More severe intellectual disability found in teenagers compared to younger children with Down syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 961-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrika Wester Oxelgren ◽  
Åsa Myrelid ◽  
Göran Annerén ◽  
Joakim Westerlund ◽  
Jan Gustafsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Children With Down Syndrome ◽  
Severe Intellectual Disability

Services for Children with Down Syndrome

1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46
Author(s):  
Phil Foreman
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Older Children ◽  
Children With Down Syndrome ◽  
School Aged Children ◽  
Severe Intellectual Disability ◽  
School Placement ◽  
Health And Development

Parents of 221 school-aged children with Down syndrome completed a questionnaire about their experiences with service-providers from the time of diagnosis of their child’s disability. These experiences were compared with those of 782 parents of children with moderate or severe intellectual disability, with disabilities other than Down syndrome. Down syndrome was the earliest diagnosed disability, the average age of suspicion being two weeks and of diagnosis four weeks. Two-thirds of the children with Down syndrome had at least one additional disability, some having up to four additional disabilities. Some differences were apparent between older and younger children in the sample. Parents of younger children with Down syndrome were less likely to report inaccurate predictions about their child’s health and development. Children with Down syndrome were significantly more likely than children with other disabilities to be receiving speech therapy and significantly less likely to be receiving occupational therapy or physiotherapy. Parents of younger children with Down syndrome were more likely than parents of older children with Down syndrome or of children with other disabilities to regard an integrated school placement as ideal for their child, and their children were more likely to be in integrated settings.

scholarly journals Intellectual potential of pupils with Down syndrome and diagnosed intellectual disability in the opinion of their parents

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystyna Popowska
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Speech Communication ◽  
Special Schools ◽  
Children With Down Syndrome ◽  
Governmental Organizations ◽  
Non Governmental Organizations ◽  
The Social ◽  
Intellectual Potential ◽  
E Mail

Research was conducted to find out about the parents’ opinions on the intellectual potential of their children with Down syndrome and diagnosed intellectual disability studying in 4–8 grades of common, integration and special schools. Additionally, the factors determining the respondents’ opinions were analyzed. The paper uses the author’s questionnaire was placed on groups for parents of children with Down syndrome on the social network site Facebook. In addition, surveys were sent by e-mail to the primary school districts and non-governmental organizations that help children with Down syndrome. Fifty two questionnaires were collected. The results indicate that, despite intellectual disability, parents recognize the intellectual potential of their children. It can be assumed that assessments of the intellectual potential of students with Down syndrome and diagnosed intellectual disability are determined by their siblings in the intellectual norm, gender, using verbal speech, communication skills, social skills and opinions of their parents about their successes in school and progress as a result of the therapy. 

scholarly journals Observational Assessment and Maternal Reports of Motivation in Children and Adolescents With Down Syndrome

2011 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Gilmore ◽  
Monica Cuskelly
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Observational Assessment ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Children With Down Syndrome ◽  
Maternal Reports

Abstract Despite a lack of consistent empirical evidence, there has been an ongoing assumption that intellectual disability is associated with reduced levels of motivation. The participants in this study were 33 children with Down syndrome ages 10–15 years and 33 typically developing 3–8-year-old children. Motivation was measured through observational assessments of curiosity, preference for challenge, and persistence, as well as maternal reports. There were no significant group differences on motivation tasks, but mothers of children with Down syndrome rated their children significantly lower on motivation than did parents of typically developing children. There were some intriguing group differences in the pattern of correlations among observations and parent reports. The findings challenge long-held views that individuals with intellectual disability are invariably deficient in motivation.

scholarly journals Teaching Individuals with Down Syndrome and Moderate or Severe Intellectual Disability with The Aim of Their Acquiring, Retaining and Recalling Knowledge: An Intervention Programme for Discovering and Understanding the Environment

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Christina S Lappa ◽  
Constantinos N Mantzikos
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Intervention Program ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Intervention Programme ◽  
Baseline Design ◽  
Human Food ◽  
Severe Intellectual Disability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Food Grain

