Post‐oesophagectomy chyle leak presenting as a pleuro‐enteral lymphatic shunt via the gastric conduit

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaleb Lourensz ◽  
Damien Loh ◽  
Paul Burton
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 200-206

Oesophagectomy is being used in treatment of several oesophageal diseases, most commonly in treatment of oesophageal cancer. It is a major surgical procedure that may result in various complications. One of the most severe complications is anastomotic dehiscence between the gastric conduit and the oesophageal remnant. Anastomotic dehiscence after esophagectomy is directly linked to high morbidity and mortality. We propose a therapeutic algorithm of this complication based on published literature and our experience by retrospective evaluationof 164 patients who underwent oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. Anastomotic dehiscence was present in 29 cases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 226 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Noma ◽  
Yasuhiro Shirakawa ◽  
Nobuhiko Kanaya ◽  
Tsuyoshi Okada ◽  
Naoaki Maeda ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
JamesR Ramus ◽  
MichaelI Booth ◽  
Gareth Powell

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
John V Reynolds ◽  
Jessie A Elliott ◽  
Noel Donlon ◽  
Claire Donohoe ◽  
Narayanasamy Ravi ◽  
...  

Abstract   The ECCG developed a standardized platform for reporting operative complications, with consensus definitions, and DUCA adopted these definitions and have reported a comparison against these benchmarks. The aim of this study was to report five year complications data using the standardized definitions of the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and to compare with published ECCG benchmark studies from the collaborative group and from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA). Methods All patients undergoing multimodal therapy or surgery with curative intent from 2014 to 2018 inclusive were studied. All data were recorded prospectively and maintained internally as well as entered onto a secure online database (Esodata.org) from 2015. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS® (version 18.0). Results 219 patients (mean age 67; 77% male) underwent open resection, 66.6% via transthoracic en bloc resection. 30-day and 90-day mortality were 0.0 and 0.9%, respectively. The anastomotic leak rate was 5.4%, and chyle leak 5.4%. Pneumonia was recorded in 18.2%, respiratory failure 10.9%, and ARDS in 2.7%. Atrial dysrhythmia occurred in 22.8%, recurrent nerve injury 3.1%, and delirium in 5.0%. Compared with both ECCG and DUCA, where MIE constituted 47% and 86% of surgical approaches, respectively, overall complications were similar in this open series, as was complications severity, however anastomotic leak rate were several-fold less, and mortality rates were lower. Conclusion In this unselected consecutive series and comparative audit with benchmark averages from the ECCG and DUCA publication, a low mortality and anastomotic leak rate were the key differential findings. Although not risk-stratified or directly matched, the severity of complications from this ‘open’ series is consistent with series containing large numbers of total or hybrid MIE, highlighting a need to adhere to these strictly defined definitions in further prospective research and randomized studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Subramanyeshwar Rao Thammineedi

Abstract   Post esophagectomy anastomotic leakage and stricture are crucial factors in determining morbidity and mortality. Good vascularity of the gastric conduit is essential to avoid this complications. This prospective study assesses the utility of intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging to determine gastric conduit vascularity in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Methods Thirteen consecutive patients who were undergoing esophagectomy for carcinoma middle, lower third esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction from August 2019 to September 2019, were included. Three patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy, ten thoraco-laparoscopic assisted esophagectomy. Reconstruction was done by gastric pull up via posterior mediastinal route. Vascularity of gastric conduit was assessed by the near-infrared camera using ICG. Results On visual assessment of perfusion at the tip of gastric conduit, it was dusky in 11 patients, pink in two. Fuorescence imaging showed inadequate perfusion at the tip of conduit in 12 patients, needing revision. In one patient visual inspection showed adequate perfusion, but ICG disclosed poor vascularity requiring revision of the conduit’s tip. Resection of the devitalized portion of the proximal esophageal stump was needed in 5 patients both by visual and ICG assessment. The median time to appearance of blush from the time of injection of dye was 15 seconds (10 to 23 seconds). Conclusion Visual inspection of the gastric conduit vascularity can underestimate perfusion and hence can compromise resection of the devitalized part. ICG fluorescence imaging is more objective and promising means to ascertain the vascularity of gastric conduit during an esophagectomy. It could complement the visual inspection to decide the site of anastomosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document