scholarly journals A decline in planned, but not spontaneous, preterm birth rates in a large Australian tertiary maternity centre during COVID‐19 mitigation measures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda A. Gallo ◽  
Tania F. Gallo ◽  
Danielle J. Borg ◽  
Karen M. Moritz ◽  
Vicki L. Clifton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Mitigation Measures ◽  
Spontaneous Preterm Birth ◽  
Birth Rates

Changes in incidence of iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm births over time: a population-based study

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miha Lucovnik ◽  
Andreja Trojner Bregar ◽  
Lili Steblovnik ◽  
Ivan Verdenik ◽  
Ksenija Gersak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Preterm Births ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Spontaneous Preterm Birth ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Preterm Birth Rate ◽  
Iatrogenic Preterm Delivery ◽  
Over Time

AbstractTo examine the proportion of iatrogenic births among all preterm births over a 26-year period.A registry-based survey of preterm deliveries between 1987 and 2012 analyzed by the onset of labor: spontaneous with intact membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) or iatrogenic. Stratification into categories by gestation (22 weeks to 27 weeks and 6 days, 28 weeks to 31 weeks and 6 days, 32 weeks to 33 weeks and 6 days, 34 weeks to 36 weeks and 6 days) was performed. Preterm birth rates were analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel linear-by-linear associationOverall preterm birth rate was 5.9% (31328 deliveries) including 2358 (0.4%) before 28 completed weeks, 3388 (0.6%) between 28 weeks and 31 weeks 6 days, 3970 (0.8%) between 32 weeks and 33 weeks and 6 days, and 21611 (4.1%) between 34 weeks and 36 weeks and 6 days There was an increase in overall preterm birth rate (P<0.001). The rate of iatrogenic preterm births and PPROM increased over time (P<0.001 and P<0.014, respectively). Rates of spontaneous preterm birth decreased (P<0.001). After accounting for potential confounders, year of birth remained an independent risk factor for iatrogenic preterm delivery in all four gestational age categories (P<0.001).The incidence of iatrogenic preterm birth is increasing with a concomitant decrease in the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth. Attempts to analyze, interpret and decrease preterm birth rates should consider spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm births separately.

scholarly journals Preterm birth rates in a large tertiary Australian maternity centre during COVID-19 mitigation measures

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda A. Gallo ◽  
Tania F. Gallo ◽  
Danielle J. Borg ◽  
Karen M. Moritz ◽  
Vicki L. Clifton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Preterm Births ◽  
Late Preterm ◽  
Mitigation Measures ◽  
Hypertensive Disorder ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Very Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Preterm ◽  
Multiple Covariates

AbstractObjectivesTo compare the prevalence of live preterm birth rates during COVID-19 restriction measures with infants born during the same weeks in 2013-2019 in Queensland, Australia.Design, setting, participantsDeidentified obstetric and neonatal data were extracted from the Mater Mothers’ electronic healthcare records database. This is a supra-regional tertiary perinatal centre.Main outcome measuresLogistic regressions were used to examine preterm birth rates during the beginning of COVID-19 restrictions (16 March-17 April; “early”; 6,955 births) and during the strictest part of COVID-19 restrictions (30 March-1 May; “late”; 6,953 births), according to gestational age subgroups and birth onset (planned or spontaneous). We adjusted for multiple covariates, including maternal age, body mass index, ethnicity, parity, socioeconomic status, maternal asthma, diabetes mellitus and/or hypertensive disorder. Stillbirth rates were also examined (16 March-1 May).ResultsA reduction in planned moderate/late preterm births was observed primarily during the early restriction period compared with the same calendar weeks in the previous seven years (29 versus an average of 64 per 1,000 births; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.71). There was no effect on extremely or very preterm infants, spontaneous preterm births, or stillbirth rates. Rolling averages from January to June revealed a two-week non-significant spike in spontaneous preterm births from late-April to early-May, 2020.ConclusionsPlanned births for moderate/late preterm infants more than halved during early COVID-19 mitigation measures. Together with evidence from other nations, the COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to identify causal and preventative factors for preterm birth.

scholarly journals 649: Spontaneous preterm birth rates among unselected women in their first and second pregnancy