<p class="p1">Three adults with Down syndrome (DS, hereafter) and moderate or severe intellectual disability were taught the growth stages of wheat (cultivation, tillage, threshing), the products that are derived from it<del cite="mailto:reviewer" datetime="2021-10-24T06:08">,</del> and how this staple human food grain is produced, with the aim of their acquiring knowledge, retaining it and being able to recall it from memory. A quasi-experimental baseline design was implemented. The participants were taught using questions and images, and their answers were examined and re-examined after withdrawing the initial training tools (questions and images) in order to show whether they were able to acquire, retain and recall the knowledge. The intervention program<ins cite="mailto:reviewer" datetime="2021-10-24T06:05">me</ins> lasted two months. In order to check the effectiveness of the intervention and the maintenance of the new information<ins cite="mailto:reviewer" datetime="2021-10-24T11:16">,</ins> as well as to draw the respective conclusions, evaluations were carried out before the intervention, <del cite="mailto:reviewer" datetime="2021-10-24T06:10">right </del><ins cite="mailto:reviewer" datetime="2021-10-24T06:10">immediately </ins>after it<ins cite="mailto:reviewer" datetime="2021-10-24T06:10"> and </ins><del cite="mailto:reviewer" datetime="2021-10-24T06:10">, but also </del>two weeks after its completion. The results showed that the three participants acquired knowledge about the growth stages of wheat, its products<del cite="mailto:reviewer" datetime="2021-10-24T06:10">,</del> and this staple human food, they retained that knowledge and were able to recall and narrate it in two subsequent probes conducted one and two weeks after the initial probe without the help of questions and images. The results of this intervention show that individuals with DS and moderate or severe intellectual disability can be educated and acquire knowledge, as well as retain and recall it. An additional important finding is that repeated recalling of knowledge promotes long-term retention.</p>

scholarly journals Potencjał intelektualny uczniów z zespołem Downa i orzeczoną niepełnosprawnością intelektualną w opinii ich rodziców

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystyna Popowska
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Speech Communication ◽  
Special Schools ◽  
Children With Down Syndrome ◽  
Governmental Organizations ◽  
Non Governmental Organizations ◽  
The Social ◽  
Intellectual Potential ◽  
E Mail

Research was conducted to find out about the parents’ opinions on the intellectual potential of their children with Down syndrome and diagnosed intellectual disability studying in 4–8 grades of common, integration and special schools. Additionally, the factors determining the respondents’ opinions were analyzed. The paper uses the author’s questionnaire was placed on groups for parents of children with Down syndrome on the social network site Facebook. In addition, surveys were sent by e-mail to the primary school districts and non-governmental organizations that help children with Down syndrome. Fifty two questionnaires were collected. The results indicate that, despite intellectual disability, parents recognize the intellectual potential of their children. It can be assumed that assessments of the intellectual potential of students with Down syndrome and diagnosed intellectual disability are determined by their siblings in the intellectual norm, gender, using verbal speech, communication skills, social skills and opinions of their parents about their successes in school and progress as a result of the therapy. 

A Qualitative Analysis of Imitation Performances of Preschoolers With Down Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-275
Author(s):  
Marleen Vanvuchelen
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Language Abilities ◽  
Children With Down Syndrome ◽  
Characteristic Strength ◽  
Cognitive Phenotype ◽  
Mental Language ◽  
Production Errors

Abstract A number of studies suggest that imitation is a characteristic strength in children with Down Syndrome (DS). The present study aims to discover whether imitation performances are qualitatively phenotypical in DS. Eight preschoolers with DS were matched on chronological, mental, language and imitation age with 8 preschoolers with intellectual disability of undifferentiated etiology (ID-UND). Imitation performances on the Preschool Imitation and Praxis Scale were videotaped for blind scoring on 30 possible errors. Children with DS made fewer production errors (synkinesias, OR 0.3 [0.1–0.7]), but more conceptual errors (substitution, OR 2.5 [1.6–3.9]) compared to children with ID-UND. This finding is in line with the view of a cognitive phenotype in DS, which is characterized by preserved visuospatial and impaired language abilities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document