scholarly journals A bivariate joint frailty model with mixture framework for survival analysis of recurrent events with dependent censoring and cure fraction

Biometrics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 753-766
Author(s):  
Richard Tawiah ◽  
Geoffrey J. McLachlan ◽  
Shu Kay Ng
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaheh Talebi‐Ghane ◽  
AhmadReza Baghestani ◽  
Farid Zayeri ◽  
Virgine Rondeau ◽  
Ali Akhavan

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 694-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Cook ◽  
Jerald F. Lawless ◽  
Ker-Ai Lee

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 2295-2306 ◽  
Author(s):  
MC Jones ◽  
Angela Noufaily ◽  
Kevin Burke

We are concerned with the flexible parametric analysis of bivariate survival data. Elsewhere, we argued in favour of an adapted form of the ‘power generalized Weibull’ distribution as an attractive vehicle for univariate parametric survival analysis. Here, we additionally observe a frailty relationship between a power generalized Weibull distribution with one value of the parameter which controls distributional choice within the family and a power generalized Weibull distribution with a smaller value of that parameter. We exploit this relationship to propose a bivariate shared frailty model with power generalized Weibull marginal distributions linked by the BB9 or ‘power variance function’ copula, then change it to have adapted power generalized Weibull marginals in the obvious way. The particular choice of copula is, therefore, natural in the current context, and the corresponding bivariate adapted power generalized Weibull model a novel combination of pre-existing components. We provide a number of theoretical properties of the models. We also show the potential of the bivariate adapted power generalized Weibull model for practical work via an illustrative example involving a well-known retinopathy dataset, for which the analysis proves to be straightforward to implement and informative in its outcomes.


Biostatistics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney A Sparapani ◽  
Lisa E Rein ◽  
Sergey S Tarima ◽  
Tourette A Jackson ◽  
John R Meurer

Summary Much of survival analysis is concerned with absorbing events, i.e., subjects can only experience a single event such as mortality. This article is focused on non-absorbing or recurrent events, i.e., subjects are capable of experiencing multiple events. Recurrent events have been studied by many; however, most rely on the restrictive assumptions of linearity and proportionality. We propose a new method for analyzing recurrent events with Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) avoiding such restrictive assumptions. We explore this new method via a motivating example of hospital admissions for diabetes patients and simulated data sets.


2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilma Hernández-Herrera ◽  
David Moriña ◽  
Albert Navarro

Abstract Background When dealing with recurrent events in observational studies it is common to include subjects who became at risk before follow-up. This phenomenon is known as left censoring, and simply ignoring these prior episodes can lead to biased and inefficient estimates. We aimed to propose a statistical method that performs well in this setting. Methods Our proposal was based on the use of models with specific baseline hazards. In this, the number of prior episodes were imputed when unknown and stratified according to whether the subject had been at risk of presenting the event before t = 0. A frailty term was also used. Two formulations were used for this “Specific Hazard Frailty Model Imputed” based on the “counting process” and “gap time.” Performance was then examined in different scenarios through a comprehensive simulation study. Results The proposed method performed well even when the percentage of subjects at risk before follow-up was very high. Biases were often below 10% and coverages were around 95%, being somewhat conservative. The gap time approach performed better with constant baseline hazards, whereas the counting process performed better with non-constant baseline hazards. Conclusions The use of common baseline methods is not advised when knowledge of prior episodes experienced by a participant is lacking. The approach in this study performed acceptably in most scenarios in which it was evaluated and should be considered an alternative in this context. It has been made freely available to interested researchers as R package miRecSurv.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document