Faecal calprotectin effectively excludes inflammatory bowel disease in 789 symptomatic young adults with/without alarm symptoms: a prospective UK primary care cohort study

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1103-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Walker ◽  
L. Moore ◽  
N. Heerasing ◽  
P. Hendy ◽  
M. H. Perry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

scholarly journals Faecal calprotectin to detect inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of test accuracy

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e027428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karoline Freeman ◽  
Brian H Willis ◽  
Hannah Fraser ◽  
Sian Taylor-Phillips ◽  
Aileen Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

ObjectiveTest accuracy of faecal calprotectin (FC) testing in primary care is inconclusive. We aimed to assess the test accuracy of FC testing in primary care and compare it to secondary care estimates for the detection of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy using a bivariate random effects model. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science until 31 May 2017 and included studies from auto alerts up until 31 January 2018. Eligible studies measured FC levels in stool samples to detect IBD in adult patients with chronic (at least 6–8 weeks) abdominal symptoms in primary or secondary care. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 criteria. We followed the protocol registered as PROSPERO CRD 42012003287.Results38 out of 2168 studies were eligible including five from primary care. Comparison of test accuracy by setting was precluded by extensive heterogeneity. Overall, summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were not recorded. At a threshold of 50 µg/g, sensitivity from separate meta-analysis of four assay types ranged from 0.85 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.92) to 0.94 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.90) and specificity from 0.67 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.76) to 0.88 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.94). Across three different definitions of disease, sensitivity ranged from 0.80 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.84) to 0.97 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.99) and specificity from 0.67 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.75) to 0.76 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84). Sensitivity appears to be lower in primary care and is further reduced at a revised threshold of 100 µg/g.ConclusionsConclusive estimates of sensitivity and specificity of FC testing in primary care for the detection of IBD are still missing. There is insufficient evidence in the published literature to support the decision to introduce FC testing in primary care. Studies evaluating FC testing in an appropriate primary care setting are needed.

scholarly journals Unrestricted faecal calprotectin testing performs poorly in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in patients in primary care

2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Conroy ◽  
Melissa F Hale ◽  
Simon S Cross ◽  
Kirsty Swallow ◽  
Reena H Sidhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Irritable Bowel ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Single Laboratory

BackgroundFaecal calprotectin (FC) measurement distinguishes patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from those with irritable bowel syndrome but evidence of its performance in primary care is limited.AimsTo assess the yield of IBD from FC testing in primary care.MethodsRetrospective review of hospital records to assess the outcome following FC testing in primary care. Investigations for all patients undergoing FC testing in a single laboratory for 6 months from 1 October 2013 to 28 February 2014 were reviewed.Results410 patients (162 male; median age 42; range 16–91) were included. FC>50 µg/g was considered positive (FC+). 148/410 (36.1%; median age 44 (17–91)) were FC+ (median FC 116.5 µg/g (51–1770)). 122/148 FC-positive patients (82.4%) underwent further investigation. 97 (65.5%) underwent lower gastrointestinal endoscopy (LGIE), of which 7 (7.2%) had IBD. 49/262 (18.7%) FC-negative (FC−) patients (FC ≤50 µg/g) (median age 47 (19–76)) also underwent LGIE, of whom 3 (6.1%) had IBD.IBD was diagnosed in 11/410 (2.7%; 4 ulcerative colitis, 3 Crohn’s disease, 4 microscopic colitis). 8/11 were FC+ (range 67–1170) and 3 FC−. At a 50 µg/g threshold, sensitivity for detecting IBD was 72.7%, specificity 64.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 5.41% and negative predictive value 98.9%. Increasing the threshold to 100 µg/g reduced the sensitivity of the test for detecting IBD to 54.6%.ConclusionsFC testing in primary care has low sensitivity and specificity with poor PPV for diagnosing IBD. Its use needs to be directed to those with a higher pretest probability of disease. Local services and laboratories should advise general practitioners accordingly.

scholarly journals Incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in UK primary care: a population-based cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e036584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Joshua Pasvol ◽  
Laura Horsfall ◽  
Stuart Bloom ◽  
Anthony Walter Segal ◽  
Caroline Sabin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Average Decrease ◽  
Primary Care Patients ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Incident Cases

ObjectivesWe describe temporal trends in the recorded incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in UK primary care patients between 2000 and 2018.DesignA cohort study.SettingThe IQVIA Medical Research data (IMRD) primary care database.ParticipantsAll individuals registered with general practices contributing to IMRD during the period 01 January 2000–31 December 2018.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the recorded diagnosis of IBD.Results11 325 025 individuals were included and 65 700 IBD cases were identified, of which 22 560 were incident diagnoses made during the study period. Overall, there were 8077 incident cases of Crohn’s disease (CD) and 12 369 incident cases of ulcerative colitis (UC). Crude incidence estimates of ‘IBD overall’, CD and UC were 28.6 (28.2 to 28.9), 10.2 (10.0 to 10.5) and 15.7 (15.4 to 15.9)/100 000 person years, respectively. No change in IBD incidence was observed for adults aged 17–40 years and children aged 0–9 years. However, for adults aged over 40 years, incidence fell from 37.8 (34.5 to 41.4) to 23.6 (21.3 to 26.0)/100 000 person years (average decrease 2.3% (1.9 to 2.7)/year (p<0.0001)). In adolescents aged 10–16 years, incidence rose from 13.1 (8.4 to 19.5) to 25.4 (19.5 to 32.4)/100 000 person years (average increase 3.0% (1.7 to 4.3)/year (p<0.0001)). Point prevalence estimates on 31 December 2018 for IBD overall, CD and UC were 725, 276 and 397 per 100 000 people, respectively.ConclusionsThis is one of the largest studies ever undertaken to investigate trends in IBD epidemiology. Although we observed stable or falling incidence of IBD in adults, our results are consistent with some of the highest reported global incidence and prevalence rates for IBD, with a 94% rise in incidence in adolescents. Further investigation is required to understand the aetiological drivers.

scholarly journals DOP51 De-escalation of biological therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients following prior escalation

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S086-S086
Author(s):  
P Thomas ◽  
L Smits ◽  
M Te Groen ◽  
R West ◽  
M Russel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Endoscopic Remission ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Biological Dose ◽  
Trough Levels

Abstract Background There are limited data available on de-escalation of biological therapy after prior escalation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and success rate of de-escalation of biological therapy in IBD patients after prior dose escalation and evaluate which measures are used prior to de-escalation. Methods This multicentre, prospective, cohort study enrolled IBD patients treated with infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA) or vedolizumab (VEDO) in whom therapy was de-escalated at least once after prior biological escalation. Objective disease measures for de-escalation were defined as faecal calprotectin ≤ 200 µg/g and/or therapeutic or supratherapeutic trough levels and/or radiologic or endoscopic remission. Successful de-escalation was defined as remaining on the same or lower biological dose for ≥6 months after de-escalation. Results In total, 206 IFX users, 85 ADA users and 55 VEDO users underwent therapy escalation. Of these, 34 (17%) patients on IFX, 18 (21%) patients on ADA and 8 (15%) patients on VEDO had received at least one subsequent de-escalation. De-escalation was successful in 91% of IFX patients, 89% of ADA patients and 100% of VEDO patients. The probability of remaining on the de-escalated regimen or further de-escalation after 1 year was 85% for IFX, 62% for ADA and 100% for VEDO. De-escalation based on objective disease measures was performed in 67% of all de-escalations. Objective de-escalations were successful in 98% versus 80% of subjective de-escalations. Conclusion De-escalation after biological escalation is successful in the majority of patients. Objective markers of remission increase the likelihood of successful de-escalation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document