scholarly journals Modelling the impact of incarceration and prison-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment on HCV transmission among people who inject drugs in Scotland

Addiction ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 1302-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Stone ◽  
Natasha K. Martin ◽  
Matthew Hickman ◽  
Sharon J. Hutchinson ◽  
Esther Aspinall ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Alexei Zelenev ◽  
Jianghong Li ◽  
Portia Shea ◽  
Robert Hecht ◽  
Frederick L Altice

Abstract Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment as prevention (TasP) strategies can contribute to HCV microelimination, yet complimentary interventions such as opioid agonist therapies (OAT) with methadone or buprenorphine and syringe services programs (SSPs) may improve the prevention impact. This modeling study estimates the impact of scaling up the combination of OAT and SSPs with HCV TasP in a network of people who inject drugs (PWID) in the United States. Methods Using empirical data from Hartford, Connecticut, we deployed a stochastic block model to simulate an injection network of 1574 PWID. We used a susceptible-infected model for HCV and human immunodeficiency virus to evaluate the effectiveness of several HCV TasP strategies, including in combination with OAT and SSP scale-up, over 20 years. Results At the highest HCV prevalence (75%), when OAT coverage is increased from 10% to 40%, combined with HCV treatment of 10% per year and SSP scale up to 40%, the time to achieve microelimination is reduced from 18.4 to 11.6 years. At the current HCV prevalence (60%), HCV TasP strategies as low as 10% coverage per year may achieve HCV microelimination within 10 years, with minimal impact from additional OAT scale-up. Strategies based on mass initial HCV treatment (50 per 100 PWID the first year followed by 5 per 100 PWID thereafter) were most effective in settings with HCV prevalence of 60% or lower. Conclusions Scale-up of HCV TasP is the most effective strategy for microelimination of HCV. OAT scale-up, however, scale-up may be synergistic toward achieving microelimination goals when HCV prevalence exceeds 60% and when HCV treatment coverage is 10 per 100 PWID per year or lower.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carissa E. Chu ◽  
Feng Wu ◽  
Xi He ◽  
Kali Zhou ◽  
Yu Cheng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background.  Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment access among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV-coinfected people who inject drugs is poor, despite a high burden of disease in this population. Understanding barriers and facilitators to HCV treatment uptake is critical to the implementation of new direct-acting antivirals. Methods.  We conducted in-depth interviews with patients, physicians, and social workers at an HIV treatment facility and methadone maintenance treatment centers in Guangzhou, China to identify barriers and facilitators to HCV treatment. We included patients who were in various stages of HCV treatment and those who were not treated. We used standard qualitative methods and organized data into themes. Results.  Interview data from 29 patients, 8 physicians, and 3 social workers were analyzed. Facilitators and barriers were organized according to a modified Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research schematic. Facilitators included patient trust in physicians, hope for a cure, peer networks, and social support. Barriers included ongoing drug use, low HCV disease knowledge, fragmented reimbursement systems, HIV exceptionalism, and stigma. Conclusions.  Expanding existing harm reduction programs, HIV treatment programs, and social services may facilitate scale-up of direct-acting antivirals globally. Improving integration of ancillary social and mental health services within existing HIV care systems may facilitate HCV treatment access.


Addiction ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (11) ◽  
pp. 2118-2131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Fraser ◽  
Christinah Mukandavire ◽  
Natasha K. Martin ◽  
David Goldberg ◽  
Norah Palmateer ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e024288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Parent ◽  
Kate Salters ◽  
Lindila Awendila ◽  
Lianping Ti

IntroductionMany women living with hepatitis C (HCV) are of childbearing age. While the risk of vertical HCV transmission has been well established, the impact of HCV on pregnancy outcomes are equivocal, with some studies reporting risks of preterm birth, low gestational weight, gestational diabetes and hypertension, while other studies report no such risks. With the shift of the HCV treatment landscape to more effective, tolerable and shorter medications, understanding pregnancy outcomes of women living with HCV are an important consideration in order to provide a baseline from which to consider the usefulness and safety of HCV treatment for this population. The objective of this systematic review will be to investigate pregnancy outcomes associated with maternal HCV infection.Methods and analysisThis systematic review will incorporate articles relevant to pregnancy outcomes among women living with HCV (eg, gestational diabetes and caesarean delivery). Articles will be retrieved from academic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, clinicaltrial.gov and the Cochrane Library and hand searching of conference proceedings and reference lists. A database search will not be restricted by date, and conference abstract will be restricted to the past 2 years. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale will be used to assess the quality of the retrieved studies. Data will be extracted and scored independently by two authors. A narrative account will synthesise the findings to answer the objectives of this review.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review will synthesise the literature on the pregnancy outcomes of women living with HCV. Results from this review will be disseminated to clinical audiences, community groups and policy-makers, and may support clinicians and decision-makers in developing guidelines to promote best outcomes for this population.


