scholarly journals Is there still a role of macular laser treatment in branch retinal vein occlusion in the era of intravitreal injections?

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-21
Author(s):  
Anne Møller Stenner ◽  
Katrine Hartmund Frederiksen ◽  
Jakob Grauslund
Keyword(s):  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Vein Occlusion

Treatment of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion with single or multiple intravitreal injections of bevacizumab

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Yunoki ◽  
Akio Miyakoshi ◽  
Tomoko Nakamura ◽  
Kazuya Fujita ◽  
Chiharu Fuchizawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Vein Occlusion

EFFICACY OF COMBINED INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS OF BEVACIZUMAB AND TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE IN PATIENTS WITH NON-RESOLVING MACULAR EDEMA SECONDARY TO BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

2021 ◽  
pp. 48-49
Author(s):  
Haniyaa Mufti ◽  
Syed Tariq Qureshi ◽  
Birjees Hakak
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Common Adverse Effect ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Vein Occlusion

Purpose: To study the effects of combined intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (IVB) and triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in patients with non-resolving macular edema (ME) secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO). Methods: In a prospective observational study, 50 pseudophakic eyes of BRVO patients with non-resolving central macular edema who had received more than 3 doses of IVB previously were injected with combination therapy of 1.25 mg/0.05 ml IVB and 4 mg of IVTA and followed up for 6 months with best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP) and central macular thickness(CMT) Results: The mean BCVA was logMAR 0.75±0.25 at baseline and 0.65±0.15, 0.48±0.20, and 0.22±0.25 at 6weeks, 3 months and 6 months respectively. Mean CMT at baseline was 668.32±254.66 and 434.43±99.55, 243.22±58.92, and 220.83±42.60 at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months respectively. Baseline IOP measured was 16.5±3.1 mmHg which progressed to 19.6±3.4mmHg and 21.4±2.8mmHg at 6 weeks and 3 months respectively and decreased to 17.3±2.2 at 6 months. The most common adverse effect seen was increase in IOP in 24(48%)patients, out of which 3(6%) patients needed to start anti-glaucoma medication (AGM). 3(6%) patients had sub-conjunctival hemorrhage(SCH). Conclusion: The prolonged therapeutic effects of combination therapy leads to outstanding anatomical and visual outcome in non resolving ME due to BRVO, with fewer doses and thus fewer adverse effects.

INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS OF ZIV-AFLIBERCEPT FOR THE TREATMENT OF A PATIENT WITH MACULAR EDEMA SECONDARY TO BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Costa de Andrade ◽  
João Rafael de Oliveira Dias ◽  
André Maia ◽  
Michel Eid Farah ◽  
Somaia Mitne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Vein Occlusion

Comparison of ranibizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser in treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 690-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelda Buyru Özkurt ◽  
Sezen Akkaya ◽  
Sibel Aksoy ◽  
Mert Hakan Şimşek
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: To compare the effects of intravitreal ranibizumab injection and yellow (577 nm) subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in patients with macular edema following non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion. Methods: The medical records of 51 patients who underwent intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 mg) injection or subthreshold micropulse laser for the treatment of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion were retrospectively reviewed. Subthreshold micropulse laser was administered with a 10% duty cycle, 100 μm spot diameter, 200 ms exposure time. The patients received an injection or laser treatment at baseline and were, then, retreated as needed and were followed for 12 months. The mean best corrected visual acuity changes over the follow-up and the decrease in the mean central macular thickness were evaluated. Results: A total of 27 and 24 patients were assigned to intravitreal ranibizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser subgroups, respectively. The mean number of treatment was 3.81 of intravitreal ranibizumab group and 1.5 of subthreshold micropulse laser group (p < 0.05). The subgroups were similar with regard to the mean score of best corrected visual acuity at baseline, at 1, 6, and 12 months (p > 0.05). The decrease in the mean central macular thickness was significant in both intravitreal ranibizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser groups at 1, 6, and 12 months than that of values at baseline (p < 0.05). No new ocular or systemic adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Our study results showed that intravitreal ranibizumab or yellow subthreshold micropulse laser treatment for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion was not found to be superior to each other for reducing macular thickness and increasing visual acuity for 1-year period. Based on these results, subthreshold micropulse laser may be a useful alternative approach in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Role of the Vitreous and Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

1997 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-299
Author(s):  
Masatoshi K Takihashi ◽  
Taiichi Hikichi ◽  
Jun Akiba ◽  
Akitoshi Yoshida ◽  
Clement L Trempe
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Vein Occlusion

scholarly journals Initial Dose of Three Monthly Intravitreal Injections versus PRN Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Joon Ahn ◽  
Jeeyun Ahn ◽  
Se Joon Woo ◽  
Kyu Hyung Park
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Initial Dose ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Initial Injection

Purpose. To compare visual and anatomic outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab injections administered as needed (PRN group) and initial treatment with 3 monthly injections followed by as-needed injections (3 monthly initial dose group) in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).Methods. This retrospective study included 69 and 26 patients in the PRN and 3 monthly initial dose groups, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were compared between the 2 groups 6 months after initial injection.Results. At month 6, BCVA change from baseline was-0.27±0.28(mean ± standard deviation) logMAR in the PRN group and-0.28±0.20 logMAR in the 3 monthly initial dose group. Mean CRT changes were-204±168in the PRN group and-161±149 μm in the 3 monthly initial dose group at month 6. There were no statistically significant differences in BCVA or CRT changes between groups at any time point. The number of intravitreal injections over 6 months was significantly lower in the PRN group (1.8±0.8injections) than in the 3 monthly initial dose group (3.4±0.5injections;P<0.001).Conclusions. Our results suggest that as-needed intravitreal bevacizumab injections are more tolerable for patients with ME secondary to BRVO.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document