scholarly journals Cecidophyopsis mites and blackcurrant reversion virus on Ribes hosts: current scientific progress and knowledge gaps

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inga Moročko‐Bičevska ◽  
Arturs Stalažs ◽  
Gunārs Lācis ◽  
Valda Laugale ◽  
Ina Baļķe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Progress ◽  
Knowledge Gaps ◽  
Reversion Virus

Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Białek
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Scientific Progress ◽  
The Public ◽  
Psychological Science

AbstractIf we want psychological science to have a meaningful real-world impact, it has to be trusted by the public. Scientific progress is noisy; accordingly, replications sometimes fail even for true findings. We need to communicate the acceptability of uncertainty to the public and our peers, to prevent psychology from being perceived as having nothing to say about reality.

Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexa M. Tullett ◽  
Simine Vazire
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Progress ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Jigsaw Puzzle ◽  
Replication Research

AbstractWe contest the “building a wall” analogy of scientific progress. We argue that this analogy unfairly privileges original research (which is perceived as laying bricks and, therefore, constructive) over replication research (which is perceived as testing and removing bricks and, therefore, destructive). We propose an alternative analogy for scientific progress: solving a jigsaw puzzle.

Patients' Knowledge Gaps May Hamper Breast Ca Follow-Up

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
SUSAN LONDON
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Gaps

Scientific Progress in Psi?

1982 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 548-548
Author(s):  
Victor A. Benassi
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Progress

Knowledge Gaps in Postpartum BP Management

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
MIRIAM E. TUCKER
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Gaps

“Bridging Gaps – Improving Outcomes”: Problem domains in schizophrenia research, treatment and policy

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 118-120
Author(s):  
W. Wölwer ◽  
W. Gaebel ◽  
V. Toeller
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Knowledge Gaps ◽  
Everyday Clinical Practice ◽  
Treatment Gaps ◽  
Different Types

Summary Background: The provision of mental healthcare for patients with schizophrenia is still characterized both by knowledge gaps and by treatment gaps in everyday clinical practice. Aim: This article discusses the different types of treatment gaps in schizophrenia and describes actions taken to overcome these gaps especially in Europe.

Roles of externalisation activities in the design process

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Maral Babapour Chafi
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Physical Models ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Knowledge Gaps ◽  
Design Processes ◽  
Digital Modelling

Designers engage in various activities, dealing with different materials and media to externalise and represent their form ideas. This paper presents a review of design research literature regarding externalisation activities in design process: sketching, building physical models and digital modelling. The aim has been to review research on the roles of media and representations in design processes, and highlight knowledge gaps and questions for future research.

Race on Both Sides of the Razor

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence D. Keel
Keyword(s):  
Social Constructionism ◽  
Political Correctness ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Genetic Research ◽  
Scientific Progress ◽  
Social Constructionist ◽  
Behavioral Differences ◽  
Social Activists ◽  
Continued Use ◽  
Biological Differences

The proliferation of studies declaring that there is a genetic basis to health disparities and behavioral differences across the so-called races has encouraged the opponents of social constructionism to assert a victory for scientific progress over political correctness. I am not concerned in this essay with providing a response to critics who believe races are expressions of innate genetic or biological differences. Instead, I am interested in how genetic research on human differences has divided social constructionists over whether the race concept in science can be used for social justice and redressing embodied forms of discrimination. On one side, there is the position that race is an inherently flawed concept and that its continued use by scientists, medical professionals, and even social activists keeps alive the notion that it has a biological basis. On the other side of this debate are those who maintain a social constructionist position yet argue that not all instances of race in science stem from discriminatory politics or the desire to prove that humans belong to discrete biological units that can then be classified as superior or inferior. I would like to shift this debate away from the question of whether race is real and move instead toward thinking about the intellectual commitments necessary for science to expose past legacies of discrimination.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document