2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. S811
Author(s):  
J. Stone ◽  
N.K. Martin ◽  
M. Hickman ◽  
S. Hutchinson ◽  
E. Aspinall ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Stone ◽  
Josephine G Walker ◽  
Sandra Bivegete ◽  
Adam Trickey ◽  
Charles Chasela ◽  
...  

Introduction People who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine have a high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Since 2015, PWID have been receiving HCV treatment, but their impact and cost-effectiveness has not been estimated. Methods We developed a dynamic model of HIV and HCV transmission among PWID in Ukraine, incorporating ongoing HCV treatment (5,933 treatments) over 2015-2021; 46.1% among current PWID. We estimated the impact of these treatments and different treatment scenarios over 2021-2030: continuing recent treatment rates (2,394 PWID/year) with 42.5/100% among current PWID, or treating 5,000/10,000 current PWID/year. We also estimated the treatment rate required to decrease HCV incidence by 80% if preventative interventions are scaled-up or not. Required costs were collated from previous studies in Ukraine. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the HCV treatments undertaken in 2020 (1,059) by projecting the incremental costs and disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted over 2020-2070 (3% discount rate) compared to a counterfactual scenario without treatment from 2020 onwards. Results On average, 0.4% of infections among PWID were treated annually over 2015-2021, without which HCV incidence would have been 0.6% (95%CrI: 0.3-1.0%) higher in 2021. Continuing existing treatment rates could reduce HCV incidence by 10.2% (7.8-12.5%) or 16.4% (12.1-22.0%) by 2030 if 42.5% or 100% of treatments are given to current PWID, respectively. HCV incidence could reduce by 29.3% (20.7-44.7%) or 93.9% (54.3-99.9%) by 2030 if 5,000 or 10,000 PWID are treated annually. To reduce incidence by 80% by 2030, 19,275 (15,134-23,522) annual treatments are needed among current PWID, or 17,955 (14,052-21,954) if preventative interventions are scaled-up. The mean ICER was US$828.8/DALY averted; cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$3,096/DALY averted (1xGDP). Implications Existing HCV treatment is cost-effective but has had little preventative impact due to few current PWID being treated. Further treatment expansion for current PWID could significantly reduce HCV incidence.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (47) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivian D Hope ◽  
Ross J Harris ◽  
Peter Vickerman ◽  
Lucy Platt ◽  
Justin Shute ◽  
...  

Background Monitoring hepatitis C virus (HCV) incidence is important for assessing intervention impact. Longitudinal studies of people who inject drugs (PWID), using repeated biological tests, are costly; alternatively, incidence can be estimated using biological markers of recent infection in cross-sectional studies. Aim We aimed to compare incidence estimates obtained from two different biological markers of recent infection in a cross-sectional study to inform monitoring approaches for HCV elimination strategies. Method Samples from an unlinked anonymous bio-behavioural survey of PWID were tested for two recent infection markers: HCV RNA with anti-HCV negative (‘RNA’) and low-avidity anti-HCV with HCV RNA present (‘avidity’). These two markers were used separately and in combination to estimate HCV incidence. Results Between 2011 and 2013, 2,816 anti-HIV-negative PWID (25% female) who had injected during the preceding year were either HCV-negative or had one of the two markers of recent infection: 57 (2.0%) had the RNA marker and 90 (3.2%) the avidity marker. The two markers had similar distributions of risk and demographic factors. Pooled estimated incidence was 12.3 per 100 person-years (pyrs) (95% credible interval: 8.8–17.0) and not significantly different to avidity-only (p = 0.865) and RNA-only (p = 0.691) estimates. However, the RNA marker is limited by its short duration before anti-HCV seroconversion and the avidity marker by uncertainty around its duration. Conclusion Both markers have utility in monitoring HCV incidence among PWID. When HCV transmission is high, one marker may provide an accurate estimate of incidence; when it is low or decreasing, a combination may be required.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 1397-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Gutkind ◽  
Bruce R Schackman ◽  
Jake R Morgan ◽  
Jared A Leff ◽  
Linda Agyemang ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundMany people who inject drugs in the United States have chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). On-site treatment in opiate agonist treatment (OAT) programs addresses HCV treatment barriers, but few evidence-based models exist.MethodsWe evaluated the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment models for OAT patients using data from a randomized trial conducted in Bronx, New York. We used a decision analytic model to compare self-administered individual treatment (SIT), group treatment (GT), directly observed therapy (DOT), and no intervention for a simulated cohort with the same demographic characteristics of trial participants. We projected long-term outcomes using an established model of HCV disease progression and treatment (hepatitis C cost-effectiveness model: HEP-CE). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are reported in 2016 US$/quality-adjusted life years (QALY), discounted 3% annually, from the healthcare sector and societal perspectives.ResultsFor those assigned to SIT, we projected 89% would ever achieve a sustained viral response (SVR), with 7.21 QALYs and a $245 500 lifetime cost, compared to 22% achieving SVR, with 5.49 QALYs and a $161 300 lifetime cost, with no intervention. GT was more efficient than SIT, resulting in 0.33 additional QALYs and a $14 100 lower lifetime cost per person, with an ICER of $34 300/QALY, compared to no intervention. DOT was slightly more effective and costly than GT, with an ICER > $100 000/QALY, compared to GT. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, GT and DOT were preferred in 91% of simulations at a threshold of <$100 000/QALY; conclusions were similar from the societal perspective.ConclusionsAll models were associated with high rates of achieving SVR, compared to standard care. GT and DOT treatment models should be considered as cost-effective alternatives to SIT.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Stocks ◽  
Leah J. Martin ◽  
Sharon Kühlmann-Berenzon ◽  
Tom Britton

