A micromachine high frequency ultrasound scanner using photolithographic fabrication

2002 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 947-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Zara ◽  
S.W. Smith
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
High Frequency Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Scanner ◽  
Frequency Ultrasound

Assessment of Buccal Bone Surrounding Dental Implants Using a High-Frequency Ultrasound Scanner

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1427-1434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Bohner ◽  
Daniel Habor ◽  
Pedro Tortamano ◽  
Klaus Radermacher ◽  
Stefan Wolfart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
High Frequency Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Scanner ◽  
Frequency Ultrasound

scholarly journals Scanning of a Dental Implant with a High-Frequency Ultrasound Scanner: A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5494
Author(s):  
Lauren Bohner ◽  
Daniel Habor ◽  
Klaus Radermacher ◽  
Stefan Wolfart ◽  
Juliana Marotti
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implant ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Mean Deviation ◽  
High Frequency Ultrasound ◽  
Intraoral Scanner ◽  
Reference Dataset ◽  
Optical Scanners ◽  
Aperture Diameter ◽  
Ultrasound Scanner ◽  
Frequency Ultrasound

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the trueness of a dental implant scanned using an intraoral high-frequency ultrasound prototype and compared with conventional optical scanners. An acrylic resin cast containing a dental implant at position 11 was scanned with a fringe projection 3D sensor for use as a reference dataset. The same cast was scanned 10 times for each group. Ultrasound scanning was performed with a high-frequency probe (42 MHz, aperture diameter of 4 mm and focus length of 8 mm), and 3D images were reconstructed based on the depth of each surface point echo. Optical scans were performed in a laboratory and with an intraoral scanner. A region of interest consisting of the dental implant site was segmented and matched to the reference dataset. Trueness was defined as the closeness between experimental data and the reference surface. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests with a significance level of p = 0.05. No statistical difference was found among the evaluated scanners. The mean deviation error was 57.40 ± 17.44 µm for the ultrasound scanner, 75.40 ± 41.43 µm for the laboratory scanner and 38.55 ± 24.34 µm for the intraoral scanner. The high-frequency ultrasound scanner showed similar trueness to optical scanners for digital implant impression.

Accuracy of High-Frequency Ultrasound Scanner in Detecting Peri-implant Bone Defects

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 650-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Bohner ◽  
Daniel Habor ◽  
Felix Gremse ◽  
Pedro Tortamano ◽  
Stefan Wolfart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
High Frequency Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Scanner ◽  
Frequency Ultrasound
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document