2016 ◽  
Vol 214 (1) ◽  
pp. S345
Author(s):  
Bouchra Koullali ◽  
Esme I. Kamphuis ◽  
Christianne J.M. de Groot ◽  
Eva Pajkrt ◽  
Michel H.P. Hof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Spontaneous Preterm Birth ◽  
Birth Rates

Large social disparities in spontaneous preterm birth rates in transitional Russia

Public Health ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Grjibovski ◽  
L.O. Bygren ◽  
A. Yngve ◽  
M. Sjöström
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Social Disparities ◽  
Spontaneous Preterm Birth ◽  
Birth Rates

scholarly journals Spontaneous Preterm Birth: Is Prevention with Aspirin Possible?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Berger ◽  
Ioannis Kyvernitakis ◽  
Holger Maul
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Preterm Births ◽  
Spontaneous Preterm Birth ◽  
Dose Aspirin ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Low Dose Aspirin ◽  
Secondary Analyses ◽  
Double Blinded

Abstract Background The rate of preterm births in Germany is 8.6%, which is very high compared to other European countries. As preterm birth contributes significantly to perinatal morbidity and mortality rates, the existing prevention strategies need to be optimized and expanded further. About ⅔ of all women with preterm birth have preterm labor or premature rupture of membranes. They are bracketed together under the term “spontaneous preterm birth” as opposed to iatrogenic preterm birth, for example as a consequence of preeclampsia or fetal growth retardation. Recent studies suggest that low-dose aspirin does not just reduce the rate of iatrogenic preterm births but can also further reduce the rate of spontaneous preterm births. This review article presents the current state of knowledge. Method A selective literature search up until April 2020 was done in PubMed, using the terms “randomized trial”, “randomized study”, “spontaneous preterm birth”, and “aspirin”. Results Secondary analyses of prospective randomized studies on the prevention of preeclampsia with low-dose aspirin show that this intervention also significantly reduced the rate of spontaneous preterm births in both high-risk and low-risk patient populations. The results of the ASPIRIN trial, a prospective, randomized, double-blinded multicenter study carried out in six developing countries, also point in this direction, with the figures showing that the daily administration of 81 mg aspirin starting before 14 weeks of gestation lowered the preterm birth rate of nulliparous women without prior medical conditions by around 11% (11.6 vs. 13.1%; RR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81 – 0.98, p = 0.012). Conclusion Further studies on this issue are urgently needed. If these confirm the currently available results, then it would be worth discussing whether general aspirin prophylaxis for all pregnant women starting at the latest in 12 weeks of gestation is indicated.

scholarly journals Magnitude of spontaneous preterm birth and its associated factors among preterm birth in NICU wards in Asella Teaching and Referral Hospital, Asella, Oromia, Ethiopia

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052110346
Author(s):  
Techane Sisay Tuji ◽  
Addisu Dabi Wake ◽  
Gezahegn Badeg Adere ◽  
Aselefu Beka Wedajo ◽  
Batu Dekeba Obole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Preterm Births ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Spontaneous Preterm Birth ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Bivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

Objective To assess the prevalence of spontaneous preterm births and to identify the associated risk factors. Methods This single-centre cross-sectional study enrolled women that experienced a preterm birth as registered on the neonatal log-book between 30 December 2019 and 30 December 2020. A pre-tested structured checklist was used to collect data (sociodemographic characteristics; obstetric-related factors; medical history; and pregnancy-related factors). Bivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to identify factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth. A multivariate model identified significant independent risk factors. Results A total of 310 patients participated in the study. The prevalence of spontaneous preterm birth in this population was 67.1% (208 of 310; 95% confidence interval [CI] 61.5, 71.9). Patients without a partner (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.470, 95% CI 1.23, 4.42), patients residing in a rural area (AOR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.123, 5.513) and those with a history of PIH during their current pregnancy (AOR = 0.104, 95% CI 0.053, 0.014) were significantly more likely to have a spontaneous preterm birth. Conclusion The prevalence of spontaneous preterm birth in in this study was high. Healthcare providers and all stakeholders should focus on screening pregnant women at the risk of spontaneous preterm birth.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document