scholarly journals The Impact of Maryland's Global Budget Payment Reform on Emergency Department Admission Rates in a Single Health System

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica E. Galarraga ◽  
William J. Frohna ◽  
Jesse M. Pines
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health System ◽  
Global Budget ◽  
Payment Reform ◽  
Emergency Department Admission ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
The Impact

Variation In Emergency Department Admission Rates Among Medicare Patients: Does The Physician Matter?

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-257
Author(s):  
Peter B. Smulowitz ◽  
A. James O’Malley ◽  
Lawrence Zaborski ◽  
J. Michael McWilliams ◽  
Bruce E. Landon
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Department Admission ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Medicare Patients

scholarly journals Retrospective evaluation of healthcare utilisation and mortality of two post-discharge care programmes in Singapore

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e027220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Yi Han Ang ◽  
Chuen Seng Tan ◽  
Milawaty Nurjono ◽  
Xin Quan Tan ◽  
Gerald Choon-Huat Koh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Health System ◽  
Emergency Admission ◽  
Healthcare Utilisation ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Discharge Care ◽  
High Acuity ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact on healthcare utilisation frequencies and charges, and mortality of a programme for frequent hospital utilisers and a programme for patients requiring high acuity post-discharge care as part of an integrated healthcare model.DesignA retrospective quasi-experimental study without randomisation where patients who received post-discharge care interventions were matched 1:1 with unenrolled patients as controls.SettingThe National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS), which was one of six RHS in Singapore, implemented the NUHS RHS Integrated Interventions and Care Extension (NICE) programme for frequent hospital utilisers and the NUHS Transitional Care Programme (NUHS TCP) for high acuity post-discharge care. The programmes were supported by the Ministry of Health in Singapore, which is a city-state nation located in Southeast Asia with a 5.6 million population.ParticipantsLinked healthcare administrative data, for the time period of January 2013 to December 2016, were extracted for patients enrolled in NICE (n=554) or NUHS TCP (n=270) from June 2014 to December 2015, and control patients.InterventionsFor both programmes, teams conducted follow-up home visits and phone calls to monitor and manage patients’ post-discharge.Primary outcome measuresOne-year pre- and post-enrolment healthcare utilisation frequencies and charges of all-cause inpatient admissions, emergency admissions, emergency department attendances, specialist outpatient clinic (SOC) attendances, total inpatient length of stay and mortality rates were compared.ResultsPatients in NICE had lower mortality rate, but higher all-cause inpatient admission, emergency admission and emergency department attendance charges. Patients in NUHS TCP did not have lower mortality rate, but had higher emergency admission and SOC attendance charges.ConclusionsBoth NICE and NUHS TCP had no improvements in 1 year healthcare utilisation across various setting and metrics. Singular interventions might not be as impactful in effecting utilisation without an overhauling transformation and restructuring of the hospital and healthcare system.

scholarly journals Impact of a specialist service in the Emergency Department on admission, length of stay and readmission of patients presenting with falls, syncope and dizziness

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Jusmanova ◽  
C Rice ◽  
R Bourke ◽  
A Lavan ◽  
C G McMahon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Specialist Service ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

Summary Background Up to half of patients presenting with falls, syncope or dizziness are admitted to hospital. Many are discharged without a clear diagnosis for their index episode, however, and therefore a relatively high risk of readmission. Aim To examine the impact of ED-FASS (Emergency Department Falls and Syncope Service) a dedicated specialist service embedded within an ED, seeing patients of all ages with falls, syncope and dizziness. Design Pre- and post-cohort study. Methods Admission rates, length of stay (LOS) and readmission at 3 months were examined for all patients presenting with a fall, syncope or dizziness from April to July 2018 (pre-ED-FASS) inclusive and compared to April to July 2019 inclusive (post-ED-FASS). Results There was a significantly lower admission rate for patients presenting in 2019 compared to 2018 [27% (453/1676) vs. 34% (548/1620); X2 = 18.0; P < 0.001], with a 20% reduction in admissions. The mean LOS for patients admitted in 2018 was 20.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.4–24.0] days compared to 18.2 (95% CI 14.6–21.9) days in 2019 (t = 0.98; P = 0.3294). This accounts for 11 344 bed days in the 2018 study period, and 8299 bed days used after ED-FASS. There was also a significant reduction in readmission rates within 3 months of index presentation, from 21% (109/1620) to 16% (68/1676) (X2 = 4.68; P = 0.030). Conclusion This study highlights the significant potential benefits of embedding dedicated multidisciplinary services at the hospital front door in terms of early specialist assessment and directing appropriate patients to effective ambulatory care pathways.

