A Methodical Assessment of Integrative Model-Based E-Course Development

2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 605-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.P. Mudur ◽  
P. Gharpure ◽  
P. Rajan
1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
TIMOTHY W. BUTLER ◽  
KIRK R. KARWAN ◽  
JAMES R. SWEIGART ◽  
GARY R. REEVES

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 1509-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Kukanja ◽  
Doris Gomezelj Omerzel ◽  
Borut Kodrič

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1327-1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Kormaksson ◽  
James G. Booth ◽  
Maria E. Figueroa ◽  
Ari Melnick

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 425-434
Author(s):  
Aleksander Buczacki

Abstract An effective and efficient New Product Development (NPD) and implementation process is crucial for creation of competitive advantage for each company. Due to this fact, companies are more and more often looking for methods and tools for improvement of NPD processes. The paper deals with an integrated Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) and lean approach to NPD. The individual stages of the NPD process are predisposed to different degrees to the use of MBSE and Lean. The research conducted shows that the use of advanced MBSE and lean tools and techniques in the development of new products is not widespread. There is a room for future research.


Religions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Leandro M. Gaitán ◽  
Javier S. Castresana

This article examines the basic and dialogical models of neurotheology and suggests a third model based on the work of Aldous Huxley. In other words, this proposal is not limited to understanding this discipline as a mere pursuit of neural correlates or as a dialogue between neuroscience and theology. Instead, it is the search for an integrative understanding of religious experiences in which the study of neuronal correlates is only one of the multilevels to be integrated within the framework of a plural and conveniently articulated explanation of such phenomena. This model, which we call integrative neurotheology, hopes to achieve knowledge of religious experiences that includes a comprehensive range of disciplines. In order to update and give argumentative consistency to this model, we will use philosopher Sandra D. Mitchell’s theory of integrative pluralism, which is a more epistemologically refined expression of Huxley’s intuitions. We conclude that a comprehensive model is feasible although we are aware that this article cannot give answers to all the difficulties that this model possesses. Nevertheless, we expect to open up a new pathway in the studies of religious experience.


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. e78-e78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Logan J. Everett ◽  
Shane T. Jensen ◽  
Sridhar Hannenhalli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document