangement. In order to screen for recurrent sequences between two healthy individuals, we generated IG heavy and light chain libraries from 100,000 antigen experienced B cells (CD19+CD27+) isolated from whole blood by FACS. 130 bp reads were collected, starting within the J segment and extending across the CDR3 into the V segment. Unique sequences were compared between individuals to assess the frequency of nucleotide identical, “public” rearrangements shared between individuals. Less than 0.01% of unique IGH sequences overlapped between individuals, so the risk of a false positive MRD result from recurrent recombination at IGH is minimal. However, 4.3% and 1.9% of unique sequences at IGK and IGL, respectively, were shared between individuals. The shared sequences had significantly higher average copy numbers than unshared sequences, accounting for 20% of total sequences at IGK and 12% of total sequences at IGL. These data suggest that B cells carrying public sequences undergo higher levels of clonal expansion, and/or they are recurrently produced. Public sequences carried by B cell malignancies are likely to be of limited utility as tumor-tagging sequences, as it may be impossible to distinguish between low-level residual disease and benign, recurrent rearrangements in the patient. Therefore we assessed if we could predict whether a given sequence in the memory repertoire would be public using solely information derived from that sequence. We used logistic regression to screen for variables to predict the likelihood of a given sequence to be public, and identified a number of expected variables as significant predictors, including the identity of the V and J segments, the length of the non-templated insertion at the junction, and the number of somatic hypermutations within the V or J segment. By far the most important of these factors was the number of SHM events in the clone; consequently, the most useful light chains for tumor tracking will be those with significant SHM. We continue to explore factors contributing to the public IG repertoire. Particularly at IGK, there is an unexpectedly narrow range of CDR3 lengths, and we are determining if this might be attributable to low diversity in the primary repertoire, or due to positive selection in favor of this length in the mature naïve or mature repertoires. In conclusion, a high frequency of public IG light chain sequences in the antigen- experienced peripheral B cell repertoire suggests that naïve application of light chain clones for tracking MRD can generate false positive results, but that careful selection of tumor tracking sequences with SHMs can minimize this risk. Disclosures: Carlson: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Howie:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Equity Ownership.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 506-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Ramos ◽  
Barbara Savoldo ◽  
Enli Liu ◽  
Adrian P. Gee ◽  
Zhuyong Mei ◽  
...  

Abstract Adoptive transfer of T cells with a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) to treat B-cell malignancies shows remarkable clinical efficacy. However, long-term persistence of T cells targeting CD19, a pan-B cell marker, causes sustained depletion of normal B cells and consequent severe hypogammaglobulinemia. In order to target B-cell malignancies more selectively, we exploited the clonal restriction of mature B-cell malignancies, which express either a κ or a λ-light immunoglobulin (Ig) chain. We generated a CAR specific for κ-light chain (CAR.κ) to selectively target κ+ lymphoma/leukemia cells, while sparing the normal B cells expressing the reciprocal λ-light chain, thus minimizing the impairment of humoral immunity. After preclinical validation, we designed a phase I clinical trial in which patients with refractory/relapsed κ+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are infused with autologous T cells expressing a CAR.κ that includes a CD28 costimulatory domain. The protocol also included patients with multiple myeloma with the aim of targeting putative myeloma initiating cells. Three dose levels (DL) are being assessed, with escalation determined by a continual reassessment method: 0.2 (DL1), 1 (DL2) and 2 (DL3) ×108 T cells/m2. Repeat infusions are allowed if there is at least stable disease after treatment. End points being evaluated include safety, persistence of CAR+T cells and antitumor activity. T cells were generated for 13 patients by activating autologous PBMC with immobilized OKT3 (n=5) or CD3/CD28 monoclonal antibodies (n=8). In 2 patients with >95% circulating leukemic cells, CD3 positive selection was performed using CliniMACS. After transduction, T cells (1.2×107±0.5×107) were expanded ex vivo for 18±4 days in the presence of interleukin (IL)-2 to reach sufficient numbers for dose escalation. CAR expression was 81%±13% by flow cytometry (74,112±23,000 transgene copy numbers/mg DNA). Products were composed predominantly of CD8+ cells (78%±10%), with a small proportion of naïve (5±4%) and memory T cells (17%±12%). CAR+ T cells specifically targeted κ+ tumors as assessed by 51Cr release assays (specific lysis 79%±10%, 20:1 E:T ratio) but not κ–tumors (11%±7%) or the NK-sensitive cell line K562 (26%±13%). Ten patients have been treated: 2 on DL1, 3 on DL2 and 5 on DL3. Any other treatments were discontinued at least 4 weeks prior to T-cell infusion. Patients with an absolute leukocyte count >500/µL received 12.5 mg/kg cyclophosphamide 4 days before T-cell infusion to induce mild lymphopenia. Infusions were well tolerated, without side effects. Persistence of infused T cells was assessed in blood by CAR.κ-specific Q-PCR assay and peaked 1 to 2 weeks post infusion, remaining detectable for 6 weeks to 9 months. Although the CAR contained a murine single-chain variable fragment (scFv), we did not detect human anti-mouse antibodies following treatment and CAR.κ+T cell expansion continued to be observed even after repeated infusions. We detected modest (<20 fold) elevation of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, at the time of peak expansion of T cells, but systemic inflammatory response syndrome (cytokine storm) was absent. No new-onset hypogammaglobulinemia was observed. All 10 patients are currently evaluable for clinical response. Of the patients with relapsed NHL, 2/5 entered complete remission (after 2 and 3 infusions at dose level 1 and 3, respectively), 1/5 had a partial response and 2 progressed; 3/3 patients with multiple myeloma have had stable disease for 2, 8 and 11 months, associated with up to 38% reduction in their paraprotein; and 2/2 patients with CLL progressed before or shortly after the 6-week evaluation. In conclusion, our data indicate that infusion of CAR.κ+ T cells is safe at every DL and can be effective in patients with κ+ lymphoproliferative disorders. Disclosures: Savoldo: Celgene: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Rooney:Celgene: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Heslop:Celgene: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Brenner:Celgene: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Dotti:Celgene: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.


1999 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Paule Lefranc ◽  
Nathalie Pallarès ◽  
Jean-Pol Frippiat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document