TEWL reference values in healthy adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 179 (5) ◽  
pp. e204-e204 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Akdeniz ◽  
S. Gabriel ◽  
A. Lichterfeld-Kottner ◽  
U. Blume-Peytavi ◽  
J. Kottner
2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ohlendorf ◽  
K. Kerth ◽  
W. Osiander ◽  
F. Holzgreve ◽  
L. Fraeulin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to collect standard reference values of the weight and the maximum pressure distribution in healthy adults aged 18–65 years and to investigate the influence of constitutional parameters on it. Methods A total of 416 healthy subjects (208 male / 208 female) aged between 18 and 65 years (Ø 38.3 ± 14.1 years) participated in this study, conducted 2015–2019 in Heidelberg. The age-specific evaluation is based on 4 age groups (G1, 18–30 years; G2, 31–40 years; G3, 41–50 years; G4, 51–65 years). A pressure measuring plate FDM-S (Zebris/Isny/Germany) was used to collect body weight distribution and maximum pressure distribution of the right and left foot and left and right forefoot/rearfoot, respectively. Results Body weight distribution of the left (50.07%) and right (50.12%) foot was balanced. There was higher load on the rearfoot (left 54.14%; right 55.09%) than on the forefoot (left 45.49%; right 44.26%). The pressure in the rearfoot was higher than in the forefoot (rearfoot left 9.60 N/cm2, rearfoot right 9.51 N/cm2/forefoot left 8.23 N/cm2, forefoot right 8.59 N/cm2). With increasing age, the load in the left foot shifted from the rearfoot to the forefoot as well as the maximum pressure (p ≤ 0.02 and 0.03; poor effect size). With increasing BMI, the body weight shifted to the left and right rearfoot (p ≤ 0.001, poor effect size). As BMI increased, so did the maximum pressure in all areas (p ≤ 0.001 and 0.03, weak to moderate effect size). There were significant differences in weight and maximum pressure distribution in the forefoot and rearfoot in the different age groups, especially between younger (18–40 years) and older (41–65 years) subjects. Discussion Healthy individuals aged from 18 to 65 years were found to have a balanced weight distribution in an aspect ratio, with a 20% greater load of the rearfoot. Age and BMI were found to be influencing factors of the weight and maximum pressure distribution, especially between younger and elder subjects. The collected standard reference values allow comparisons with other studies and can serve as a guideline in clinical practice and scientific studies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Pereira Lima ◽  
Fabiana Damasceno Almeida ◽  
Tania Janaudis-Ferreira ◽  
Bianca Carmona ◽  
Giane Amorim Ribeiro-Samora ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine reference values for the six-minute pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) in healthy adults in Brazil, correlating the results with arm length, circumference of the upper arm/forearm of the dominant arm, and the level of physical activity. Methods: The participants (all volunteers) performed two 6PBRTs, 30 min apart. They were instructed to move as many rings as possible in six minutes. The best test result was selected for data analysis. Results: The sample comprised 104 individuals, all over 30 years of age. Reference values were reported by age bracket. We found that age correlated with 6PBRT results. The number of rings moved was higher in the 30- to 39-year age group than in the > 80-year age group (430.25 ± 77.00 vs. 265.00 ± 65.75), and the difference was significant (p < 0.05). The 6PBRT results showed a weak, positive correlation with the level of physical activity (r = 0.358; p < 0.05) but did not correlate significantly with any other variable studied. Conclusions: In this study, we were able to determine reference values for the 6PBRT in healthy adults in Brazil. There was a correlation between 6PBRT results and age.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Capuano ◽  
R Cocchia ◽  
F Ferrara ◽  
S Lanero ◽  
V Russo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Left ventricular hemodynamic forces (LV-HDF) have been recently demonstrated to be promising markers of sub-clinical dysfunction and potential predictors of disease outcome. However, there is a lack of reference values in healthy subjects. Knowledge of physiologic ranges is mandatory towards the use of LV-HDF-based indices for disease assessment in future clinical applications. Purpose Aim of the current study is to define the normal reference values for LV-HDF parameters in a large cohort of healthy adults. Here we present preliminary results for the initial set of enrolled subjects. Methods We enrolled 82 healthy subjects [mean age 44 ± 13.2 years (range 18-88), 41 men]. All participants underwent standard transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examination, as recommended by current guidelines, including apical two-, three- and four-chamber windows, acquired at a frame rate above 40 Hz. These were then analyzed by tri-plane tissue tracking, measuring LV volume and LV ejection fraction (EF) as reference parameters. The same tracking method was used to evaluate the global hemodynamic force by a novel mathematical calculation technique applied to the three-dimensional endocardial contour. Physical-based LV-HDF parameters were then extracted for clinical application; these included the amplitude (root mean square) of the longitudinal and transversal force components (FL and FT) and their alignment angle relative to the LV axis. Parameters were computed as average over the whole cardiac cycle as well as limited to the systolic phase. Forces were normalized with LV volume to reduce variability with LV dimension, and divided by specific weight to yield a dimensionless measure. Results Mean EF was 63 ± 9%. Whole cycle LV-HDF parameters were: FL = 16.0 ± 5.6%, FT = 2.3 ± 0.8%, with significant longitudinal alignment FT/FL = 0.15 ± 0.04, angle = 13.0°±3.1°. Systolic HDF parameters were: FL = 22.7 ± 8.2%, FT = 2.9 ± 1.1%, with longitudinal alignment FT/FL = 0.13 ± 0.04, angle = 11.2°±3.1°. Importantly, dimensionless physical-based LV-HDF parameters showed no significant variation with age, gender or BSA. Conclusions We report the physiologic range of LV-HDF parameters measured by TTE. Knowledge of age- and gender-specific reference values, for a combination of standard, mechanical and hemodynamic indices, can improve the global assessment of the LV function and may help to detect sub-clinical stages of LV dysfunction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis G. Alcala Gonzalez ◽  
Renske A. B. Oude Nijhuis ◽  
Andreas J. P. M. Smout ◽  
Albert J. Bredenoord