AbstractTo reach the WHO goal of hepatitis C elimination, it is essential to identify the number of people unaware of their hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and to investigate the effect of interventions on the disease transmission dynamics. In many middle- and high-income countries, one of the primary routes of HCV transmission is via contaminated needles shared by people who inject drugs (PWIDs). However, substantial underreporting combined with high uncertainty regarding the size of this difficult to reach population, makes it challenging to estimate the core indicators recommended by the WHO. To help enable countries to monitor their progress towards the elimination goal, we present a novel multi-layered dynamic transmission model for HCV transmission within a PWID population. The model explicitly accounts for disease stage (acute and chronic), injection drug use status (active and former PWIDs), status of diagnosis (diagnosed and undiagnosed) and country of disease acquisition (domestic or abroad). First, based on this model, and using routine surveillance data, we estimate the number of undiagnosed PWIDs, the true incidence, the average time until diagnosis, the reproduction numbers and associated uncertainties. Second, we examine the impact of two interventions on disease dynamics: 1) direct-acting antiviral drug treatment, and 2) needle exchange programs. To make the model accessible to relevant users and to support communication of our results to public health decision makers, the model and its output are made available through a Shiny app. As a proof of concept, we illustrate our results for a specific data set; however, through the app our model can be easily adapted to other high-income countries with similar transmission patterns among PWIDs where the disease is endemic.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mawuena Binka ◽  
Elijah Paintsil ◽  
Amisha Patel ◽  
Brett D. Lindenbach ◽  
Robert Heimer

Abstract Background.  Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission among people who inject drugs (PWID) is associated with the sharing of injection paraphernalia. People who inject drugs often “disinfect” used syringes with household products when new syringes are unavailable. We assessed the effectiveness of these products in disinfecting HCV-contaminated syringes. Methods.  A genotype-2a reporter virus assay was used to assess HCV infectivity in syringes postrinsing. Hepatitis C virus-contaminated 1 mL insulin syringes with fixed needles and 1 mL tuberculin syringes with detachable needles were rinsed with water, Clorox bleach, hydrogen peroxide, ethanol, isopropanol, Lysol, or Dawn Ultra at different concentrations. Syringes were either immediately tested for viable virus or stored at 4°C, 22°C, and 37°C for up to 21 days before viral infectivity was determined. Results.  Most products tested reduced HCV infectivity to undetectable levels in insulin syringes. Bleach eliminated HCV infectivity in both syringes. Other disinfectants produced virus recovery ranging from high (5% ethanol, 77% ± 12% HCV-positive syringes) to low (1:800 Dawn Ultra, 7% ± 7% positive syringes) in tuberculin syringes. Conclusions.  Household disinfectants tested were more effective in fixed-needle syringes (low residual volume) than in syringes with detachable needles (high residual volume). Bleach was the most effective disinfectant after 1 rinse, whereas other diluted household products required multiple rinses to eliminate HCV. Rinsing with water, 5% ethanol (as in beer), and 20% ethanol (as in fortified wine) was ineffective and should be avoided. Our data suggest that rinsing of syringes with household disinfectants may be an effective tool in preventing HCV transmission in PWID when done properly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document