Apatinib in gastric carcinoma: A case report of partial response for first-line treatment in advanced disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e528-e530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaping Wang ◽  
Minghong Bi ◽  
Haoran Zhang ◽  
Zhenyuan Gao ◽  
Hairong Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Refractory eosinophilic fasciitis successfully treated with infliximab: A case report

2021 ◽  
pp. 239719832110043
Author(s):  
Paulina Śmigielska ◽  
Justyna Czarny ◽  
Jacek Kowalski ◽  
Aleksandra Wilkowska ◽  
Roman J. Nowicki
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Immunosuppressive Drugs ◽  
Unknown Etiology ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Eosinophilic Fasciitis ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Eosinophilic fasciitis is a rare connective tissue disease of unknown etiology. Therapeutic options include high-dose corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive drugs. We present a typical eosinophilic fasciitis case, which did not respond to first-line treatment, but improved remarkably after infliximab administration. This report demonstrates that in case of initial treatment failure, infliximab might be a relatively safe and effective way of eosinophilic fasciitis management.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Oesophago-Gastric Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Anica Högner ◽  
Peter Thuss-Patience
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Usa ◽  
First Line Treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors enrich the therapeutic landscape in oesophago-gastric carcinoma. With regard to oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the selective PD-1 (programmed cell death receptor 1)-inhibitor nivolumab improves disease-free survival in the adjuvant therapy setting (CHECKMATE-577). In first-line treatment, ESCC patients (pts) benefit in overall survival (OS) from the PD-1-inhibitor pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-590). In the second-line setting, nivolumab (ATTRACTION-03) and pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-181) demonstrate a benefit in OS compared with chemotherapy. These data resulted in the approval of nivolumab for the second-line treatment of advanced ESCC pts regardless of PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand 1) status in Europe, Asia, and the USA, and pembrolizumab for pts with PD-L1 CPS (combined positivity score) ≥ 10 in Asia and the USA. Further approvals can be expected. In gastro-oesophageal junction and gastric cancer, the addition of nivolumab to chemotherapy in first-line treatment improves OS in pts with advanced disease with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 (CHECKMATE-649). Additionally, pembrolizumab was non-inferior to chemotherapy for OS in PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 pts (KEYNOTE-062). In third-line treatment, nivolumab shows benefits in OS regardless of PD-L1 expression (ATTRACTION-02) with approval in Asia, and pembrolizumab prolonged the duration of response in PD-L1 positive pts (KEYNOTE-059) with approval in the USA. We discuss the recent results of the completed phase II and III clinical trials.

Major response to temozolomide as first-line treatment for newly-diagnosed DDR2-mutated glioblastoma: A case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 176 (5) ◽  
pp. 402-404
Author(s):  
K. El Husseini ◽  
F. Marguet ◽  
A. Lamy ◽  
N. Magne ◽  
M. Fontanilles
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Major Response ◽  
First Line Treatment

California rocket fuel: And what about being a first line treatment?

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S551-S551
Author(s):  
J. Silva ◽  
J. Mota ◽  
P. Azevedo
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Depressed Woman ◽  
Rocket Fuel ◽  
Resistant Depression ◽  
First Line Treatment

IntroductionThe association venlafaxine-mirtazapine is currently known as California Rocket Fuel (CRF). Studies show advantage in terms of efficacy and rapid control of depressive symptoms compared to other associations. Venlafaxine is a selective serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor and mirtazapine is a noradrenergic-specific serotonergic antidepressant: the result is a potent noradrenergic and serotonergic effect. Studies say that CRF should be performed only for drug-resistant depression; however, there are case reports of its use as a first line treatment, in selected patients.ObjectivesTo summarize the latest literature about this field and to present a case report.AimTo explore and critically review the controversies of venlafaxine-mirtazapine association as a first line antidepressants strategy.MethodsA brief review of the latest literature was performed, using PubMed and the keywords “venlafaxine-mirtazapine association”. A case report about a depressed woman is presented.ResultsDespite most studies are referent to its utility in drug-resistant depression, there are recent pilot studies that recommend CRF as a first line option.M., a 64-year-old woman, had her first psychiatric consultation. She had been depressed for 2 years, she lost 10 kg, had total insomnia and suicidal thoughts. CRF was started up to 150/15 mg, daily. An improvement was noticed after two weeks of treatment and the stabilization of depressive symptoms were achieved by the fourth month.ConclusionsCRF seems to be effective and useful. Patients with insomnia and weight loss may benefit from CRF as a first line option. However, more studies are needed.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

scholarly journals Survival Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients in Czech Republic

