scholarly journals Mobile telephone‐delivered contingency management interventions promoting behaviour change in individuals with substance use disorders: a meta‐analysis

Addiction ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (11) ◽  
pp. 1915-1925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol‐Ann Getty ◽  
Ana Morande ◽  
Michael Lynskey ◽  
Tim Weaver ◽  
Nicola Metrebian
Author(s):  
Lynn McFarr ◽  
Julie Snyder ◽  
Lisa Benson ◽  
Rachel Higier

Multiple psychosocial treatments for substance-use disorders have been studied for efficacy. A recent meta-analysis indicates that psychosocial interventions are effective across multiple types of substances used. In the case of opiates, psychosocial interventions combined with medication appear to be the most effective. Many studies further agree that psychosocial interventions are an integral and necessary part of treating substance-use disorders. Although theoretical orientations may differ across psychosocial treatments, they have several principles and practices in common. All involve talk therapy or talk in communities as a way to clarify triggers, build commitment, and improve accountability. Many also target addiction behaviors and work to develop alternative contingencies to reduce or eliminate use. Finally, targeting repeated performance (or building “chains of committed behavior”) decreases the likelihood of relapse. This chapter discusses the most frequently studied and employed psychosocial treatments for substance use including CBT, motivational interviewing, contingency management, mindfulness, and community-based programs.


Addiction ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 101 (11) ◽  
pp. 1546-1560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Prendergast ◽  
Deborah Podus ◽  
John Finney ◽  
Lisa Greenwell ◽  
John Roll

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 907-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis J. Hand ◽  
Jennifer D. Ellis ◽  
Meagan M. Carr ◽  
Diane J. Abatemarco ◽  
David M. Ledgerwood

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 616
Author(s):  
Marianne Destoop ◽  
Lise Docx ◽  
Manuel Morrens ◽  
Geert Dom

Background: Substance use disorders (SUD) are highly prevalent among psychotic patients and are associated with poorer clinical and functional outcomes. Effective interventions for this clinical population are scarce and challenging. Contingency management (CM) is one of the most evidence-based treatments for SUD’s, however, a meta-analysis of the effect of CM in patients with a dual diagnosis of psychotic disorder and SUD has not been performed. Methods: We searched PubMed and PsycINFO databases up to December 2020. Results: Five controlled trials involving 892 patients were included. CM is effective on abstinence rates, measured by the number of self-reported days of using after intervention (95% CI −0.98 to −0.06) and by the number of negative breath or urine samples after intervention (OR 2.13; 95% CI 0.97 to 4.69) and follow-up (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.08). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis shows a potential effect of CM on abstinence for patients with SUD and (severe) psychotic disorders, although the number of studies is limited. Additional longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the sustained effectivity of CM and give support for a larger clinical implementation of CM within services targeting these vulnerable co-morbid patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 117-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan S. Herrmann ◽  
Alexis K. Matusiewicz ◽  
Maxine L. Stitzer ◽  
Stephen T. Higgins ◽  
Stacey C. Sigmon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 106920
Author(s):  
G. Aonso-Diego ◽  
A. González-Roz ◽  
A. Krotter ◽  
A. García-Pérez ◽  
R. Secades-Villa

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Penzenstadler ◽  
Ariella Machado ◽  
Gabriel Thorens ◽  
Daniele Zullino ◽  
Yasser Khazaal

2018 ◽  
Vol 193 ◽  
pp. 91-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Ornell ◽  
Fernanda Hansen ◽  
Felipe Barreto Schuch ◽  
Fernando Pezzini Rebelatto ◽  
Ana Laura Tavares ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document