Impassable scientific, ethical and legal barriers to body‐to‐head transplantation

Bioethics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-182
Author(s):  
Ruipeng Lei ◽  
Renzong Qiu
Keyword(s):  
Head Transplantation ◽  
Legal Barriers

Access to Justice for Ethno-Racial Psychiatric Consumer/Survivors in Ontario

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby Dhand
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Institutional Racism ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Complex Needs ◽  
Troubles Mentaux ◽  
Inappropriate Care ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Complex Forms ◽  
Face Complex ◽  
Legal Barriers

Ethno-racial psychiatric consumer/survivors face complex forms of discrimination as a result of the culture specific stigmatization of mental health disabilities, institutional racism and culturally inappropriate care. In an effort to achieve better access to justice for ethno-racial communities, we must strive to understand their complex needs, perspectives and conceptions of mental health. Thus, I identify and critique the legal barriers, which are perceived to differentially affect ethno-racial psychiatric consumer/survivors in Ontario, through an analysis of the Consent and Capacity Board [CCB]. I propose the hypothesis that factors such as race, ethnicity, culture, poverty and social exclusion are not fully addressed by the CCB. I use data collected from interviews with stakeholders to reveal the procedural, structural/systemic and discretionary barriers faced by ethno-racial psychiatric consumer/survivors within the CCB’s pre-hearing, hearing and post-hearing processes, along with recommendations to address these barriers.Les consommateurs/survivants de la psychiatrie ethnoraciale doivent surmonter des formes complexes de discrimination en raison de la stigmatisation culturelle des troubles mentaux, du racisme institutionnel et des soins culturellement inappropriés. Pour améliorer l’accès à la justice des collectivités ethnoraciales, nous devons nous efforcer de comprendre leurs besoins complexes, leurs perspectives et leurs conceptions de la santé mentale. Dans le présent travail, je relève et critique les obstacles juridiques, qui sont perçus comme touchant différemment les consommateurs/survivants de la psychiatrie ethnoraciale en Ontario, en effectuant une analyse des travaux de la Commission du consentement et de la capacité (la « CCC »). J’émets l’hypothèse que la CCC ne prend pas pleinement en compte des facteurs comme la race, l’ethnicité, la culture, la pauvreté et l’exclusion sociale. J’utilise des données provenant d’entrevues avec des parties prenantes pour illustrer les obstacles procéduraux, structurels/systémiques et discrétionnaires auxquels font face les consommateurs/survivants de la psychiatrie ethnoraciale lors des audiences préparatoires et des audiences de la CCC et dans le cadre des processus suivis par la CCC après les audiences, et je formule des recommandations visant à surmonter ces obstacles.

A Web without a Center

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Knaack
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Public Governance ◽  
The Public ◽  
Otc Derivatives ◽  
Unilateral Action ◽  
Regulatory Cooperation ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
Legal Barriers ◽  
Global Data

G20 leaders vowed to collect and share OTC derivatives trade data so that regulators can obtain a global picture of market and risk evolution. This chapter employs a network perspective to explain why they have failed to meet this commitment to date. It examines three networks: the OTC derivatives market itself, and those of its private and public governance. The analysis shows that the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the public supervisory entity, struggles to establish itself at the center of the global regulatory network. It failed to act as a first mover in setting global trade identification standards (legal entity identifiers), and it has not been able to establish a core of global data warehouses. This is largely the result of unilateral action by FSB members. In particular, legislators in member countries have undermined FSB-led efforts by refusing to remove legal barriers to transnational regulatory cooperation and, in some instances, by erecting new ones.

