Dyadic Listening in Teams: Social Relations Model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avraham N. Kluger ◽  
Thomas E. Malloy ◽  
Sarit Pery ◽  
Guy Itzchakov ◽  
Dotan R. Castro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Social Relations Model

Meta-Accuracy and Perceived Reciprocity From the Perception-Meta-Perception Social Relations Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-37
Author(s):  
Ben Porter ◽  
Camilla S. Øverup ◽  
Julie A. Brunson ◽  
Paras D. Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Latent Variables ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Complete Understanding ◽  
Social Relations Model ◽  
Flexible Framework ◽  
Multilevel Structural Equation

Abstract. Meta-accuracy and perceptions of reciprocity can be measured by covariances between latent variables in two social relations models examining perception and meta-perception. We propose a single unified model called the Perception-Meta-Perception Social Relations Model (PM-SRM). This model simultaneously estimates all possible parameters to provide a more complete understanding of the relationships between perception and meta-perception. We describe the components of the PM-SRM and present two pedagogical examples with code, openly available on https://osf.io/4ag5m . Using a new package in R (xxM), we estimated the model using multilevel structural equation modeling which provides an approachable and flexible framework for evaluating the PM-SRM. Further, we discuss possible expansions to the PM-SRM which can explore novel and exciting hypotheses.

Projection and Mirror Effects in Cross-group Interactions: A Social Relations Model Study of Similarity Perceptions

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Niels Christensen ◽  
Kate Duangdao ◽  
Hayley Isaacs ◽  
Leola Alfonso-Reese
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Group Interactions ◽  
Social Relations Model ◽  
Model Study ◽  
Mirror Effects

A description and illustration of the Triadic Relations Model: Who perceives whom as bullying whom?

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noel A. Card ◽  
Philip C. Rodkin ◽  
Claire F. Garandeau
Keyword(s):  
Peer Relations ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Fourth Grade ◽  
Social Relations Model ◽  
Interpersonal Behaviors ◽  
The Social ◽  
Peer Nominations ◽  
Dyadic Variables

Analyses of children’s peer relations have recently begun considering interpersonal behaviors and perceptions from the perspective of the Social Relations Model. An extension of this model, the Triadic Relations Model (TRM), allows for consideration and analysis of more complex three-person data to understand triadic processes; separate individual, dyadic, and triadic variance; and model co-occurrences among dyadic phenomena. The goal of this article is to provide a didactic introduction to the TRM and its potential for studying peer relations. The TRM is applied to data from nine classes (N = 162) of third and fourth grade boys and girls involving perceptions (peer nominations) of actors’ (aggressors’) behavior toward partners (victims). We report and illustrate interpretation of 7 variance and 16 covariance estimates from this TRM analysis of who perceives whom as bullying whom. In particular, triadic analyses revealed a tendency for children to perceive others as sharing the same aggressors and the same targets for aggression as themselves. We discuss implications of findings for studying aggression, as well as extensions of this model, such as incorporating multiple constructs or connecting the TRM estimates with individual and dyadic variables, and challenges of using the TRM.

From Dating to Mating and Relating: Predictors of Initial and Long–Term Outcomes of Speed–Dating in a Community Sample

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens B. Asendorpf ◽  
Lars Penke ◽  
Mitja D. Back
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Physical Attractiveness ◽  
Romantic Relationship ◽  
Community Sample ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Social Relations Model ◽  
Speed Dating ◽  
Partner Similarity

We studied initial and long–term outcomes of speed–dating over a period of 1 year in a community sample involving 382 participants aged 18–54 years. They were followed from their initial choices of dating partners up to later mating (sexual intercourse) and relating (romantic relationship). Using Social Relations Model analyses, we examined evolutionarily informed hypotheses on both individual and dyadic effects of participants’ physical characteristics, personality, education and income on their dating, mating and relating. Both men and women based their choices mainly on the dating partners’ physical attractiveness, and women additionally on men's sociosexuality, openness to experience, shyness, education and income. Choosiness increased with age in men, decreased with age in women and was positively related to popularity among the other sex, but mainly for men. Partner similarity had only weak effects on dating success. The chance for mating with a speed–dating partner was 6%, and was increased by men's short–term mating interest; the chance for relating was 4%, and was increased by women's long–term mating interest. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

scholarly journals A family assessment based on the Social Relations Model

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan De Mol ◽  
Ann Buysse ◽  
William L. Cook
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Family Assessment ◽  
Social Relations Model ◽  
The Social
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document