Long‐term effectiveness of an online decision aid for female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation: Knowledge, attitude, and decisional regret

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena Ehrbar ◽  
Ariane Germeyer ◽  
Frank Nawroth ◽  
Astrid Dangel ◽  
Sebastian Findeklee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Female Cancer Patients ◽  
Decisional Regret

Fertility Preservation in Young Female Cancer Patients: Development and Pilot Testing of an Online Decision Aid

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena Ehrbar ◽  
Corinne Urech ◽  
Christoph Rochlitz ◽  
Rosanna Zanetti Dällenbach ◽  
Rebecca Moffat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Young Female ◽  
Pilot Testing ◽  
Female Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Development and testing of a tailored online fertility preservation decision aid for female cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Berg ◽  
Elleke Meij ◽  
Annelies M. E. Bos ◽  
Marieke C. S. Boshuizen ◽  
Domino Determann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Female Cancer Patients

A Real-Life Analysis of Reproductive Outcome after Fertility Preservation in Female Cancer Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie Hulsbosch ◽  
Martin Koskas ◽  
Carla Tomassetti ◽  
Petra De Sutter ◽  
Hans Wildiers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Reproductive Outcome ◽  
Female Cancer Patients ◽  
Life Analysis

scholarly journals Fertility preservation in female cancer patients: a single center experience

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Sigismondi ◽  
Enrico Papaleo ◽  
Paola Vigano ◽  
Simona Vailati ◽  
Massimo Candiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Female Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Addressing decisional conflict about fertility preservation: helping young female cancer survivors’ family planning decisions

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madleina Müller ◽  
Corinne Urech ◽  
Jacky Boivin ◽  
Verena Ehrbar ◽  
Rebecca Moffat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Planning ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Decisional Conflict ◽  
Young Female ◽  
University Education ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Female Cancer Patients

BackgroundHealth professionals are challenged by a growing number of young long-term cancer survivors with their specific needs with regard to family planning. This study aimed at assessing decisional conflict (DC) in young female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation, identifying demographic, fertility and fertility preservation related factors, which may affect DC, and assessing the helpfulness of various decision-supports.MethodsA retrospective, cross-sectional, web-based survey via an online questionnaire available in three languages with specific items concerning cancer, fertility, fertility preservation and the validated Decisional Conflict Scale targeted at current or former female cancer patients aged 18–45 years, with cancer types or treatment potentially affecting reproductive function.ResultsThe 155 participating women showed considerable DC, especially with regard to missing information and support. DC was significantly lower in patients when the risk of infertility was discussed with a health professional, when they had undergone any procedure to preserve fertility, and when they had a university education. A longer time interval since cancer diagnosis was associated with higher DC. The most helpful decision-support tools were specialised websites and leaflets.ConclusionsYoung female cancer patients’ DC with regard to fertility preservation is very high. Information and support seem to be deficient. More information through standardised information tools might be an effective strategy to lower their DC at the time when treatment decisions need to be taken, and to improve their reproductive health after they have overcome cancer in the future.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes in cancer patients who did or did not pursue fertility preservation

2018 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly B. Moravek ◽  
Rafael Confino ◽  
Kristin N. Smith ◽  
Ralph R. Kazer ◽  
Susan C. Klock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Long Term Outcomes

Young-onset colorectal cancer treatment side effects: Infertility, sexual dysfunction, and quality-of-life outcomes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3587-3587
Author(s):  
Laura Diane Porter ◽  
Ronit Yarden ◽  
Kim Lynn Newcomer ◽  
Negeen Fathi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Sexual Dysfunction ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Cancer Treatments ◽  
Young Onset

3587 Background: Colorectal cancer is the third-most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second-leading cause of cancer death in men and women combined in the United States. Young-onset colorectal cancer refers to individuals diagnosed under the age of 50. In recent years, the incidence has increased by 2.2% annually in individuals younger than 50 years and 1% in individuals 50-64, in contrast to a 3.3% decrease in adults 65 years and older. Young-onset (YO) CRC patients and survivors face unique clinical challenges with fertility and sexual dysfunctions, but this risk is not well quantified. There is limited data and public discussion on the long-term effects of colorectal cancer treatments on fertility and sexual dysfunction and the long-term impact on the quality of life. Methods: To explore the unique challenges and unmet needs of the young-adult patient population, a cross-sectional study was conducted. Colorectal cancer patients and survivors (N = 884) diagnosed between the ages of 20 to 50 years old (median age 42 ± 7.0) completed an online questionnaire based on established instruments EORTC-QOL-30, EORTC-CR-29, and EORTC-SHC-22. Results: Thirty-one percent of respondents stated that a medical professional spoke to them about fertility preservation at the time of diagnosis and during treatment. Only 31% were referred to a reproductive endocrinologist, even though 37% of women and 16% of men reported that treatment left them infertile or sterile. Among survey respondents, 12% of women had an egg retrieval procedure, and 36% of men had their sperm preserved prior to the start of treatment. Fifty-three percent of women reported treatment led to premature menopause. Sixty-five percent of respondents suffer from some level of sexual dysfunction due to treatment. In patients who received radiation therapy, women were 12% less likely than men to have discussed sexual side effects with the provider before treatment. Patients who have an ostomy reported more severe sexual dysfunction (17.8%). Rectal cancer patients were 2.5 times more likely than those with colon cancer to report severe dysfunction after their treatment. More than 25% of the respondents said they would have considered alternative treatment if they would have known the risks of sexual dysfunction. Conclusions: Our survey demonstrates inadequate communications between patients and providers about the irreversible fertility and sexual effects of colorectal cancer treatments. Younger patients and survivors face unique long-term challenges and require further information about fertility preservation options and emotional support regarding their sexuality post-treatment. Other studies are needed to assess the physical and psychological side effects endured by young-onset CRC patients and survivors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document