Cardiac output monitoring with thermodilution pulse‐contour analysis vs. non‐invasive pulse‐contour analysis

Anaesthesia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 735-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Boisson ◽  
M. E. Poignard ◽  
B. Pontier ◽  
O. Mimoz ◽  
B. Debaene ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Pulse Contour Analysis ◽  
Pulse Contour ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Contour Analysis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Output Monitoring

Pulse Contour Analysis Cardiac Output Monitoring in Congenital Heart Surgery

2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (Sup 2) ◽  
pp. A488
Author(s):  
Aman Mahajan ◽  
Afshin Shabanie ◽  
Judi Turner ◽  
Jure Marijic ◽  
Michael Sopher
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Pulse Contour Analysis ◽  
Pulse Contour ◽  
Congenital Heart Surgery ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Contour Analysis ◽  
Output Monitoring

Cardiac output monitoring in paediatric cardiac surgery: a review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hannah M. Woodman ◽  
Corlyn Lee ◽  
Ayesha N. Ahmed ◽  
Bassit A. Malik ◽  
Sophie Mellor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Transoesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Pulse Contour Analysis ◽  
Pulse Contour ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Contour Analysis ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Output Monitoring ◽  
Effectiveness Assessment

Abstract The aim of this review is to present the current options for cardiac output (CO) monitoring in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Current technologies for monitoring identified were a range of invasive, minimally invasive, and non-invasive technologies. These include pulmonary artery catheter, transoesophageal echocardiography, pulse contour analysis, electrical cardiography, and thoracic bioreactance. A literature search was conducted using evidence databases which identified two current guidelines; the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde guideline and Royal College of Anaesthetics Guideline. These were appraised using the AGREE II tool and the evidence identified was used to create an overview summary of each technological option for CO monitoring. There is limited evidence regarding the accuracy of modalities available for CO monitoring in paediatric patients during cardiac surgery. Each technology has advantages and disadvantages; however, none could be championed as the most beneficial. Furthermore, a gold standard for CO monitoring has not yet been identified for paediatric populations, nor is it apparent whether one modality is preferable based on the available evidence. Additional evidence using a standardised method for comparing CO measurements should be conducted in order to determine the best option for CO monitoring in paediatrics. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness assessment of each modality should be conducted. Only then will it be possible for clear, evidence-based guidance to be written.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document