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Gibbons ◽  
Nadine Fruchter ◽  
Sherry Sloan ◽  
Robert D. Levy

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Pereira Lima ◽  
Marcelo Velloso ◽  
Bruno Porto Pessoa ◽  
Fabiana Damasceno Almeida ◽  
Giane Amorim Ribeiro-Samora ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To establish reference values for the Unsupported Upper Limb EXercise (UULEX) test, which measures peak arm exercise capacity, in healthy adults in Brazil. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, involving presumably healthy individuals ≥ 30 years of age who completed questionnaires and underwent spirometry. All of the individuals underwent two UULEX tests 30-min apart. The outcome measure was the maximum time (in min) to completion of the test. Results: We included 100 individuals between 30 and 80 years of age. The mean test completion time was 11.99 ± 1.90 min among the women and 12.89 ± 2.15 min among the men (p = 0.03). The test completion time showed statistically significant correlations with age (r = −0.48; p < 0.001), gender (r = 0.28; p = 0.004), body mass index (BMI, r = −0.20; p = 0.05), and height (r = 0.28; p = 0.005). Linear regression analysis showed that the predictors of UULEX completion time were age (p = 0.000), BMI (p = 0.003), and gender (p = 0.019), which collectively explained 30% of the total variability. The mean UULEX completion time was 6% lower for the women than for the men. Conclusions: The present study was able to establish reference values for the UULEX test in healthy adults in Brazil. The values were influenced by age, gender, and BMI.


Author(s):  
Büşra Pirinç ◽  
Zeliha Fazlıoğulları ◽  
Mustafa Koplay ◽  
Ahmet Kağan Karabulut ◽  
Nadire Ünver Doğan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document