IS A SOCIAL EMPOWERMENT OF PPP FOR INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY POSSIBLE? LESSONS FROM SOCIAL IMPACT BONDS

2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica VECCHI ◽  
Francesca CASALINI
Keyword(s):  
Social Impact ◽  
Social Impact Bonds ◽  
Social Empowerment

Payment by Results and Social Impact Bonds

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
KEVIN ALBERTSON ◽  
CHRIS FOX ◽  
CHRIS O’LEARY ◽  
GARY PAINTER ◽  
KIMBERLY BAILEY ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Impact ◽  
Social Impact Bonds

Social impact bonds and their implications for third sector organisations: experiences from the Netherlands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Patetta ◽  
Marta Enciso Santocildes
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Third Sector ◽  
The United States ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Social ◽  
Private Investments ◽  
Social Impact Bonds ◽  
Third Sector Organisations

The social impact bond (SIB) is defined as a form of payment-by-results scheme combining governmental payments with private investments. This paper explores the motivations and implications of three third sector organisations (TSOs) participating in SIBs in Continental Europe. It offers an understanding of the involvement of TSOs in this type of scheme; and it shares insights about a context that is different from the United Kingdom and the United States – the Netherlands – which presents the opportunity to expand our knowledge about SIBs.

scholarly journals Does a Payment-for-Outcomes Model Improve Indigenous Wellbeing? Commissioning Agencies and Social Impact Bonds in New Zealand

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Louise Humpage
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Policy Innovation ◽  
Social Outcomes ◽  
Nation States ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Social Impact Bonds ◽  
Funding Mechanisms ◽  
The Government

Commissioning agencies and social impact bonds are two examples of New Zealand’s shift towards payment-for-outcomes funding mechanisms over the last decade, as the government attempted to improve both policy innovation and social outcomes. This article highlights that although the commissioning agencies have been more successful than social impact bonds, neither has completely achieved these goals of innovation and improved outcomes. This is particularly concerning given Indigenous Māori are disproportionately impacted by both policies. Discussion concludes by highlighting some of the problems associated with applying a payment-for-outcomes model to Indigenous Peoples, given these funding mechanisms are becoming increasingly popular in other settler nation states.

scholarly journals Social Impact Bonds in Bangladesh: Saving a Million Life Years and Healthcare Costs

IARJSET ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 55-62
Author(s):  
Deena Mehjabeen ◽  
ASM Amanullah PhD
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Social Impact Bonds
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document