Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite resin along with fibre insertion in different positionsin vitro

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hena Rahman ◽  
Shailja Singh ◽  
Anil Chandra ◽  
Ramesh Chandra ◽  
Supratim Tripathi
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth

scholarly journals A Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth restored with Composite Resin Core using Two Different Designs of Prefabricated Metal Posts: An in vitro Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-102
Author(s):  
Sabita M Ram ◽  
Naisargi Shah ◽  
Amit M Gaikwad
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Fracture Load ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Group I ◽  
Resin Core ◽  
Post And Core ◽  
The Mean

ABSTRACT Aim To comparatively evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with light-cured composite resin core using two different designs of prefabricated metal posts. Materials and methods A total of 30 single-rooted anterior teeth were selected for the study and endodontically treated. Teeth were sectioned 2 mm above the cementoenamel junction and were randomly divided into two groups (n = 15). Teeth in group I were restored with Parallel post—EG post and group II with parallel post with coronal flare—i post. Light-cured composite core buildup was done in all samples using a customized core former. Compressive load was applied at a 135° angle to the long axis of the tooth at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/minute until visible signs of fracture were observed. Levene's test and t-test were used to determine the difference of the failure loads between the groups (α = 0.05). Results The mean values (standard deviation [SD]) for fracture resistance were 295.55 N and 469.59 N for parallel post—EG post and parallel post with coronal flare—i post respectively. Since the p-value for the t-test is less than 0.05, it indicates that we should reject null hypothesis and conclude that the mean fracture load of parallel post with coronal flare—i post is significantly more than that of mean fracture load of parallel post—EG post. Conclusion The study conducted evaluated that the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with parallel post with coronal flare—i post and core buildup had better strength as compared with parallel post—EG post and core buildup. Clinical significance The present study will help the clinician to select the appropriate prefabricated metal post that will fit exactly into the coronal flare of the canal improving clinical performance, thus increasing the longevity of the restoration. How to cite this article Gaikwad AM, Shah N, Ram SM. A Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth restored with Composite Resin Core using Two Different Designs of Prefabricated Metal Posts: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent 2017;7(2):97-102.

scholarly journals Effect of post type and restorative techniques on the strain and fracture resistance of flared incisor roots

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisele Rodrigues da Silva ◽  
Paulo César de Freitas Santos-Filho ◽  
Paulo Cézar Simamoto-Júnior ◽  
Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins ◽  
Adérito Soares da Mota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Biomechanical Behavior ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Strain Fracture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Catastrophic Failures ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts

Restoring flared endodontically treated teeth continues to be a challenge for clinicians. This study evaluated the effect of post types and restorative techniques on the strain, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of incisors with weakened roots. One hundred five endodontically treated bovine incisors roots (15 mm) were divided into 7 groups (n=15). The two control groups were (C) intact roots restored with Cpc (cast posts and core) or Gfp (glass fiber posts). The five experimental groups were (F) flared roots restored with GfpAp (Gfp associated with accessory glass fiber posts), GfpRc (anatomic Gfp, relined with composite resin), and GfpRcAp (anatomized Gfp with resin and accessory glass fiber posts). All teeth were restored with metal crowns. Mechanical fatigue was performed with 3x10(5)/50 N. Specimens were loaded at 45º, and the strain values (μS) were obtained on root buccal and proximal surfaces. Following that, the fracture resistance (N) was measured. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests (α=0.05) were applied, and failure mode was checked. No significant difference in strain values among the groups was found. Cpc presented lower fracture resistance and more catastrophic failures in flared roots. Gfp associated with composite resin or accessory glass fiber posts seems to be an effective method to improve the biomechanical behavior of flared roots.

scholarly journals Comparison of the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts and composite resin cores with different post lenghts

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Accácio Lins do Valle ◽  
Jefferson Ricardo Pereira ◽  
Fábio Kenji Shiratori ◽  
Luiz Fernando Pegoraro ◽  
Bonfante Gerson
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Resin Cores

scholarly journals An assessment of fracture resistance of three composite resin core build-up materials on three prefabricated non-metallic posts, cemented in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalit Kumar ◽  
Bhupinder Pal ◽  
Prashant Pujari
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Resin Core ◽  
Post And Core ◽  
Strength And Durability ◽  
Core Materials

Endodontically treated teeth with excessive loss of tooth structure would require to be restored with post and core to enhance the strength and durability of the tooth and to achieve retention for the restoration. The non-metallic posts have of a superior esthetic quality. Various core materials can be used to build-up cores on the posts placed in endodontically treated teeth. The core materials would show variation in their bonding with the non-metallic posts and the remaining tooth structure. They will also have an effect on the strength and resistance to fracture of the remaining tooth structure. Aims: The aim of the study was to assess the fracture resistance of three composite resin core build-up materials on three prefabricated non-metallic posts, cemented in extracted endodontically treated teeth. Material and methods: Forty five freshly extracted maxillary central incisors of approximately of the same size and shape were selected for the study. Student’s unpaired ‘t’ test was also used to analyse and compare each group with the other groups individually, and decide whether their comparisons were statistically significant. Results: Luxacore showed the highest fracture resistance among the three core build-up materials with all the three posts systems. Ti-core had intermediate values of fracture resistance and Lumiglass had least values of fracture resistance.

scholarly journals An assessment of fracture resistance of three composite resin core build-up materials on three prefabricated non-metallic posts, cemented in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalit Kumar ◽  
Bhupinder Pal ◽  
Prashant Pujari
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Resin Core ◽  
Post And Core ◽  
Strength And Durability ◽  
Core Materials

Endodontically treated teeth with excessive loss of tooth structure would require to be restored with post and core to enhance the strength and durability of the tooth and to achieve retention for the restoration. The non-metallic posts have of a superior esthetic quality. Various core materials can be used to build-up cores on the posts placed in endodontically treated teeth. The core materials would show variation in their bonding with the non-metallic posts and the remaining tooth structure. They will also have an effect on the strength and resistance to fracture of the remaining tooth structure. Aims: The aim of the study was to assess the fracture resistance of three composite resin core build-up materials on three prefabricated non-metallic posts, cemented in extracted endodontically treated teeth. Material and methods: Forty five freshly extracted maxillary central incisors of approximately of the same size and shape were selected for the study. Student’s unpaired ‘t’ test was also used to analyse and compare each group with the other groups individually, and decide whether their comparisons were statistically significant. Results: Luxacore showed the highest fracture resistance among the three core build-up materials with all the three posts systems. Ti-core had intermediate values of fracture resistance and Lumiglass had least values of fracture resistance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document