How to do an immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction with the TiLoop bra pocket

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 360-361
Author(s):  
Ian E‐Ern Ng ◽  
Elisabeth Elder ◽  
James French
Keyword(s):  
Implant Reconstruction ◽  
Tiloop Bra

Immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction using TiLOOP Bra Pocket results in improved patient satisfaction over dual plane reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-707
Author(s):  
E‐Ern Ian Ng ◽  
Gaik Si Quah ◽  
Susannah Graham ◽  
Kavitha Kanesalingam ◽  
Farid Meybodi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Dual Plane ◽  
Implant Reconstruction ◽  
Tiloop Bra

Implant Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation Therapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Ascherman ◽  
Matthew M. Hanasono ◽  
Martin I. Newman ◽  
Duncan B. Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Implant Reconstruction

TRANSCAPSULAR ACCESS FOR THE EXCISION OF PRIMARY OR RECURRENT BREAST TUMORS IN WOMEN WITH IMPLANT RECONSTRUCTION

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benigno Acea-Nebril ◽  
Alejandro Fernández Quinto ◽  
Alejandra García-Novoa ◽  
Carlota Diaz Carballada ◽  
Lourdes García Jiménez
Keyword(s):  
Breast Tumors ◽  
Recurrent Breast ◽  
Implant Reconstruction

Immediate nipple reconstruction in combination with implant reconstruction using dermal sling

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 723-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Filobbos ◽  
Nathan Hamnett ◽  
Joseph Hardwicke ◽  
Joanna Skillman
Keyword(s):  
Nipple Reconstruction ◽  
Implant Reconstruction ◽  
Dermal Sling

Titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLoop Bra®)—an effective prevention for capsular contracture?

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 339-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp A. Bergmann ◽  
Benedikt Becker ◽  
Karl L. Mauss ◽  
Maria E. Liodaki ◽  
Johannes Knobloch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polypropylene Mesh ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
Tiloop Bra

scholarly journals Novel Pre-Mastectomy Permanent Implant Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Tissue Expander ◽  
Silicone Implants ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Dermal Substitute ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Permanent Implant ◽  
Implant Reconstruction

Background: Breast reconstruction has been shown to have significant psychosocial benefits for breast cancer patients. Multiple techniques have been used to improve patient satisfaction, aesthetic outcomes, and decrease complications. However, while these techniques are advantageous, they have some significant disadvantages. We are presenting a novel two-stage, pre-mastectomy permanent implant reconstruction (PPIR) technique in an attempt to overcome some of these disadvantages. Methods: Five patients met the essential criteria: they underwent PPIR by insertion of silicone implants three weeks before a proposed mastectomy. The Short Form-36 quality of life questionnaire and the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Survey were used before and after the surgery to assess outcome and patient satisfaction. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare changes in the survey scores for various psychosocial subscales and to determine whether score changes after reconstruction were significant. Result: Five patients underwent seven breast reconstructions using PPIR. None of the patients experienced surgical complications (e.g. mastectomy flap complication, wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, or implant-related complications). The PPIR technique resulted in improved psychosocial outcomes and body image with high patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Pre-mastectomy permanent implant reconstruction is a promising potential technique with good aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction that carries no tissue expander complications and eliminates multiple clinic visits and the usage of a dermal substitute.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document