scholarly journals A Systematic review of behavioural smoking cessation interventions for people with severe mental ill health – what works?

Addiction ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Spanakis ◽  
Emily Peckham ◽  
Ben Young ◽  
Paul Heron ◽  
Della Bailey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
What Works ◽  
Severe Mental Ill Health

scholarly journals Smoking cessation in severe mental ill health: what works? an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Peckham ◽  
Sally Brabyn ◽  
Liz Cook ◽  
Garry Tew ◽  
Simon Gilbody
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
What Works ◽  
Severe Mental Ill Health

scholarly journals Smoking amongst adults experiencing homelessness: a systematic review of prevalence rates, interventions and the barriers and facilitators to quitting and staying quit

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirstie Soar ◽  
Lynne Dawkins ◽  
Deborah Robson ◽  
Sharon Cox
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Smoking Prevalence ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Smoking Reduction ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
What Works ◽  
Randomised Controlled

AbstractBackgroundTo date, there has been no review of the research evidence examining smoking cessation among homeless adults. The current review aimed to: (i) estimate smoking prevalence in homeless populations; (ii) explore the efficacy of smoking cessation and smoking reduction interventions for homeless individuals; and (iii) describe the barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation and smoking reduction.MethodSystematic review of peer-reviewed research. Data sources included electronic academic databases. Search terms: ‘smoking’ AND ‘homeless’ AND ‘tobacco’, including adult (18+ years) smokers accessing homeless support services.ResultsFifty-three studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 46 USA). Data could not be meta-analysed due to large methodological inconsistencies and the lack of randomised controlled trials. Smoking prevalence ranged from 57% to 82%. Although there was no clear evidence on which cessation methods work best, layered approaches with additions to usual care seemed to offer modest enhancements in quit rates. Key barriers to cessation exist around the priority of smoking, beliefs around negative impact on mental health and substance use, and environmental influences.ConclusionsHomeless smokers will benefit from layered interventions which support many of their competing needs. To best understand what works, future recommendations include the need for consensus on the reporting of cessation outcomes.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of e-cigarettes in smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Oberndorfer ◽  
I Grabovac ◽  
S Haider ◽  
T E Dorner
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Different Populations ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Reports of the effectiveness of e-cigarettes (ECs) for smoking cessation vary across different studies making implementation recommendations hard to attain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of ECs for smoking cessation. Methods PubMed, PsycInfo and Embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing nicotine ECs with non-nicotine ECs or with established smoking cessation interventions (nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and or counselling) published between 01/01/2014 and 01/05/2019. Data from eligible studies were extracted and used for random-effects meta-analyses. Results Our literature review yielded 13190 publications with 10 studies being identified as eligible for systematic review, covering 8362 participants, and 8 for meta-analyses (n = 30 - 6006). Using the last follow-up of eligible studies, the proportion of smokers achieving abstinence was 1.67 [95CI:0.99 - 2.81] times higher in nicotine EC users compared to non-nicotine EC users. The proportion of abstinent smokers was 1.69 [95CI:1.25 - 2.27] times higher in EC users compared to participants receiving NRT. EC users showed a 2.70 [95CI:1.15 - 6.30] times higher proportion of abstinent smokers in comparison to participants solely receiving counselling. Conclusions Our analysis showed modest effects of nicotine-ECs compared to non-nicotine ECs. When compared to NRT or counselling, results suggest that nicotine EC may be more effective for smoking cessation. As ECs also help maintaining routinized behaviour and social aspects of smoking, we hypothesise that this may explain their advantage as a tool for smoking cessation. However, given the small number of included studies, different populations, heterogeneous designs, and the overall moderate to low quality of evidence, it is not possible to offer clear recommendations. More comparable data is needed to strengthen confidence in the quality of evidence. Key messages The number of previous studies assessing the effectiveness of ECs for smoking cessation is limited. Further, comparability of these studies is restricted, weakening the quality of evidence. Although current evidence on the effectiveness of ECs for smoking cessation is inconclusive, our meta-analyses suggest that ECs could be a promising alternative tool in attempts to achieve abstinence.

scholarly journals Smoking Cessation Interventions for Patients with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Gierisch ◽  
Lori A. Bastian ◽  
Patrick S. Calhoun ◽  
Jennifer R. McDuffie ◽  
John W. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: A systematic review

Addiction ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Jackson ◽  
Amanda L. Baker ◽  
Gillian S. Gould ◽  
Amanda L. Brown ◽  
Adrian J. Dunlop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Substance Use ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Substance Use Disorders
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document