Development and Validation of a Hybrid Nuss Procedure Surgical Simulator and Trainer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Mohammad F. Obeid ◽  
Robert E. Kelly ◽  
Frederic D. Mckenzie
Keyword(s):  
Nuss Procedure ◽  
Surgical Simulator ◽  
Development And Validation

scholarly journals Development and validation methodology of the Nuss procedure surgical planner

SIMULATION ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 1474-1488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof J Rechowicz ◽  
Frederic D McKenzie
Keyword(s):  
Nuss Procedure ◽  
Development And Validation

scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Mixed Reality Configuration of a Simulator for a Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Using the Workspace of a Haptic Device and Simulator Users

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Sneha Patel ◽  
Sami Alkadri ◽  
Mark Driscoll
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Reality ◽  
Tactile Feedback ◽  
Haptic Device ◽  
Surgical Simulator ◽  
Surgical Simulators ◽  
Workspace Analysis ◽  
User Data ◽  
Minimally Invasive Spine ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Bench Model

Most surgical simulators leverage virtual or bench models to simulate reality. This study proposes and validates a method for workspace configuration of a surgical simulator which utilizes a haptic device for interaction with a virtual model and a bench model to provide additional tactile feedback based on planned surgical manoeuvers. Numerical analyses were completed to determine the workspace and position of a haptic device, relative to the bench model, used in the surgical simulator, and the determined configuration was validated using device limitations and user data from surgical and nonsurgical users. For the validation, surgeons performed an identical surgery on a cadaver prior to using the simulator, and their trajectories were then compared to the determined workspace for the haptic device. The configuration of the simulator was determined appropriate through workspace analysis and the collected user trajectories. Statistical analyses suggest differences in trajectories between the participating surgeons which were not affected by the imposed haptic workspace. This study, therefore, demonstrates a method to optimally position a haptic device with respect to a bench model while meeting the manoeuverability needs of a surgical procedure. The validation method identified workspace position and user trajectory towards ideal configuration of a mixed reality simulator.

Development and Validation of a High-Fidelity Porcine Laryngeal Surgical Simulator

2015 ◽  
Vol 153 (3) ◽  
pp. 420-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Dedmon ◽  
Paul M. Paddle ◽  
Jeananne Phillips ◽  
Leo Kobayashi ◽  
Ramon A. Franco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Fidelity ◽  
Surgical Simulator ◽  
Development And Validation

An initial evaluation of the Iowa Dental Surgical Simulator

2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 847-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Johnson ◽  
G Thomas ◽  
S Dow ◽  
C Stanford
Keyword(s):  
Initial Evaluation ◽  
Surgical Simulator

18: Measuring Quality-of-Life after Surgery: Development and Validation of the Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation (CARE)

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
J. Stuart Wolf ◽  
Rodney L. Dunn ◽  
Martin G. Sanda ◽  
David P. Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Development And Validation

Development of the Teacher Attitudes Towards Self-Regulated Learning Scale

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Steinbach ◽  
Heidrun Stoeger
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Primary School ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
Affective Component ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
Teachers Attitudes ◽  
Development And Validation

Abstract. We describe the development and validation of an instrument for measuring the affective component of primary school teachers’ attitudes towards self-regulated learning. The questionnaire assesses the affective component towards those cognitive and metacognitive strategies that are especially effective in primary school. In a first study (n = 230), the factor structure was verified via an exploratory factor analysis. A confirmatory factor analysis with data from a second study (n = 400) indicated that the theoretical factor structure is appropriate. A comparison with four alternative models identified the theoretically derived factor structure as the most appropriate. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by correlations with a scale that measures the degree to which teachers create learning environments that enable students to self-regulate their learning. Retrospective validity was demonstrated by correlations with a scale that measures teachers’ experiences with self-regulated learning. In a third study (n = 47), the scale’s concurrent validity was tested with scales measuring teachers’ evaluation of the desirability of different aspects of self-regulated learning in class. Additionally, predictive validity was demonstrated via a binary logistic regression, with teachers attitudes as predictor on their registration for a workshop on self-regulated learning and their willingness to implement a seven-week training program on self-regulated learning.

Development and Validation of a German Language Unit-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) Scale

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 852-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Gunnesch-Luca ◽  
Klaus Moser
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Organizational Citizenship ◽  
Organizational Citizenship Behavior ◽  
Helping Behavior ◽  
Citizenship Behavior ◽  
German Language ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Unit Level ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Development And Validation

Abstract. The current paper presents the development and validation of a unit-level Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) scale based on the Referent-Shift Consensus Model (RSCM). In Study 1, with 124 individuals measured twice, both an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) established and confirmed a five-factor solution (helping behavior, sportsmanship, loyalty, civic virtue, and conscientiousness). Test–retest reliabilities at a 2-month interval were high (between .59 and .79 for the subscales, .83 for the total scale). In Study 2, unit-level OCB was analyzed in a sample of 129 work teams. Both Interrater Reliability (IRR) measures and Interrater Agreement (IRA) values provided support for RSCM requirements. Finally, unit-level OCB was associated with group task interdependence and was more predictable (by job satisfaction and integrity of the supervisor) than individual-level OCB in previous research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document