Supporting ageing well research: Findings from a research priority setting exercise

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Doolan‐Noble ◽  
Poonam Mehta ◽  
Debra Waters ◽  
George David Baxter
Keyword(s):  
Priority Setting ◽  
Research Priority ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Priority Setting Exercise

scholarly journals National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia research priority setting exercise

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Howell ◽  
J.J. Pandit ◽  
D.J. Rowbotham
Keyword(s):  
Priority Setting ◽  
Research Priority ◽  
Priority Setting Exercise

Orthopaedic trauma research priority-setting exercise and development of a research network

Injury ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 763-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.M. Willett ◽  
B. Gray ◽  
C.G. Moran ◽  
P.V. Giannoudis ◽  
I. Pallister
Keyword(s):  
Priority Setting ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Trauma Research ◽  
Research Priority ◽  
Priority Setting Exercise

scholarly journals Orthopaedic trauma research priority setting exercise and development of a research network

Injury Extra ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
K. Willett ◽  
B. Gray ◽  
C. Moran ◽  
P. Giannoudis ◽  
I. Pallister
Keyword(s):  
Priority Setting ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Trauma Research ◽  
Research Priority ◽  
Priority Setting Exercise

scholarly journals Sharing power in global health research: an ethical toolkit for designing priority-setting processes that meaningfully include communities

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget Pratt
Keyword(s):  
Global Health ◽  
Priority Setting ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Reflective Equilibrium ◽  
Empirical Work ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Project Planning ◽  
Global Health Research ◽  
Research Priority ◽  
Health Research Priority Setting

AbstractTo promote social justice and equity, global health research should meaningfully engage communities throughout projects: from setting agendas onwards. But communities, especially those that are considered disadvantaged or marginalised, rarely have a say in the priorities of the research projects that aim to help them. So far, there remains limited ethical guidance and resources on how to share power with communities in health research priority-setting. This paper presents an “ethical toolkit” for academic researchers and their community partners to use to design priority-setting processes that meaningfully include the communities impacted by their projects. An empirical reflective equilibrium approach was employed to develop the toolkit. Conceptual work articulated ethical considerations related to sharing power in g0l0o0bal health research priority-setting, developed guidance on how to address them, and created an initial version of the toolkit. Empirical work (51 in-depth interviews, 1 focus group, 2 case studies in India and the Philippines) conducted in 2018 and 2019 then tested those findings against information from global health research practice. The final ethical toolkit is a reflective project planning aid. It consists of 4 worksheets (Worksheet 1- Selecting Partners; Worksheet 2- Deciding to Partner; Worksheet 3- Deciding to Engage with the Wider Community; Worksheet 4- Designing Priority-setting) and a Companion Document detailing how to use them. Reflecting on and discussing the questions in Worksheets 1 to 4 before priority-setting will help deliver priority-setting processes that share power with communities and projects with research topics and questions that more accurately reflect their healthcare and system needs.

scholarly journals The kidney cancer research priority-setting partnership: Identifying the top 10 research priorities as defined by patients, caregivers, and expert clinicians

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 379-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Jones ◽  
Jaimin Bhatt ◽  
Jonathan Avery ◽  
Andreas Laupacis ◽  
Katherine Cowan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Research ◽  
Kidney Cancer ◽  
Priority Setting ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Cancer Research Network ◽  
Research Priority ◽  
Funding Agencies ◽  
James Lind Alliance ◽  
Priority Setting Partnership

It is critically important to define disease-specific research priorities to better allocate limited resources. There is growing recognition of the value of involving patients and caregivers, as well as expert clinicians in this process. To our knowledge, this has not been done this way for kidney cancer. Using the transparent and inclusive process established by the James Lind Alliance, the Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada (KCRNC) sponsored a collaborative consensus-based priority-setting partnership (PSP) to identify research priorities in the management of kidney cancer. The final result was identification of 10 research priorities for kidney cancer, which are discussed in the context of current initiatives and gaps in knowledge. This process provided a systematic and effective way to collaboratively establish research priorities with patients, caregivers, and clinicians, and provides a valuable resource for researchers and funding agencies.

scholarly journals Global health trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise

Trials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Rosala-Hallas ◽  
Aneel Bhangu ◽  
Jane Blazeby ◽  
Louise Bowman ◽  
Mike Clarke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Health ◽  
Priority Setting ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Methodological Research ◽  
A Priority ◽  
Priority Setting Exercise

The Social Value of Research and Health Research Priority-Setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.M. Wenner
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Priority Setting ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Research Priority ◽  
The Social ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Social Scientific ◽  
Health Research Priority Setting

This chapter discusses the social value requirement in clinical research and its intersection with health research priority-setting. The social value requirement states that clinical research involving human subjects is only ethical if it has the potential to produce socially valuable knowledge. The chapter discusses various ways to specify both the justification for and the content of the social value requirement. It goes on to consider the implications of various accounts of the content and justification for the requirement for the ethics of health research priority-setting, showing that while some accounts of the requirement are largely silent with respect to how research questions should be prioritized, others entail robust obligations to prioritize research that might benefit particular groups. The chapter also briefly examines potential arguments for something like a social value requirement in other kinds of research, specifically social scientific research.

scholarly journals Research priority setting in Barrett's oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 824-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Britton ◽  
Lisa Gadeke ◽  
Laurence Lovat ◽  
Shaheen Hamdy ◽  
Chris Hawkey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Priority Setting ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Barrett’S Oesophagus ◽  
Oesophageal Reflux ◽  
Barrett's Oesophagus ◽  
Oesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Research Priority
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document