Ready! Set! Go! An Action Research Agenda for Software Architecture Research

Author(s):  
Henrik Baerbak Christensen ◽  
Klaus Marius Hansen ◽  
Kari Rye Schougaard
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-153
Author(s):  
Rudi Saprudin Darwis

This paper will describe the action research as one of the alternative method of study and action research in community empowerment. Action research is based on the assumption that the research agenda should be linked with changes in society. Action research is not only to obtain the truth alone, but also to create conditions that are expected. Action research can be used effectively in the study of community empowerment and action given the characteristics of the importance of active citizen participation. Through action research it can be derived a formula according to the condition of society in its efforts to empower the community. Tulisan ini akan menguraikan tentang action research (penelitian tindakan) sebagai salah satu alternatif metode penelitian dalam studi dan aksi pemberdayaan masyarakat. Penelitian tindakan didasarkan kepada asumsi bahwa penelitian harus dihubungkan dengan agenda perubahan dalam masyarakat. Penelitian tindakan dilakukan tidak hanya untuk memperolehkebenaran semata namun juga menciptakan kondisi yang diharapkan. Penelitian tindakan dapat digunakan secara efektif dalam kajian maupun aksi pemberdayaan masyarakat mengingat karakteristiknya yang mementingkan partisipasi warga masyarakat secara aktif. Melalui penelitian tindakan akan dapat dihasilkan formula yang sesuai dengan kondisi masyarakat dalam melakukan upaya pemberdayaan masyarakat.


2020 ◽  
pp. 004208592093334
Author(s):  
Brittney V. Williams ◽  
Robert J. Jagers

The potential for transformative social and emotional learning (SEL) was conceptualized as a lever in service of equity. This article explains the next steps and working assumptions the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) has employed to collectively address the inequities that exist in schools. The proposed research agenda has implications for the continuous improvement of various resources. It also supports the formation of research–practice partnerships that will work to find frameworks, spaces, and stakeholder groups that will journey to implement and promote relevant efforts needed to create equitable learning environments where youth can excel.


2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 1278-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul H Gross ◽  
Amy F Bailes ◽  
Susan D Horn ◽  
Edward A Hurvitz ◽  
Jacob Kean ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Dalton-Puffer ◽  
Ute Smit

While Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has received a considerable amount of research interest lately, its increasing popularity as an approach to teaching content subjects in a foreign language requires concerted investigation that reflects and recognises its fundamentally contextualised nature. In this contribution, we sketch various tasks that require localised, often action research, covering a range of areas highly relevant to CLIL realities, but so far underrepresented in the literature. These are, firstly, policy issues, comprising policy statements as well as stakeholders’ perceptions of CLIL and its success; secondly, classroom discourse as the prime site for the investigation of CLIL practices and their implications for the learning process; and, thirdly, classroom pedagogy, with the focus on potential differences between CLIL and non-CLIL settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 100002
Author(s):  
Aijaz A. Shaikh ◽  
Ravishankar Sharma ◽  
Heikki Karjaluoto

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Oliver Westerwinter

Abstract Friedrich Kratochwil engages critically with the emergence of a global administrative law and its consequences for the democratic legitimacy of global governance. While he makes important contributions to our understanding of global governance, he does not sufficiently discuss the differences in the institutional design of new forms of global law-making and their consequences for the effectiveness and legitimacy of global governance. I elaborate on these limitations and outline a comparative research agenda on the emergence, design, and effectiveness of the diverse arrangements that constitute the complex institutional architecture of contemporary global governance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document