Initial evaluation of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer within a community health system.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
Kathryn Tzung-Kai Chen
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health System ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Outpatient Clinic ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Initial Evaluation ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
The Impact

269 Background: The management of pancreatic patients who are referred to a tertiary care center is well described. However, many patients receive their initial evaluation and care at community health systems. We sought to describe how patients present within the community, the patterns of initial evaluation, and the impact on management. Methods: In a period spanning 3 years (2010-2013), 82 patients were newly diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, as identified by a cancer registry at a community health system. Under IRB approval, data regarding patient characteristics, initial evaluation, and management were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical record (EMR) and analyzed. Results: Of the 82 patients, 68 patients had sufficient data available in the EMR for analysis. Thirty-two patients (47%) initially presented to outpatient clinic, and 36 patients (53%) presented to the emergency department. The presenting complaint was identified as abdominal pain in 33 patients (49%), jaundice in 20 patients (29%), and general malaise in 9 patients (13%). Patients who presented through outpatient clinic vs. emergency department received similar initial imaging studies upfront, including CT of the abdomen and pelvis (61% vs. 72%) and abdominal ultrasound (27% vs. 17%). Sixteen percent of those patients evaluated in outpatient clinic were subsequently admitted, compared to 94% of those patients evaluated in the emergency department. Finally, 31% of those presenting in outpatient clinic eventually underwent surgical resection, compared to 8% of those presenting through the ER, and the median time to surgery for the entire cohort was 1.1 months. Conclusions: Within the community, half of all patients present through the emergency department, and the majority of these are admitted for work up and management of symptoms. In contrast, those patients who present through outpatient clinic are less likely to be admitted, and are more likely to undergo definitive resection. This likely represents a disparity on several levels: the acuity of patients presenting to the emergency department vs. clinic, and how they are managed in each setting.

scholarly journals P021: Impact of emergency department surge and end of shift on patient workup and treatment prior to referral to internal medicine

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S85-S85
Author(s):  
V. Charbonneau ◽  
I.G. Stiell ◽  
E.S. Kwok ◽  
L. Boyle
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Medicine Service ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The goal of this study was to determine if emergency department (ED) surge and end of shift assessment of patients affect the extent of diagnostic tests, therapeutic interventions performed and accuracy of diagnosis prior to referral of patients to Internal Medicine as well as the impact on patient outcomes. Methods: This study was a health records review of consecutive patients referred to the internal medicine service with an ED diagnosis of heart failure, COPD or sepsis, at two tertiary care EDs. We developed a scoring system in consultation with senior emergency and internal medicine physicians to uniformly assess the treatments and investigations performed for patients diagnosed in the ED with heart failure, COPD or sepsis. These scores were then correlated with surge levels and time of day at patient assessment and disposition. Rate of admission and diagnosis disagreements were also assessed. Results: We included 308 patients (101 with heart failure, 101 with COPD, 106 with sepsis). Comparing middle of shift to end of shift, the overall weighted mean scores were 92.2% vs. 91.7% for investigations and 73.5% vs. 70.0% for treatments. Comparing low to high surge times, the overall weighted mean scores were 89.9% vs. 92.6% for investigations and 68.6% vs. 71.7% for treatments. Evaluating each condition separately for investigations and treatments according to time of shift or surge conditions, there were no consistent differences in scores. We found overall high admission rates (93.1 % for heart failure, 91.1% for COPD, 96.2% for sepsis patients), and low rates of diagnosis disagreement (4.0 % heart failure, 10.9% COPD, 8.5% sepsis). Conclusion: We found that surge levels and end of shift did not impact the extent of investigations and treatments provided to patients diagnosed in the emergency department with heart failure, COPD or sepsis and referred to internal medicine. Admission rates for the patients referred were above 90% and there were very few diagnosis disagreements or diversion to alternate service by internal medicine. We believe this supports the emergency physician's ability to adapt to time and surge constraints, particularly in the context of commonly encountered conditions.

scholarly journals Variation in US Hospital Emergency Department Admission Rates by Clinical Condition

Medical Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjun K. Venkatesh ◽  
Ying Dai ◽  
Joseph S. Ross ◽  
Jeremiah D. Schuur ◽  
Roberta Capp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Condition ◽  
Hospital Emergency Department ◽  
Hospital Emergency ◽  
Emergency Department Admission ◽  
Admission Rates
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document