Space charge and dielectric response in polar fluids

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-400
Author(s):  
A.B. Szymanski
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1532-1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingyu Wang ◽  
Zongren Peng ◽  
S. J. Dodd ◽  
L. A. Dissado ◽  
N. M. Chalashkanov

1987 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 1272-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger F. Loring ◽  
Shaul Mukamel

2017 ◽  
Vol 111 (9) ◽  
pp. 092901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong-Hui Shen ◽  
Jian-Jun Wang ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Yuanhua Lin ◽  
Ce-Wen Nan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vinayak P. Dravid ◽  
V. Ravikumar ◽  
Richard Plass

With the advent of coherent electron sources with cold field emission guns (cFEGs), it has become possible to utilize the coherent interference phenomenon and perform “practical” electron holography. Historically, holography was envisioned to extent the resolution limit by compensating coherent aberrations. Indeed such work has been done with reasonable success in a few laboratories around the world. However, it is the ability of electron holography to map electrical and magnetic fields which has caught considerable attention of materials science community.There has been considerable theoretical work on formation of space charge on surfaces and internal interfaces. In particular, formation and nature of space charge have important implications for the performance of numerous electroceramics which derive their useful properties from electrically active grain boundaries. Bonnell and coworkers, in their elegant STM experiments provided the direct evidence for GB space charge and its sign, while Chiang et al. used the indirect but powerful technique of x-ray microchemical profiling across GBs to infer the nature of space charge.


1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 503-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Warner ◽  
M. E. Cates
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 137-139
Author(s):  
Y. Takahashi ◽  
T. Hasegawa ◽  
T. Akutagawa ◽  
T. Nakamura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document