scholarly journals Liver stiffness measurement reliability and main determinants of point shear-wave elastography in patients with chronic liver disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fraquelli ◽  
A. Baccarin ◽  
G. Casazza ◽  
C. B. Conti ◽  
M. Giunta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Measurement Reliability ◽  
Liver Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Main Determinants

Liver Stiffness Assessed by Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography from General Electric Accurately Predicts Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Patients with Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (05) ◽  
pp. 526-533
Author(s):  
Horia Stefanescu ◽  
Corina Rusu ◽  
Monica Lupsor-Platon ◽  
Oana Nicoara Farcau ◽  
Petra Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
General Electric ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Purpose Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is responsible for most of the complications in patients with cirrhosis. Liver stiffness (LS) measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is currently used to evaluate CSPH. Bi-dimensional shear wave elastography from General Electric (2D-SWE.GE) has not yet been validated for the diagnosis of PHT. Our aims were to test whether 2D-SWE.GE-LS is able to evaluate CSPH, to determine the reliability criteria of the method and to compare its accuracy with that of VCTE-LS in this clinical setting. Materials and Methods Patients with chronic liver disease referred to hepatic catheterization (HVPG) were consecutively enrolled. HVPG and LS by both VCTE and 2D-SWE.GE were performed on the same day. The diagnostic performance of each LS method was compared against HVPG and between each other. Results 2D-SWE.GE-LS was possible in 123/127 (96.90 %) patients. The ability to record at least 5 LS measurements by 2D-SWE.GE and IQR < 30 % were the only features associated with reliable results. 2D-SWE.GE-LS was highly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.704; p < 0.0001), especially if HVPG < 10 mmHg and was significantly higher in patients with CSPH (15.52 vs. 8.14 kPa; p < 0.0001). For a cut-off value of 11.3 kPa, the AUROC of 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was 0.91, which was not inferior to VCTE-LS (0.92; p = 0.79). The diagnostic accuracy of LS by 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was similar with the one of VCTE-LS (83.74 % vs. 85.37 %; p = 0.238). The diagnostic accuracy was not enhanced by using different cut-off values which enhanced the sensitivity or the specificity. However, in the subgroup of compensated patients with alcoholic liver disease, 2D-SWE.GE-LS classified CSPH better than VCTE-LS (93.33 % vs. 85.71 %, p = 0.039). Conclusion 2D-SWE.GE-LS has good accuracy, not inferior to VCTE-LS, for the diagnosis of CSPH.

scholarly journals Are we missing varices by implementing Baveno-VI recommendation of not screening patients with Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease?

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiza Sadaqat Ali ◽  
Nimrah Bader ◽  
Bader Faiyaz Zuberi ◽  
Tazeen Rasheed
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Liver Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objectives: This study aimed to validate Baveno-VI recommendations for variceal screening in cACLD in our region and proposed our own cutoff values. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on cACLD patients from August 2020 till April 2021. Patients segregated into Group-A, having Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) of ≥ 20 kPa and platelet of ≤ 150 × 109 cells/L; and Group-B having LSM of < 20 kPa and PLT of > 150 × 109 cells/L. Gastroscopic findings were segregated into three categories, VNT, Varices Not Needing Treatment (VNNT) and No Varix (NV). ROC plots were generated for LSM and Platelet for VNT for sensitivity, specificity, Negative and Positive Predictive Values were calculated. Results: A total of 134 patients of cACLD were included. Group-A had 72 (53.7%) patients and Group-B had 62 (46.3%) patients. Group-A had 6 (8.3%) NV; 18 (25.0%) VNNT and 48 (66.7%) VNT. Group-B had 26 (41.9%) NV, 24 (38.7%) VNNT and 12 (19.4%) VNT. The sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 80.6% and NPV of 67.56% was obtained. Thus 19.4% VNT were missed on following Baveno VI recommendations. ROC in our study suggested cutoff value of 11.5 kPa with sensitivity of 100% and 1-sepcifity pf 78% (AUROC = 0.865; p < .001) of LSM below which screening gastroscopy could be avoided. The positive and negative predicted values for 84.85% and 100% respectively. Cut off value of platelet count for VNNT came out to be ≥ 97.5 × 109 cells/L with AUROC 0.891 (p < .001), having sensitivity of 100 % and 1-specificity of 83.3%. Conclusions: Substantial number of VNT in cACLD patients are missed by following Baveno-VI recommendations and these needs to be revised on regional basis. List If Abbreviations: AASLD: American Association for Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), AUROC: Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic, cACLD: Compensated Advance Chronic Liver Disease (cACLD), CTP: Child-Turcotte-Pugh, DCLD: Decompensated Chronic Liver Disease (DCLD), EV: Esophageal Varices, KPa: Kilo Pascal, LSM: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM), NPV: Negative Predictive Value, NV: No Varix (NV)., PPV: Positive Predictive Value, ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic, VNNT: Varices Not Needing Treatment (VNNT) and VNT: Varices Needing Treatment (VNT). How to cite this:Ali FS, Bader N, Zuberi BF, Rasheed T. Are we missing varices by implementing Baveno-VI recommendation of not screening patients with Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease? Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(1):---------.  doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.1.4796 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY AND SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY OF LIVER IN PATIENTS OF CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE.

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
Vikas Poonia ◽  
Kuldeep mendiratta ◽  
Menu bagaratta ◽  
Usha jaipal
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Wave Pressure ◽  
Medical College ◽  
The Comparative Study

we aim to compare transient elastography and shear wave elastography in chronic liver disease patients for liver stiffness. Our objective was to calculate mean shear wave pressure by transient elastography and shear wave elastography methods and to compare the outcome of these two methods.A total of 190 Chronic Liver disease patients who clinically recommended transient elastography and shear wave elastography in Department of Radiodiagnosis SMS Medical College Jaipur.The mean shear wave pressure for transient elastography and ultrasound shear wave elastography was 10.77±6.88 and 10.88±7.05, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document