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4894-4894
Author(s):  
Tereza Popkova ◽  
Ludek Pour ◽  
Ivan Spicka ◽  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Alexandra Jungova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Czech Republic ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: Although highly effective agents and novel therapeutic strategies are being developed, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) has not been overcome in the first-line treatment for fit patients (pts) with multiple myeloma. The objective of this work is to retrospectively analyze the use of this procedure in newly diagnosed Czech patients. Methods: Data were derived using the Czech Myeloma Group Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies. By February 2 nd 2021, a total of 2154 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who underwent HDT/ASCT were identified. Results: At the time of multiple myeloma diagnosis, the median age was 59 years; 24%/56%/14%/5%/1% pts were ECOG 0/1/2/3/4; 44%/32%/24% pts were ISS stage I/II/III; 14.5%/17.5%/68% and 84%/16% pts were Durie-Salmon stage I/II/III and subclassification A/B, respectively. The combinations of agents used in the induction regimen were proteasome inhibitor (PI), immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and glucocorticoid (GC) in 28.5% (613/2154) pts; PI, GC and chemotherapy (CHT) in 24.8% (534/2154) pts; GC and CHT in 22,5% and IMiD, GC and CHT in 16.1% (346/2154). Other combination of drugs was used in 8.2% (177/2154) pts. It was registered that 3.7% (79/2154) induction regimens were switched to a different combination because of toxicity, patient's choice, poor peripheral venous access or other reasons. Single HDT/ASCT was performed in 77.3% (1665/2154) cases whereas tandem HDT/ASCT was given to 11.8% (254/2154) patients. In 10% (215/2154) cases, the transplantation technique was not specified. Nine percent (193/2154) patients were treated within a clinical study. The median progression free survival (mPFS) and the median overall survival (mOS) of the whole cohort was 28.9 and 92.1 months, respectively. Information about response to treatment before and after the high-dose therapy were available for 75.7% (1627/2154) and 92.2% (1987/2154) patients, respectively. Disease status at the time of HDT/ASCT was defined as stringent complete response (sCR) at 2.2% (36/1627), complete response (CR) at 11.9% (194/1627), very good partial response (VGPR) at 38.2% (621/1627), partial response (PR) at 40.9% (666/1627), minimal response (MR) at 3.6%, (58/1627), stable disease (SD) at 2.2% (36/1627), progressive disease (PD) at 1% (16/1627) patients. The overall response rate (ORR) on day 100 was 92.8% (sCR: 10.5% [209/1987], CR: 22.4% [446/1987], VGPR: 35% [696/1987], PR: 24.8% [493/1987], MR: 2.7% [54/1987], SD: 1.4% [27/1987], PD: 3.1% [62/1987]). We also performed a survival analysis of patients progressing up to 18 months after HDT/ASCT (n=1219) versus patients progressing in more than 18 months (n=935). The median OS was 41.5 versus 124.9 months, respectively. An analysis of the role of tandem HDT/ASCT in this real-world cohort will be presented at the conference. Conclusion: Globally as well as in the Czech Republic, HDT/ASCT is an important therapeutic approach in the first-line treatment of multiple myeloma. Our analysis of 2154 newly diagnosed transplant-eligible patients confirms high effectiveness - ORR of 92.8%, mPFS of 28.9 months, and long-term survival reaching mOS of 92.1 months. Disclosures Minarik: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Clinical experience with oral vinorelbine (NVB) plus prednisone as first- or second-line chemotherapy of metastatic hormone- refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16151-e16151
Author(s):  
J. M. Cervera ◽  
I. Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
R. Girones ◽  
M. Beltran ◽  
V. Calderero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

e16151 Background: IV NVB plus hydrocortisone (HC) compared with HC alone resulted in improved clinical benefit, progression-free survival (PFS) and PSA response rate in HRPC. The oral formulation of NVB avoids the side effects associated with the IV injection, may reduce administration and toxicity-related costs and is easy to administer. Due to these advantages, single agent oral NVB treatment could be considered as an optimal option for patients (p) with HRPC previously treated with a taxane or as first-line treatment when a taxane is not indicated. We retrospectively evaluated efficacy and toxicity or oral NVB administered as single agent as first or second-line chemotherapy of metastatic HRPC. Methods: Retrospectively data was collected from p with metastatic HRPC treated with oral NVB 80 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, with a prior test of myelosensitivity at 60 mg/m2 for the first cycle, plus prednisone 10 mg/day. Patients had received a taxane as first-line treatment or had a documented contraindication to receiving docetaxel. 1 cycle was equivalent to a 3-week period. Results: Data on 55 p treated in 11 Spanish centres were included for assessment. Median age was 72.5 years (range 54–86). ECOG PS 0, 17%; 1, 66%; 2, 17%. Median PSA 75 ng/mL. Prior taxane chemotherapy, 87%. Median number of cycles was 4 (range 1–6). 53.8% of p could escalate oral NVB to 80 mg/m2. 221 cycles were performed, 4.1% were delayed and 3.2% had a dose reduction. Grade 3–4 events were infrequent and mainly haematological: neutropenia (5.5% of p), anemia (3.6%), pain (3.6%), infection (1.8%), asthenia (1.8%), respiratory (1.8%). No febrile neutropenia was reported. 49 p were evaluable for PSA response rate; complete plus partial response was observed in 20.4% (95% CI: 10.2% - 34.3%) and PSA stable was reported in 40.8%. 29 p were evaluable for measurable disease; among them, 20.7% presented partial response and 44.8% stable disease. Median follow-up was 4.3 months. Survival status: 49 p (89.1%) are alive and 6 p (10.9%) died. Conclusions: Oral NVB is a safe and active regimen in previous chemotherapy treated HRPC. For those p who can not receive a taxane as first-line therapy, oral NVB can also be considered as an effective first-line treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Amrubicin monotherapy for patients with platinum-refractory gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 328-328
Author(s):  
Takayuki Ando ◽  
Ayumu Hosokawa ◽  
Hiroki Yoshita ◽  
Akira Ueda ◽  
Shinya Kajiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Refractory ◽  
First Line Treatment

