scholarly journals Outcomes of patients with simultaneous diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma and multiple myeloma

2018 ◽  
Vol 185 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sikander Ailawadhi ◽  
Bhagirathbhai R. Dholaria ◽  
Sharad Khurana ◽  
Taimur Sher ◽  
Victoria Alegria ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 899-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa Sena Teixeira Mendes ◽  
Natalie Peters ◽  
Ayoma D Attygalle ◽  
Andrew Wotherspoon

Author(s):  
Clive S. Zent ◽  
Aaron Polliack

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) is the most prevalent lymphoid neoplasm in Europe and North America. The ‘cell of origin’ is a mature B lymphocyte that has a rearranged immunoglobulin gene. CLL cells express modest amounts of surface immunoglobulin, and are characterized by defective apoptosis. The cause of CLL is unknown....


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Rodrigues ◽  
Fernanda S. Sagrillo ◽  
Carlos A. M. Fraga

Duvelisib (Copiktra®) is a dual inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Kδ and PI3Kγ). In 2018, duvelisib was first approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL)/ small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) after at least two prior therapies. Duvelisib has also been approved under accelerated track for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) after at least two prior systemic therapies. In this review, we provide a series of information about duvelisib, such as the development of clinical trials for LLC/SLL and FL and the steps used for its synthesis.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3546-3546
Author(s):  
Alexandra G Smith ◽  
Timothy Bagguley ◽  
Eve Roman ◽  
Andy C Rawstron ◽  
James R Bailey ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The treatment landscape for many mature B-cell malignancies is evolving rapidly, with patients and clinicians facing increasingly complex choices about therapeutic options that differ in efficacy, toxicity and cost. Accounting for around a quarter of all haematological cancer diagnoses, multiple myeloma (MM) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) are two conditions where increases in the number and combinations of potentially life-prolonging therapies has been particularly marked; ranging from the use of single alkylating agents to immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors for MM, and combination chemotherapy, immuno-chemotherapy, novel monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for CLL. Contemporary data enabling the success of such therapeutic changes to be evaluated in the general patient population is, however, lacking. With centralized diagnostics and a unified clinical network covering a catchment population of 4 million, the UK's Haematological Malignancy Research Network (www.hmrn.org) was specifically established to provide timely real-world data to answer such questions; and findings from this unique population-based cohort are reported here. Methods Patients newly diagnosed 2004-13 with MM (n=2084) or CLL (n=1866) were followed-up until January 2016. Demographic, prognostic, first-line treatment and outcome data for the time-periods 2004-07, 2008-10 and 2011-15 were examined using standard statistical methods; relative survival (RS) was estimated using national life tables. Results The median age at diagnosis of MM was 73 years (17% <60 years); 39% of patients presented with an ISS score of III and 25% were asymptomatic (CRAB score 0). In total, 1514 (73%) patients received first-line chemotherapy either at diagnosis or as a consequence of disease progression. Regimens were classified by their main agent, and the therapy changes over the 11-year period are shown in Figure 1a; in 2004-07, 44% of treated patients received single-agent alkylating therapy, in 2008-10 76% were treated with combination immunomodulatory therapy and by 2011-15 this had increased to 92%. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and RS estimates for all patients combined were 45.9% (95% Confidence Interval 43.4-48.4) and 52.0% (49.1-54.8) respectively. Differences in outcome by treatment year are clearly evident (Figure 1b): 3-year RS 2004-07, 46.5% (41.8-51.2); 2008-10, 48.4% (43.5-53.2); and 2011-15, 62.1% (56.8-66.9). The improvement in survival for patients treated in 2011-15 compared to 2004-07 was confirmed by multivariate Cox regression (Hazard Ratio 0.65, 0.56-0.76). With a median diagnostic age of 71 years (18% <60 years); the majority of CLL patients had early-stage disease (BinetStage A, 78%). In total 547 patients were treated with first-line chemotherapy, with the regimen again changing over time (Figure 1c). Patients treated 2004-07 generally received single alkylating agents (56%) or combination chemotherapy (42%), by 2008-10 32% of patients had a monoclonal antibody added to chemotherapy (chemo-immunotherapy), increasing to 72% among those treated 2011-15. The 3-year OS and RS for all treated patients combined were 69.5% (65.3-73.3) and 80.3% (75.5-84.3) respectively. However, there was no incremental statistically significant change in 3-year RS (Figure 1d); 2004-07, 76.4% (65.2-84.4); 2008-10, 78.3% (69.8-84.6); and 2011-15 84% (76.3-89.4); and taking 2004-07 as the reference, the corresponding hazard ratios for the 3 time-periods were 1 (reference), 1.00 (0.78-1.37) and 0.79 (0.58-1.09). The cost implications of the changing treatment landscape are currently being examined, and by December 2016 the findings presented above will include more recently diagnosed patients (2014-15), which is particularly pertinent for CLL, where a step-change may have occurred due to the introduction of TKIs. Conclusions Our analyses confirm that first-line chemotherapy for MM and CLL is changing markedly; highlighting the importance of monitoring the impact of therapeutic change in a real-world setting. The improvement in MM survival currently contrasts with CLL, suggesting that encouraging results from clinical trials may not always translate directly into similar improvements at a population level. Clearly, additional analysis of data from patients diagnosed >2014 are required. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Smith: Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Cook:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Glycomimetics: Consultancy. Patmore:Roche: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Pulenzas ◽  
◽  
A Porwit ◽  
KJ Craddock ◽  
N Thavarajah ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document