scholarly journals One‐year visual outcomes and optical quality of femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction and Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) implantation for high myopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingling Niu ◽  
Huamao Miao ◽  
Mi Tian ◽  
Dan Fu ◽  
Xiaoying Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Optical Quality ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Implantable Collamer Lens ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Icl V4c ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals Implantable collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction for high myopia correction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Cao ◽  
Jingshang Zhang ◽  
Jinda Wang ◽  
Mayinuer Yusufu ◽  
Shanshan Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Safety Index ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Implantable Collamer Lens ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Efficacy Index

Abstract Purpose To compare the efficacy, safety, predictability and visual quality between implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction in adults. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. A comprehensive literature search was done based on databases including PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The efficacy index, safety index, changes in Snellen lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), predictability (difference between post-operative and attempted spherical equivalent error, SER), incidence of halos, and change in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were compared. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate continuous outcomes, risk ratio (RR) and 95%CI was used to estimate categorical outcomes. Results Five observational studies involving 555 eyes were included in this review. Studies’ sample sizes (eyes) ranged from 76 to 197. Subjects’ refraction ranged from -6 diopter (D) to -12D. Study duration of most researches were 6 months or 12 months. Compared to SMILE, ICL implantation showed better efficacy index (MD=0.09, 95%CI:0.01 to 0.16) and better safety index (MD=0.08, 95%CI: 0.00 to 0.16). Compared with SMILE, more ICL-treated eyes gained one or more Snellen lines of CDVA (RR=1.54, 95%CI:1.28 to 1.86), more gained two or more lines (RR=2.09, 95%CI:1.40 to 3.13), less lost one or more lines (RR=0.17, 95%CI:0.05 to 0.63). There was no difference in predictability between two treatments, RRs of predictability of within ±0.5D and ±1D were 1.13 (95%CI: 0.94 to 1.36) and 1.00 (95%CI: 0.98 to 1.02). Compared with SMILE, ICL implantation came with a higher risk of halos [RR=1.79, 95%CI: 1.48 to 2.16] and less increase in total HOAs (MD=-0.23, 95%CI: -0.42 to -0.03). Conclusion Compared with SMILE, ICL implantation showed a higher risk of halos, but equal performance on SER control, and better performance on efficacy index, safety index, CDVA improvement and HOAs control. Overall, ICL implantation might be a better choice for high myopia correction in adults.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for high myopia: a Meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanyan Fu ◽  
Yewei Yin ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Aiqun Xiang ◽  
Ying Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Spherical Aberration ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lenticule Extraction

Abstract Background To compare postoperative clinical outcomes of high myopia after being treated by Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).Methods Comprehensive studies were conducted on the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases.Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and the data were extracted by 2 independent authors, and the RevMan 5.3 version software were used in analyzing.Result Ten studies involving 637 patients (1093 eyes;575 eyes in the SMILE group and 518 eyes in the FS-LASIK group) were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled result revealed no significant differences in the following outcomes: the logMAR values of postoperative UDVA(WMD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02,0.00, I²=0%, P = 0.10 at postoperative 1mo; WMD =-0.01, 95% CI: -0.00 to 0.01, I²=0%,P = 0.35 at postoperative 3mo; WMD = -0.01, 95% CI:-0.02 to 0.01, I²=17%,P = 0.26 at long term), the logMAR values of postoperative CDVA(WMD = -0.02, 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.00, I²=0%, P = 0.11),and the postoperative mean refractive SE (WMD =0.02, 95% CI:0.04 to 0.08, I²=29%, P=0.60) . In the long-term observation, postoperative tHOA (WMD =-0.10, 95% CI:-0.13 to -0.07, I²=15%, P<0.00001)and postoperative spherical aberration (WMD =-0.13, 95% CI:--0.17 to -0.09, I²=38%, P<0.00001) were found to be less in the SMILE group compared with the FS-LASIK group, but no significant difference was found in postoperative coma (WMD =-0.02, 95% CI:-0.04 to 0.00, I²=98%, P=0.40).We also found greater PCE change post FS-LASIK than SMILE at long term follow-ups(WMD =-0.69, 95% CI:-1.36 to -0.01, I²=0%, P<0.05, however, there was no significant difference between the two groups at 3- or 6- months.(WMD =-0.19, 95% CI:-0.41 to 0.03, I²=31%, P=0.09;WMD =-0.20, 95% CI:-0.50 to 0.10, I²=17%, P=0.20)Conclusion For patients with high myopia, both SMILE and FS-LASIK are safe and efficacious. However, SMILE induced less tHOA and spherical aberration compared with FS-LASIK. Besides, FS-LASIK showed a greater increase in PCE than SMILE only at long term follow-ups. It remains to be seen whether the patients can get a better visual quality after SMILE and more comparative studies focused on high myopia is necessary.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for high myopia: A meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0242059
Author(s):  
Yanyan Fu ◽  
Yewei Yin ◽  
Xiaoying Wu ◽  
Yuanjun Li ◽  
Aiqun Xiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction

Aim To compare postoperative clinical outcomes of high myopia after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Methods From March 2018 to July 2020, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and several Chinese databases were comprehensively searched. The studies meeting the criteria were selected and included; the data were extracted by 2 independent authors. The clinical outcome parameters were analyzed with RevMan 5.3. Results This meta-analysis included twelve studies involving 766 patients (1400 eyes: 748 receiving SMILE and 652 receiving FS-LASIK). Pooled results revealed no significant differences in the following outcomes: the logarithm of the mean angle of resolution (logMAR) of postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.02 to 0.00, I2 = 0%, P = 0.07 at 1 mo; WMD = -0.00, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.01, I2 = 0%, P = 0.83 at 3 mo; WMD = -0.00, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.00, I2 = 32%, P = 0.33 in the long term), and the postoperative mean refractive spherical equivalent (WMD = -0.03, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.03, I2 = 13%, P = 0.30). However, the SMILE group had significantly better postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) than the FS-LASIK group (WMD = -0.04, 95% CI, -0.05 to -0.02, I2 = 0%, P<0.00001). In the long term, postoperative total higher-order aberration (WMD = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.10 to -0.07, I2 = 7%, P<0.00001) and postoperative spherical aberration (WMD = -0.15, 95% CI: -0.19 to -0.11, I2 = 29%, P<0.00001) were lower in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group; a significant difference was also found in postoperative coma (WMD = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.06 to -0.03, I2 = 30%, P<0.00001). Conclusion For patients with high myopia, both SMILE and FS-LASIK are safe, efficacious and predictable. However, the SMILE group demonstrated advantages over the FS-LASIK group in terms of postoperative CDVA, while SMILE induced less aberration than FS-LASIK. It remains to be seen whether SMILE can provide better visual quality than FS-LASIK; further comparative studies focused on high myopia are necessary.

scholarly journals One-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): mild to moderate myopia vs. high myopia

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Ryun Kim ◽  
Bu Ki Kim ◽  
Su Joung Mun ◽  
Young Taek Chung ◽  
Hyun Seung Kim
Keyword(s):  
High Myopia ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction ◽  
One Year

Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering After Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 296-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huamao Miao ◽  
Li He ◽  
Yang Shen ◽  
Meiyan Li ◽  
Yongfu Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Optical Quality ◽  
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lenticule Extraction
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document