scholarly journals Clinical decision analysis and model‐based economic evaluation studies in perinatology: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (8) ◽  
pp. 967-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan D'Souza ◽  
Kyra Bonasia ◽  
Prakesh S. Shah ◽  
Kellie E. Murphy ◽  
Beate Sander
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Model Based

Systematic review of health economic evaluation studies of dengue vaccines

Vaccine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (17) ◽  
pp. 2298-2310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrícia Coelho de Soárez ◽  
Aline Blumer Silva ◽  
Bruno Azevedo Randi ◽  
Laura Marques Azevedo ◽  
Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Novaes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Economic ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Health Economic Evaluation

Systematic review and quality assessment of economic evaluation studies of injury prevention

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 211-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Polinder ◽  
Maria Segui-Gomez ◽  
Hidde Toet ◽  
Eefje Belt ◽  
Dinesh Sethi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Injury Prevention ◽  
Evaluation Studies

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Methods, Study Quality, and Results of Economic Evaluation for Childhood and Adolescent Obesity Intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandana Zanganeh ◽  
Peymane Adab ◽  
Bai Li ◽  
Emma Frew
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Adolescent Obesity ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Full Economic Evaluation ◽  
Childhood And Adolescent Obesity

Many suggested policy interventions for childhood and adolescent obesity have costs and effects that fall outside the health care sector. These cross-sectorial costs and consequences have implications for how economic evaluation is applied and although previous systematic reviews have provided a summary of cost-effectiveness, very few have conducted a review of methods applied. We undertook this comprehensive review of economic evaluations, appraising the methods used, assessing the quality of the economic evaluations, and summarising cost-effectiveness. Nine electronic databases were searched for full-economic evaluation studies published between January 2001 and April 2017 with no language or country restrictions. 39 economic evaluation studies were reviewed and quality assessed. Almost all the studies were from Western countries and methods were found to vary by country, setting and type of intervention. The majority, particularly “behavioural and policy” preventive interventions, were cost-effective, even cost-saving. Only four interventions were not cost effective. This systematic review suggests that economic evaluation of obesity interventions is an expanding area of research. However, methodological heterogeneity makes evidence synthesis challenging. Whilst upstream interventions show promise, an expanded and consistent approach to evaluate cost-effectiveness is needed to capture health and non-health costs and consequences.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Scope and Quality of Health Economic Evaluation Studies in Vietnam

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e103825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bach Xuan Tran ◽  
Vuong Minh Nong ◽  
Rachel Marie Maher ◽  
Phuong Khanh Nguyen ◽  
Hoat Ngoc Luu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Economic ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Health Economic Evaluation

scholarly journals A protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluation studies conducted on neonatal systemic infections in South Asia

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shruti Murthy ◽  
Denny John ◽  
Isadora Perpetual Godinho ◽  
Myron Anthony Godinho ◽  
Vasudeva Guddattu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
South Asia ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Systemic Infections

scholarly journals Neuropsychological rehabilitation interventions for people with an acquired brain injury and their caregivers. A protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Eileen Mitchell ◽  
Elayne Ahern ◽  
Sanjib Saha ◽  
Dominic Trepel
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Systematic Review Methodology

Background: New emerging evidence has demonstrated the need for effective interventions to help people living with an acquired brain injury (ABI). Evidence on cost-effectiveness, which can help inform use of limited resources, is scarce in this area and therefore the purpose of this systematic review is to critically appraise and consolidate the current evidence on economic evaluations of ABI rehabilitation interventions. Methods: Systematic review methodology will be applied to identify, select and extract data from published economic evaluation studies (trial-based, non-trial based, simulation-based, decision model and trial-based model economic evaluations) of ABI treatment interventions in adults. A systematic literature search will be conducted on the following electronic databases: EMBASE, Econlit, CINAHL, Medline, Econlit, the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database and PsyclNFO. This review will only include cost-effectiveness analysis studies (e.g., cost per life year gained), cost-benefit and cost minimisation analyses in which the designs were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCT studies, cost-utility analyses (e.g., cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained or cost per disability-adjusted life year averted), cohort studies, and modeling studies. Only studies that were published in English, associated with adults who have an ABI will be included. There will be no restrictions on perspective, sample size, country, follow-up duration or setting. The search strategy terms will include the following: acquired brain injury, brain*; cost*; or cost–benefit analysis*. Following data extraction, a narrative summary and tables will be used to summarize the characteristics and results of included studies. Discussion: The findings from this review will be beneficial to health policy decision makers when examining the evidence of economic evaluations in this field. In addition, it is anticipated that this review will identify gaps in the current economic literature to inform future-related research. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020187469 (25th June 2020).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document