scholarly journals Hospital Observation Upon Reversal (HOUR) With Naloxone: A Prospective Clinical Prediction Rule Validation Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Clemency ◽  
William Eggleston ◽  
Evan W. Shaw ◽  
Michael Cheung ◽  
Nicholas S. Pokoj ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-237
Author(s):  
Laurie J. Morrison ◽  
Laura M. Visentin ◽  
Alex Kiss ◽  
Rob Theriault ◽  
Don Eby ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 141 (12) ◽  
pp. 920 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Childs ◽  
Julie M. Fritz ◽  
Timothy W. Flynn ◽  
James J. Irrgang ◽  
Kevin K. Johnson ◽  
...  

CMAJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. E444-E453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Émond ◽  
Chantal Guimont ◽  
Jean-Marc Chauny ◽  
Raoul Daoust ◽  
Éric Bergeron ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Eliot Hodgson ◽  
Nicholas Dragolea ◽  
Richard Venn ◽  
Borislav D Dimitrov ◽  
Lui G Forni

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e002150
Author(s):  
Francesca M Chappell ◽  
Fay Crawford ◽  
Margaret Horne ◽  
Graham P Leese ◽  
Angela Martin ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe aim of the study was to develop and validate a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for foot ulceration in people with diabetes.Research design and methodsDevelopment of a CPR using individual participant data from four international cohort studies identified by systematic review, with validation in a fifth study. Development cohorts were from primary and secondary care foot clinics in Europe and the USA (n=8255, adults over 18 years old, with diabetes, ulcer free at recruitment). Using data from monofilament testing, presence/absence of pulses, and participant history of previous ulcer and/or amputation, we developed a simple CPR to predict who will develop a foot ulcer within 2 years of initial assessment and validated it in a fifth study (n=3324). The CPR’s performance was assessed with C-statistics, calibration slopes, calibration-in-the-large, and a net benefit analysis.ResultsCPR scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 had a risk of ulcer within 2 years of 2.4% (95% CI 1.5% to 3.9%), 6.0% (95% CI 3.5% to 9.5%), 14.0% (95% CI 8.5% to 21.3%), 29.2% (95% CI 19.2% to 41.0%), and 51.1% (95% CI 37.9% to 64.1%), respectively. In the validation dataset, calibration-in-the-large was −0.374 (95% CI −0.561 to −0.187) and calibration slope 1.139 (95% CI 0.994 to 1.283). The C-statistic was 0.829 (95% CI 0.790 to 0.868). The net benefit analysis suggested that people with a CPR score of 1 or more (risk of ulceration 6.0% or more) should be referred for treatment.ConclusionThe clinical prediction rule is simple, using routinely obtained data, and could help prevent foot ulcers by redirecting care to patients with scores of 1 or above. It has been validated in a community setting, and requires further validation in secondary care settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document