scholarly journals Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors: A Potential Target for Regulation of Proliferation and Differentiation of an Immortalized Human Neural Stem Cell Line

2014 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Ladeby Erichsen ◽  
Morten Blaabjerg ◽  
Helle Bogetofte ◽  
Alberto Martinez Serrano ◽  
Morten Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Glutamate Receptors ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors ◽  
Stem Cell Line ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate ◽  
Human Neural Stem Cell ◽  
Group I ◽  
Neural Stem Cell Line ◽  
Proliferation And Differentiation ◽  
Regulation Of Proliferation

Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Are Differentially Expressed by Two Populations of Olfactory Bulb Granule Cells

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 3136-3141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Heinbockel ◽  
Kathryn A. Hamilton ◽  
Matthew Ennis
Keyword(s):  
Olfactory Bulb ◽  
Glutamate Receptors ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors ◽  
Granule Cells ◽  
Mitral Cell ◽  
Mitral Cells ◽  
Patch Clamp Recording ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate ◽  
Group I ◽  
Bath Application

In the main olfactory bulb, several populations of granule cells (GCs) can be distinguished based on the soma location either superficially, interspersed with mitral cells within the mitral cell layer (MCL), or deeper, within the GC layer (GCL). Little is known about the physiological properties of superficial GCs (sGCs) versus deep GCs (dGCs). Here, we used patch-clamp recording methods to explore the role of Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in regulating the activity of GCs in slices from wildtype and mGluR−/− mutant mice. In wildtype mice, bath application of the selective Group I mGluR agonist DHPG depolarized and increased the firing rate of both GC subtypes. In the presence of blockers of fast synaptic transmission (APV, CNQX, gabazine), DHPG directly depolarized both GC subtypes, although the two GC subtypes responded differentially to DHPG in mGluR1−/− and mGluR5−/− mice. DHPG depolarized sGCs in slices from mGluR5−/− mice, although it had no effect on sGCs in slices from mGluR1−/− mice. By contrast, DHPG depolarized dGCs in slices from mGluR1−/− mice but had no effect on dGCs in slices from mGluR5−/− mice. Previous studies showed that mitral cells express mGluR1 but not mGluR5. The present results therefore suggest that sGCs are more similar to mitral cells than dGCs in terms of mGluR expression.

scholarly journals Activity-dependent regulation of synaptic strength by PSD-95 in CA1 neurons

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 1058-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
John E. Lisman
Keyword(s):  
Glutamate Receptors ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors ◽  
Hippocampal Slices ◽  
Long Term Potentiation ◽  
Synaptic Strength ◽  
Ca1 Neurons ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate ◽  
Group I ◽  
Term Potentiation ◽  
Activity Dependent

CaMKII and PSD-95 are the two most abundant postsynaptic proteins in the postsynaptic density (PSD). Overexpression of either can dramatically increase synaptic strength and saturate long-term potentiation (LTP). To do so, CaMKII must be activated, but the same is not true for PSD-95; expressing wild-type PSD-95 is sufficient. This raises the question of whether PSD-95's effects are simply an equilibrium process [increasing the number of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) slots] or whether activity is somehow involved. To examine this question, we blocked activity in cultured hippocampal slices with TTX and found that the effects of PSD-95 overexpression were greatly reduced. We next studied the type of receptors involved. The effects of PSD-95 were prevented by antagonists of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) but not by antagonists of ionotropic glutamate receptors. The inhibition of PSD-95-induced strengthening was not simply a result of inhibition of PSD-95 synthesis. To understand the mechanisms involved, we tested the role of CaMKII. Overexpression of a CaMKII inhibitor, CN19, greatly reduced the effect of PSD-95. We conclude that PSD-95 cannot itself increase synaptic strength simply by increasing the number of AMPAR slots; rather, PSD-95's effects on synaptic strength require an activity-dependent process involving mGluR and CaMKII.

The role of neuroglial metabotropic glutamate receptors in Alzheimer's disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled S. Abd-Elrahman ◽  
Shaarika Sarasija ◽  
Stephen S. G. Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Glutamate Receptors ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Neuronal Cell ◽  
Hyperphosphorylated Tau ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate ◽  
Group I ◽  
The Brain

: Glutamate, the major excitatory neurotramitter in the brain exerts its effects via both ionotropic glutamate receptors and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). There are three subgroups of mGluRs, pre-synaptic Group II and Group III mGluRs and post-synaptic Group I mGluRs. mGluRs are ubiquitously expressed in the brain and their activation is poised upstream of a myriad of signaling pathways, resulting in their implication in the pathogenesis of various neurodegenerative diseases including, Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While the exact mechanism of AD etiology remains elusive, β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau tangles remain the histopathological hallmarks of AD. Though less electrically excitable, neuroglia are a major non-neuronal cell type in the brain and are composed of astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes. Astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes provide structural and metabolic support, active immune defence, and axonal support and sheathing, respectively. Interestingly, Aβ and hyperphosphorylated tau are known to disrupt the neuroglial homeostasis in the brain, pushing them towards a more neurotoxic state. In this review, we discuss what is currently known regarding the expression patterns of various mGluRs in neuroglia and how Aβ and tau alter the normal mGluR function in the neuroglia and contribute to the pathophysiology of AD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document