Advancing Innovations in Renewable Energy Technologies as Alternatives to Fossil Fuel Use in the Middle East

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damilola S Olawuyi
Keyword(s):  
Renewable Energy ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Renewable Energy Sources ◽  
Low Carbon ◽  
Electricity Grid ◽  
Energy Technologies ◽  
Gulf Countries ◽  
Environmentally Responsible ◽  
Legal Frameworks ◽  
Legal Barriers

Despite increasing political emphasis across the Middle East on the need to transition to lower carbon, efficient, and environmentally responsible energy systems and economies, legal innovations required to drive such transitions have not been given detailed analysis and consideration. This chapter develops a profile of law and governance innovations required to integrate and balance electricity generated from renewable energy sources (RES-E) with extant electricity grid structures in the Middle East, especially Gulf countries. It discusses the absence of renewable energy laws, the lack of legal frameworks on public–private partnerships, lack of robust pricing and financing, and lack of dedicated RES-E institutional framework. These are the main legal barriers that must be addressed if current national visions of a low-carbon transition across the Middle East are to move from mere political aspirations to realization.

Mitigation and Adaptation through Environmental Impact Assessment Litigation: Rethinking the Prospect of Climate Change Litigation in China

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Xiangbai He
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Environmental Impact ◽  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Environmental Impact Assessment ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Mitigation And Adaptation ◽  
Regulatory Effects ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Barriers

Abstract There are two general pathways towards climate change litigation in China: tort-based litigation to hold carbon emitters accountable in civil law, and administrative litigation against the government to demand better climate regulation. While the first pathway is gaining momentum among Chinese scholars, this article argues that legal barriers to applying tort-based rules to climate change should be fairly acknowledged. The article argues that China's legal framework for environmental impact assessment (EIA) provides more openness and flexibility for the resolution of climate change disputes. Therefore, EIA-based climate lawsuits, which challenge environmental authorities for not adequately taking climate change factors into account in decision-making processes, encounter relatively fewer legal barriers, require less radical legal or institutional reform, and have greater potential to maintain existing legal orders. The regulatory effects produced by EIA-based litigation suggest that the scholarship on climate change litigation in China should take such litigation seriously because it could influence both governments and emitters in undertaking more proactive efforts. This China-based study, with a special focus on judicial practice in the largest developing country, will shine a light on China's contribution to transnational climate litigation.

NATIONAL AFFAIRS

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 226-275
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Renewable Energy Sources ◽  
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation ◽  
Energy Sources ◽  
Barrier Reef ◽  
Global Responsibility ◽  
Maritime Spatial Planning ◽  
Legal Barriers ◽  
Fukushima Disaster

Japan - Fukushima Disaster and Reform "Jotaro Yokoyama" 226 Nigeria - Renewable Energy Sources "Legal Barriers and Potential" (Damilola S. Olawuyi) 233 India - Greenhouse Gas Mitigation "Bharat H. Desai" 238 Bangladesh - Climate Change and Vulnerability "Local and Global Responsibility" (Md. Kamal Uddin) 252 Australia - The Great Barrier Reef "Maritime Spatial Planning" (Daud Hassan) 259 South Africa - Mining and Legal Measures "Michael Kabai" 270

scholarly journals A New Pricing Model for Crude Oil Pre-Sale Units via SPFO (Standard Parallel Forward with Options) in Iran

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Ghasem Nikjou ◽  
Hamed Najafi ◽  
Kamran Salmani
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Oil Industry ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Forward Security ◽  
Option Pricing Model ◽  
Oil And Gas Resources ◽  
Offshore Oil And Gas ◽  
Offshore Oil ◽  
Legal Barriers

Nowadays energy has an important role as a driving sector of economy. Forecasting 150 billion dollars investment in energy sector during the fifth development program in Iran, the banking and financial system require a dynamic and modern economy and financial instruments. Obviously, this approach needs to remove legal barriers and modification of contracts. Financing in the oil industry has faced with serious challenges in recent years. In addition, investing in common offshore oil and gas resources is indispensable. Accordingly we are going to design a new contract which is called Oil SPFO (Standard Parallel Forward security with two Options under betting condition), in order to raise funds needed. In this article we would investigate the SPFO for Iran Ministry of Petroleum (MOP)’s finance and present a model for pricing the oil SPFO based on Black and Scholes option pricing model. Finally, we have some recommendations to develop the oil SPFO and suggest that other researchers work on pricing the oil parallel forward securities according to this model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document