Utility of fetal MRI for workup of fetal central nervous system anomalies in an Australian maternal-fetal medicine cohort

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Irwin ◽  
Amanda Henry ◽  
Saranya Gopikrishna ◽  
Jeanette Taylor ◽  
Alec W. Welsh
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luz Ángela Gutiérrez-Sánchez ◽  
Carlos Hernán Becerra-Mojica ◽  
Mario Augusto Rojas ◽  
Luis Alfonso Díaz-Martínez ◽  
Luis Alfonso Pérez-Vera ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 104-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burkhard S. Kasper ◽  
Arnd Dörfler ◽  
Nataliya Di Donato ◽  
Ekkehard M. Kasper ◽  
Dagmar Wieczorek ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inês Pimentel ◽  
João Costa ◽  
Óscar Tavares

Abstract Background Malformations of the central nervous system (CNS) constitute the 2nd most common group of fetal pathologies, which can be reflected throughout the patient's life. Fetal ultrasound (US), together with fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are extremely important techniques for the diagnosis of CNS malformations. The objective of this work was to address fetal US and fetal MRI, as well as the benefits of its use in different CNS pathologies and to ascertain which of the techniques presents better results. Methods For this systematic literature review, a search was conducted using databases such as PubMed® and ScienceDirect®, Google Scholar, b-on digital library, in a 10-year period, 2010 to 2020. 60 references were used, which met the inclusion criteria, namely compliance with the defined timeframe and the theme of the work to be addressed. Results As for the results, fetal US is the first-line technique for fetal evaluation, and its objective is to detect possible fetal malformations early, while fetal MRI complements the information collected through fetal US. When there are cases of isolated ventriculomegaly and complete agenesis of the corpus callosum, fetal US can correctly assess the pathology. When it comes to pathologies such as dysgenesis of the corpus callosum and malformations of the posterior fossa, fetal MRI evaluates more effectively in comparison to fetal US. Conclusions In conclusions, to reduce the number of false positives, the techniques should be used together, thus providing a better diagnosis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parag Suresh Mahajan ◽  
Nawal M. Al Moosawi ◽  
Islam Ali Hasan

Lipomas constitute less than 5% of primary brain tumors. Pericallosal lipomas (PCLp) constitute almost half of all intracranial lipomas. Corpus callosal anomalies commonly occur in cases with PCLps. Although PCLp is often described as corpus callosal lipoma, it is most often pericallosal in location. PCLps may have calcification in the periphery and may continue into lateral ventricles, which is a very rare presentation. We observed a case of PCLp with peripheral calcifications associated with PCLp continuing as bilaterally symmetrical lateral ventricular choroid plexus lipomas (CPLp) without any corpus callosal or other central nervous system anomalies, and as this is not been previously reported, we are presenting it. The appearance of PCLp in this case does not correspond to the descriptions of any of the existing morphological types (anterior and posterior) of classification of PCLps; it is rather mixed, where PCLp occupies both anterior and posterior locations around the corpus callosum.


1990 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-127
Author(s):  
ROY A. FILLY ◽  
JlMMY D. CARDOZA ◽  
RUTH B. GOLDSTEIN ◽  
ANTHONY J. BARKOVICH

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document