scholarly journals On the High-SNR Conditional Maximum-Likelihood Estimator Full Statistical Characterization

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 4840-4843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Renaux ◽  
Philippe Forster ◽  
Eric Chaumette ◽  
Pascal Larzabal
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Statistical Characterization ◽  
Conditional Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Conditional Maximum

THE INFORMATION BOUND OF A DYNAMIC PANEL LOGIT MODEL WITH FIXED EFFECTS

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 913-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinyong Hahn
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Dynamic Panel Data ◽  
Consistent Estimator ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Dynamic Panel ◽  
Conditional Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Information Bound ◽  
Conditional Maximum

In this paper, I calculate the semiparametric information bound in two dynamic panel data logit models with individual specific effects. In such a model without any other regressors, it is well known that the conditional maximum likelihood estimator yields a √n-consistent estimator. In the case where the model includes strictly exogenous continuous regressors, Honoré and Kyriazidou (2000, Econometrica 68, 839–874) suggest a consistent estimator whose rate of convergence is slower than √n. Information bounds calculated in this paper suggest that the conditional maximum likelihood estimator is not efficient for models without any other regressor and that √n-consistent estimation is infeasible in more general models.

The Comparison Between the Bayes Estimator and the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of the Reliability Function for Negative Exponential Distribution

2018 ◽  
pp. 439
Author(s):  
Hazim Mansour Gorgees ◽  
Bushra Abdualrasool Ali ◽  
Raghad Ibrahim Kathum
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Exponential Distribution ◽  
Reliability Function ◽  
Bayes Estimator ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Monte Carlo Simulation Technique ◽  
Negative Exponential Distribution ◽  
Negative Exponential ◽  
Better Than

     In this paper, the maximum likelihood estimator and the Bayes estimator of the reliability function for negative exponential distribution has been derived, then a Monte –Carlo simulation technique was employed to compare the performance of such estimators. The integral mean square error (IMSE) was used as a criterion for this comparison. The simulation results displayed that the Bayes estimator performed better than the maximum likelihood estimator for different samples sizes.

scholarly journals Transforming variables to central normality

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Raymaekers ◽  
Peter J. Rousseeuw
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Simulation Study ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Transformation Parameter ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Extensive Simulation ◽  
Highly Sensitive

AbstractMany real data sets contain numerical features (variables) whose distribution is far from normal (Gaussian). Instead, their distribution is often skewed. In order to handle such data it is customary to preprocess the variables to make them more normal. The Box–Cox and Yeo–Johnson transformations are well-known tools for this. However, the standard maximum likelihood estimator of their transformation parameter is highly sensitive to outliers, and will often try to move outliers inward at the expense of the normality of the central part of the data. We propose a modification of these transformations as well as an estimator of the transformation parameter that is robust to outliers, so the transformed data can be approximately normal in the center and a few outliers may deviate from it. It compares favorably to existing techniques in an extensive simulation study and on real data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document