Relative importance of prey abundance and habitat structure as drivers of shorebird breeding success and abundance

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 535-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. T. Douglas ◽  
James W. Pearce-Higgins
The Condor ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 567-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Marzluff ◽  
Bryan A. Kimsey ◽  
Linda S. Schueck ◽  
Mary E. McFadzen ◽  
Mark S. Vekasy ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 518-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Clark ◽  
Daryl E. Meger ◽  
Jordan B. Ignatiuk

The American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchs) is reputed to be an important predator of duck eggs, but its potential impact has not been evaluated adequately. We removed breeding crows from their territories prior to and during the duck breeding season to test whether duck nesting success would increase. Nesting success in two removal areas did not differ from that of two control areas. Our results are consistent with several studies indicating that removal of one predator species from a community of predators, including corvids, does not lead to predictable increases in breeding success of game birds. Further work is needed to determine the relative importance of different predators and to learn why removal of one predator species is generally ineffective.


1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey F. Kelly

Foraging trials were conducted using belted kingfishers (Ceryle alcyon) to examine relationships among prey abundance, availability, and use. Because these relationships are affected by the preference of the predator, I also determined the prey preference of belted kingfishers. Fish (Pimephales promelas and Catostomus commersoni) and crayfish (Orconectes spp.) were exposed to predation by 12 wild belted kingfishers under 4 treatments in which prey availability was manipulated by altering habitat structure. The preferred prey of belted kingfishers were relatively large fish (11–13 cm long). In structurally simple habitats, prey use by belted kingfishers reflected this preference. Complex habitat structure reduced the availability of preferred prey items and resulted in prey use that did not differ from the initial prey abundance distribution. These experiments demonstrated that prey abundance was not equivalent to availability and that habitat structure and prey preference had important effects on the relationships among prey abundance, availability, and use. Thus, evaluating the importance of prey resources to predators on the basis of prey abundance–use comparisons, while ignoring prey availability and the dynamic factors that influence it, may lead to erroneous conclusions.


2001 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Moss ◽  
James Oswald ◽  
David Baines

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A678-A679
Author(s):  
G ANDERSON ◽  
S WILKINS ◽  
T MURPHY ◽  
G CLEGHORN ◽  
D FRAZER

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document