The Hand is Slower than the Eye: A Quantitative Exploration of Visual Dominance over Proprioception

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Burns ◽  
S. Razzaque ◽  
A.T. Panter ◽  
M.C. Whitton ◽  
M.R. McCallus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Dominance

Investigating visual dominance with a virtual driving task

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz Alshaer ◽  
Holger Regenbrecht ◽  
David O'Hare
Keyword(s):  
Visual Dominance ◽  
Driving Task

scholarly journals Stimulus Onset Modulates Auditory and Visual Dominance

Vision ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Margeaux Ciraolo ◽  
Samantha O’Hanlon ◽  
Christopher Robinson ◽  
Scott Sinnett
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Stimulus ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Visual Dominance ◽  
Visual Modality ◽  
Variable Stimulus ◽  
Two Measures ◽  
Auditory Dominance ◽  
Sensory Dominance

Investigations of multisensory integration have demonstrated that, under certain conditions, one modality is more likely to dominate the other. While the direction of this relationship typically favors the visual modality, the effect can be reversed to show auditory dominance under some conditions. The experiments presented here use an oddball detection paradigm with variable stimulus timings to test the hypothesis that a stimulus that is presented earlier will be processed first and therefore contribute to sensory dominance. Additionally, we compared two measures of sensory dominance (slowdown scores and error rate) to determine whether the type of measure used can affect which modality appears to dominate. When stimuli were presented asynchronously, analysis of slowdown scores and error rates yielded the same result; for both the 1- and 3-button versions of the task, participants were more likely to show auditory dominance when the auditory stimulus preceded the visual stimulus, whereas evidence for visual dominance was observed as the auditory stimulus was delayed. In contrast, for the simultaneous condition, slowdown scores indicated auditory dominance, whereas error rates indicated visual dominance. Overall, these results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that the modality that engages processing first is more likely to show dominance, and suggest that more explicit measures of sensory dominance may favor the visual modality.

scholarly journals Reversing the Colavita visual dominance effect

2011 ◽  
Vol 214 (4) ◽  
pp. 607-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Kim Ngo ◽  
Michelle L. Cadieux ◽  
Scott Sinnett ◽  
Salvador Soto-Faraco ◽  
Charles Spence
Keyword(s):  
Dominance Effect ◽  
Visual Dominance ◽  
Visual Dominance Effect

scholarly journals VISUAL DOMINANCE IN THE PIGEON

1978 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Randich ◽  
R. M. Klein ◽  
V. M. LoLordo
Keyword(s):  
Visual Dominance

When vision ‘extinguishes’ touch in neurologically-normal people: extending the Colavita visual dominance effect

2008 ◽  
Vol 186 (4) ◽  
pp. 643-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jess Hartcher-O’Brien ◽  
Alberto Gallace ◽  
Benedikt Krings ◽  
Camille Koppen ◽  
Charles Spence
Keyword(s):  
Dominance Effect ◽  
Visual Dominance ◽  
Normal People ◽  
Neurologically Normal ◽  
Visual Dominance Effect

Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect

2007 ◽  
Vol 184 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Koppen ◽  
Agnès Alsius ◽  
Charles Spence
Keyword(s):  
Dominance Effect ◽  
Visual Dominance ◽  
Semantic Congruency ◽  
Visual Dominance Effect
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document