Robust mapping of human–wildlife conflict: controlling for livestock distribution in carnivore depredation models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Kuiper ◽  
Andrew J. Loveridge ◽  
David W. Macdonald
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Conflict ◽  
Human Wildlife Conflict

Local responses to marginalisation: human—wildlife conflict in Ethiopia's wetlands

Geography ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan B. Dixon ◽  
Afework Hailu ◽  
Tilahun Semu ◽  
Legesse Taffa
Keyword(s):  
Local Responses ◽  
Wildlife Conflict ◽  
Human Wildlife Conflict

Moral dimensions of human-wildlife conflict

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1200-1211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L. Lute ◽  
Carlos David Navarrete ◽  
Michael Paul Nelson ◽  
Meredith L. Gore
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Conflict ◽  
Moral Dimensions ◽  
Human Wildlife Conflict

scholarly journals No single solution: application of behavioural principles in mitigating human–wildlife conflict

2016 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 245-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley F. Blackwell ◽  
Travis L. DeVault ◽  
Esteban Fernández-Juricic ◽  
Eric M. Gese ◽  
Lynne Gilbert-Norton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wildlife Conflict ◽  
Single Solution ◽  
Human Wildlife Conflict

To Protect and Kill: US Fish and Wildlife Service’s Management of Human–Wildlife Conflict, 1996-2011

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Lynch
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
The State ◽  
The Political ◽  
State Agencies ◽  
Economic Factors ◽  
Green Criminology ◽  
Wildlife Conflict ◽  
Nonhuman Animals ◽  
Conflicting Interests ◽  
Human Wildlife Conflict

AbstractHarms against nonhuman animals have become a significant concern in different disciplines (e.g., green criminology). This paper presents a multi-disciplinary discussion of one form of animal harm—wildlife harm—created by state agencies charged with protecting animals. Specifically, this issue is examined by reviewing the complex problems faced by theUSFish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), which is charged with competing objectives: between protecting economic and public health interests, and protecting wildlife. In managing the human–wildlife conflicts brought to its attention, theUSFWSmust often make tradeoffs between protecting economic and public health interests, and protecting wildlife. As the data reviewed here indicate, this leads theUSFWSto kill a large number of animals each year to protect economic and public health interests—more than 40 million animals since 1996. The political and economic factors that influence these killings, and how the state balances conflicting interests, are also examined.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document