328 Background: Patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) have a poor prognosis. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is commonly used as first-line treatment; however, because studies on salvage chemotherapy are limited, its role remains unknown. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of amrubicin monotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory gastroenteropancreatic NEC. Methods: Among 22 patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic NEC, 10 received amrubicin monotherapy between September 2006 and May 2014 after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. The efficacy and toxicity of the treatment were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Eight males and two females ((median age, 67 years (range, 52–78)) received platinum-based chemotherapy, including cisplatin plus irinotecan (n = 7, 70%), cisplatin plus etoposide (n = 2, 20%), and carboplatin plus etoposide (n = 1, 10%) before amrubicin therapy. A total of 30 cycles of amrubicin was administered in 10 patients, with a median number of cycles per patients was 2.5 (range, 1-7). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival after amrubicin therapy were 2.6 and 5.0 months, respectively. Two patients had partial response (20% response rate), and their PFS were 6.2 months and 6.3 months, respectively. Two patients with partial response had characteristics of NEC with a high Ki-67 index (99% and 89%, respectively) and had received cisplatin and irinotecan as first-line treatment. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and anemia were observed in four (40%) and five (50%) patients, and they were manageable in all cases by careful monitoring of myelosuppression and appropriate dose reduction of amrubicin. Conclusions: Amrubicin monotherapy appears to be potentially active and well-tolerated for platinum-refractory gastroenteropancreatic NEC.

Efficacy of checkpoint inhibition in advanced acral melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21527-e21527
Author(s):  
Melissa Melanie de Meza ◽  
Olivier Jules van Not ◽  
Willeke Blokx ◽  
Han J. Bonenkamp ◽  
Christian U. Blank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
First Line ◽  
Acral Melanoma ◽  
Limited Efficacy ◽  
First Line Treatment

e21527 Background: Recent data in Japanese patients suggest poor outcomes for anti-PD1 in acral melanoma (AM), with no data available on combination treatment. The objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy of anti-PD1 monotherapy and anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 combination therapy in these patients. Methods: Our study population consisted of patients registered in the nationwide prospective Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry between 2014 and 2020. We calculated objective response rate (ORR) in all unresectable stage III and IV AM and nonacral cutaneous melanoma (NAM) patients treated with anti-PD1, and combination anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4. Progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated for first-line treated patients. A Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Nighty-five AM patients received at least one dose of anti-PD1 monotherapy, of whom 58 (61%) as first-line treatment. ORR was 28% (complete response 11%; partial response 18%). Median PFS and OS in patients with first-line treatment were 5.5 months (95% CI 3.5-8.4) and 14 months (95% CI 9.3-25.0). In patients with NAM (n = 1259) ORR was 48% (complete response 18%; partial response 31%). Six-hundred and eighty-eight (55%) patients received anti-PD1 as first-line treatment. Median PFS was 11.7 months (95% CI 9.1-14.9) and median OS was 24 months (95% CI 20.0-29.3) in these patients. Older age, higher ECOG scores, elevated LDH levels, liver metastasis and brain metastasis were significantly associated with lower OS. After adjustment for covariates, acral subtype remained associated with shorter PFS (Hazard Ratio 1.76, 95% CI 1.25-2.48) and OS (Hazard Ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.17-2.45). Twenty-four AM patients received at least one dose of anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4, of which 15 as first-line treatment. ORR was 25% (complete response 4%; partial response 20%). AM patients treated with first-line combination therapy had a median PFS of 3.8 months (95% CI 2.8-NR) and median OS of 7.63 months (95% CI 6.12-NR). ORR in NAM patients treated with combination therapy (n = 599) was 41% (complete response 8%; partial response 33%). Forty-six percent of these patients were treated in the first-line, with a median PFS of 9.7 months (95% CI 6.6-17.1) and median OS of 21.3 months (95% CI 14.6-36.5). Elevated LDH levels and the presence of BRAF mutation were significantly associated with lower OS. No significant association was found between acral subtype and PFS, or OS after adjustment for covariates. Conclusions: This study shows limited efficacy of anti-PD1 for advanced AM, with clinically relevant lower response rates compared to nonacral melanoma types. Although caution is needed because of relatively small numbers and the observational nature of our study, our data confirm limited efficacy of checkpoint inhibition in AM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document