Cranial nerve injuries with supraglottic airway devices: a systematic review of published case reports and series

Anaesthesia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Thiruvenkatarajan ◽  
R. M. Van Wijk ◽  
A. Rajbhoj
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cranial Nerve ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Nerve Injuries ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Devices ◽  
Cranial Nerve Injuries ◽  
Airway Devices

scholarly journals Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0216673
Author(s):  
Min-Soo Kim ◽  
Jin Ha Park ◽  
Ki-Young Lee ◽  
Seung Ho Choi ◽  
Hwan Ho Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Neck Position ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Devices ◽  
Airway Devices ◽  
Head And Neck Position

Cranial nerve injuries in Le Fort I osteotomy: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 601-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. dos Santos Alves ◽  
B.W. de Freitas Alves ◽  
A.C. de Figueiredo Costa ◽  
B.G.D.S. Carneiro ◽  
L.M. de Sousa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cranial Nerve ◽  
Nerve Injuries ◽  
Le Fort I Osteotomy ◽  
Le Fort ◽  
Cranial Nerve Injuries ◽  
Le Fort I

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy of the Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway during General Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Jin Ahn ◽  
Geun Joo Choi ◽  
Hyun Kang ◽  
Chong Wha Baek ◽  
Yong Hun Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Devices ◽  
Airway Devices

Air-Q® (air-Q) is a supraglottic airway device which can be used as a guidance of intubation in pediatric as well as in adult patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of air-Q compared to other airway devices during general anesthesia in pediatric patients by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 10 studies including 789 patients were included in the final analysis. Compared with other supraglottic airway devices, air-Q showed no evidence for a difference in leakage pressure and insertion time. The ease of insertion was significantly lower than other supraglottic airway devices. The success rate of intubation was significantly lower than other airway devices. However, fiberoptic view was better through the air-Q than other supraglottic airway devices. Therefore, air-Q could be a safe substitute for other airway devices and may provide better fiberoptic bronchoscopic view.

scholarly journals Comparison of the efficacy of supraglottic airway devices in low-risk adult patients: a network meta-analysis and systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Jun Lai ◽  
Yi-Chun Yeh ◽  
Yu-Kang Tu ◽  
Ya-Jung Cheng ◽  
Chih-Min Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Laryngeal Tube ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Devices ◽  
Tube Suction ◽  
Airway Devices

AbstractNumerous supraglottic airway device (SADs) have been designed for adults; however, their relative efficacy, indicated by parameters such as adequacy of sealing, ease of application, and postinsertion complications, remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of various SADs. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials comparing at least two types of SADs published before December 2019. The primary outcomes were oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), risk of first-attempt insertion failure, and postoperative sore throat rate (POST). We included 108 studies (n = 10,645) comparing 17 types of SAD. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway (LMA), the I-gel supraglottic airway, the Supreme LMA, the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway, the SoftSeal, the Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway, the Air-Q, the Laryngeal Tube, the Laryngeal Tube Suction II, the Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable, AuraGain, and Protector had significantly higher OLP (mean difference ranging from 3.98 to 9.18 cmH2O) compared with that of a classic LMA (C-LMA). The Protector exhibited the highest OLP and was ranked first. All SADs had a similar likelihood of first-attempt insertion failure and POST compared with the C-LMA. Our findings indicate that the Protector may be the best SAD because it has the highest OLP.Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42017065273.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document