Functional outcome of low rectal resection evaluated by anorectal manometry

2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. E512-E516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Ihnát ◽  
Petr Vávra ◽  
Jiří Prokop ◽  
Anton Pelikán ◽  
Lucia Ihnát Rudinská ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Anorectal Manometry ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Resection

scholarly journals Laparoscopic versus Robotic-assisted Rectal Surgery: A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 1059-1063
Author(s):  
Monica T. Young ◽  
Gopal Menon ◽  
Timothy F. Feldmann ◽  
Steven Mills ◽  
Joseph Carmichael ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
American Society ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted ◽  
Low Rectal Resection ◽  
Robotic Rectal Resection ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Invasive Techniques

Rectal surgery continues to be an area of advancement for minimally invasive techniques. However, there is controversy regarding whether a robotic approach imparts any advantages over established laparoscopic procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic rectal resection operations. A single-institution retrospective review was performed identifying 83 consecutive patients undergoing low rectal resection requiring proximal diversion between 2009 and 2013. The cohort was comprised of 38 laparoscopic and 45 robotic cases. Data were analyzed for postoperative outcomes as well as 30-day morbidity and mortality. Male gender frequency, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class were higher in the robotic group (71%, 28.6 kg/m2, and 2.6, respectively) compared with the laparoscopic group (42%, 23.7 kg/m2, and 2.2, respectively; P < 0.01). Length of stay was significantly longer for patients undergoing laparoscopic (7.5 days) compared with robotic procedures (5.7 days, P < 0.01). This difference was even greater when comparing patients who underwent a hybrid laparoscopic-assisted open total mesorectal excision (TME) with robotic TME (8.2 vs 5.7 days, respectively, P < 0.01). Conversion rate was 7.9 per cent for the laparoscopic group and zero per cent for the robotic ( P = 0.09). There were no mortalities in either group. A pure laparoscopic or robotic rectal surgery may be associated with a shorter hospital stay compared with a laparoscopic-assisted approach.

Does a Defunctioning Stoma Affect Anorectal Function After Low Rectal Resection? Results of a Randomized Multicenter Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 747-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rickard Lindgren ◽  
Olof Hallböök ◽  
Jörgen Rutegård ◽  
Rune Sjödahl ◽  
Peter Matthiessen
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Anorectal Function ◽  
Defunctioning Stoma ◽  
Low Rectal Resection

Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer

1995 ◽  
Vol 169 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekkehard C. Jehle ◽  
Torsten Haehnel ◽  
Michael J. Starlinger ◽  
Horst D. Becker
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Anterior Rectal Resection ◽  
Influence Functional

Stapled transanal rectal resection for symptomatic intussusception: morphological and functional outcome

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1969-1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinhold A. Lang ◽  
Sonja Buhmann ◽  
Christine Lautenschlager ◽  
Mario H. Müller ◽  
Andreas Lienemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document