scholarly journals Conductive microbead array detection by high-frequency eddy-current testing technique with SV-GMR sensor

2005 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 3622-3624 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Yamada ◽  
K. Chomsuwan ◽  
T. Hagino ◽  
H. Tian ◽  
K. Minamide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Eddy Current Testing ◽  
Testing Technique ◽  
Current Testing ◽  
Array Detection ◽  
Gmr Sensor ◽  
Microbead Array

scholarly journals GMR Sensor Utilization for PCB Inspection Based on the Eddy-Current Testing Technique

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Chomsuwan ◽  
Y. Fukuda ◽  
S. Yamada ◽  
M. Iwahara ◽  
H. Wakiwaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
Eddy Current Testing ◽  
Testing Technique ◽  
Current Testing ◽  
Gmr Sensor

scholarly journals Evaluation of Coating Thickness Using Lift-Off Insensitivity of Eddy Current Sensor

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 419
Author(s):  
Xiaobai Meng ◽  
Mingyang Lu ◽  
Wuliang Yin ◽  
Abdeldjalil Bennecer ◽  
Katherine J. Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
Coating Thickness ◽  
Thickness Measurement ◽  
Eddy Current Testing ◽  
Thickness Variation ◽  
Testing Technique ◽  
Current Testing ◽  
Thin Skin ◽  
Embedded Algorithms ◽  
Lift Off

Defect detection in ferromagnetic substrates is often hampered by nonmagnetic coating thickness variation when using conventional eddy current testing technique. The lift-off distance between the sample and the sensor is one of the main obstacles for the thickness measurement of nonmagnetic coatings on ferromagnetic substrates when using the eddy current testing technique. Based on the eddy current thin-skin effect and the lift-off insensitive inductance (LII), a simplified iterative algorithm is proposed for reducing the lift-off variation effect using a multifrequency sensor. Compared to the previous techniques on compensating the lift-off error (e.g., the lift-off point of intersection) while retrieving the thickness, the simplified inductance algorithms avoid the computation burden of integration, which are used as embedded algorithms for the online retrieval of lift-offs via each frequency channel. The LII is determined by the dimension and geometry of the sensor, thus eliminating the need for empirical calibration. The method is validated by means of experimental measurements of the inductance of coatings with different materials and thicknesses on ferrous substrates (dual-phase alloy). The error of the calculated coating thickness has been controlled to within 3% for an extended lift-off range of up to 10 mm.

Eddy Current Testing Probe Based on Double-Coil Excitation and GMR Sensor

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1533-1542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Bernieri ◽  
Luigi Ferrigno ◽  
Marco Laracca ◽  
Antonio Rasile
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
Eddy Current Testing ◽  
Current Testing ◽  
Gmr Sensor

scholarly journals Defect detection in conducting materials using eddy current testing techniques

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut Brauer ◽  
Marek Ziolkowski ◽  
Hannes Toepfer
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
Eddy Current Testing ◽  
Internal Defects ◽  
Testing Technique ◽  
Defect Identification ◽  
Testing Conditions ◽  
Current Testing ◽  
Conducting Materials ◽  
Testing Techniques ◽  
Electrical Conductors

Lorentz force eddy current testing (LET) is a novel nondestructive testing technique which can be applied preferably to the identification of internal defects in nonmagnetic moving conductors. The LET is compared (similar testing conditions) with the classical eddy current testing (ECT). Numerical FEM simulations have been performed to analyze the measurements as well as the identification of internal defects in nonmagnetic conductors. The results are compared with measurements to test the feasibility of defect identification. Finally, the use of LET measurements to estimate of the electrical conductors under test are described as well.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Coating Thickness Using Lift-Off Insensitivity of Eddy Current Sensor

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaobai Meng ◽  
Mingyang Lu ◽  
Wuliang Yin ◽  
Abdeldjalil Bennecer ◽  
Katherine Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
Coating Thickness ◽  
Thickness Measurement ◽  
Eddy Current Testing ◽  
Thickness Variation ◽  
Testing Technique ◽  
Current Testing ◽  
Thin Skin ◽  
Embedded Algorithms ◽  
Lift Off

Defect detection in ferromagnetic substrates is often hampered by non-magnetic coating thickness variation when using conventional eddy current testing technique. The lift-off distance between the sample and the sensor is one of the main obstacles for the thickness measurement of non-magnetic coatings on ferromagnetic substrates when using the eddy current testing technique. Based on the eddy current thin-skin effect and the lift-off insensitive inductance (LII), a simplified iterative algorithm is proposed for reducing the lift-off variation effect using a multi-frequency sensor. Compared to the previous techniques on compensating the lift-off error (e.g., the lift-off point of intersection) while retrieving the thickness, the simplified inductance algorithms avoid the computation burden of integration, which are used as embedded algorithms for the online retrieval of lift-offs via each frequency channel. The LII is determined by the dimension and geometry of the sensor, thus eliminating the need for empirical calibration. The method is validated by means of experimental measurements of the inductance of coatings with different materials and thicknesses on ferrous substrates (dual-phase alloy). The error of the calculated coating thickness has been controlled to within 3 % for an extended lift-off range of up to 10 mm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document