Socio-cultural innovations of the Final Umm an-Nar period (c.2100-2000 BCE) in the Oman peninsula: new insights from Ra's al-Jinz RJ-2

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina M. Azzarà ◽  
Alexandre P. De Rorre
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason T. Herrmann ◽  
Jesse Casana ◽  
Hussein Suleiman Qandil
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-101
Author(s):  
Alicia Van Ham-Meert ◽  
Sarah Dillis ◽  
Bruno Overlaet ◽  
Patrick Degryse

1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-77
Author(s):  
M. James Blackman ◽  
Sophie Mery ◽  
Rita P. Wright
Keyword(s):  

1960 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. S. Hudson

AbstractThe lower part of the limestone succession of the Hagab Monocline in the Oman Peninsula, Arabia, is divided into the Bih Dolomite (Permian, 650 m.), Hagil Limestone (Permian, 260 m.), Ghail Limestone (Trias, 600 m.) and the Elphinstone Beds (Noric, 431 m.). The latter consists of five formations, two of which are very fossiliferous. The succession also occurs to the south in borings in the forelands of the Oman Mountains and is similar to that of the foreland of the Zagros Range of Iran.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-300
Author(s):  
Nasser S. Al‐Jahwari ◽  
Khaled A. Douglas ◽  
Mohamad A. Hesein

Author(s):  
Kimberly D. Williams ◽  
Lesley A. Gregoricka

The shift between Hafit (ca. 3100–2700 BC) and Umm an-Nar (ca. 2700–2000 BC) mortuary traditions on the Oman Peninsula is poorly understood, primarily because the semi-nomadic communities of this liminal period left little to the archaeological record, with the exception of monumental tombs. Because of the ambiguity surrounding this transition, tombs from this time are typically classified as either ‘Hafit’ or ‘Umm an-Nar’ without regard for the considerable geographic and temporal variation in tomb structure and membership throughout southeastern Arabia. Recent survey and excavation of a Bronze Age necropolis at Al Khubayb in the Sultanate of Oman have revealed Transitional tombs that—far from exhibiting a simplified dichotomy—represent a blurring of the traditionally discrete boundaries dividing the Hafit and Umm an-Nar periods. Bioarchaeological analyses of tombs at Al Khubayb further enable researchers to make a distinction between tomb types and elucidate the process by which mortuary treatments changed. Over the late fourth and into the early third millennium BC, these entombment practices changed from (a) relatively small, roughly-hewn limestone tombs known as Hafit-type cairns to (b) Transitional tombs displaying features intermediary to both Hafit and Umm an-Nar period mortuary structures to (c) large, expertly-constructed Umm an-Nar communal tombs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Khalid Khalfan Al Wihaibi

This article discusses the major geographical and administrative divisions of Oman and their villages and the borders between these divisions, according to Arabic and Omani primary sources, from the first century of the Hijra to the end of the ninth century of the Hijra. This study is an attempt to establish a good knowledge of historical geography of Oman in the Islamic Medieval era.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document