Discontinuous Galerkin Inspired Framework for Vector Generalized Finite-Element Methods

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 1339-1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Tuncer ◽  
B. Shanker ◽  
L. C. Kempel
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Discontinuous Galerkin ◽  
Finite Element Methods ◽  
Generalized Finite Element

scholarly journals Analysis of the SBP-SAT Stabilization for Finite Element Methods Part I: Linear Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Abgrall ◽  
J. Nordström ◽  
P. Öffner ◽  
S. Tokareva
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Discontinuous Galerkin ◽  
Finite Element Methods ◽  
Main Idea ◽  
Galerkin Methods ◽  
Exact Integration ◽  
Galerkin Scheme ◽  
Continuous Galerkin ◽  
Continuous Galerkin Methods

AbstractIn the hyperbolic community, discontinuous Galerkin (DG) approaches are mainly applied when finite element methods are considered. As the name suggested, the DG framework allows a discontinuity at the element interfaces, which seems for many researchers a favorable property in case of hyperbolic balance laws. On the contrary, continuous Galerkin methods appear to be unsuitable for hyperbolic problems and there exists still the perception that continuous Galerkin methods are notoriously unstable. To remedy this issue, stabilization terms are usually added and various formulations can be found in the literature. However, this perception is not true and the stabilization terms are unnecessary, in general. In this paper, we deal with this problem, but present a different approach. We use the boundary conditions to stabilize the scheme following a procedure that are frequently used in the finite difference community. Here, the main idea is to impose the boundary conditions weakly and specific boundary operators are constructed such that they guarantee stability. This approach has already been used in the discontinuous Galerkin framework, but here we apply it with a continuous Galerkin scheme. No internal dissipation is needed even if unstructured grids are used. Further, we point out that we do not need exact integration, it suffices if the quadrature rule and the norm in the differential operator are the same, such that the summation-by-parts property is fulfilled meaning that a discrete Gauss Theorem is valid. This contradicts the perception in the hyperbolic community that stability issues for pure Galerkin scheme exist. In numerical simulations, we verify our theoretical analysis.

scholarly journals Survey of meshless and generalized finite element methods: A unified approach

Acta Numerica ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivo Babuška ◽  
Uday Banerjee ◽  
John E. Osborn
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Finite Element Methods ◽  
Mesh Generation ◽  
Variational Principles ◽  
Meshless Methods ◽  
Nonlinear Pdes ◽  
Time Step ◽  
Complicated Geometry ◽  
Generalized Finite Element ◽  
Selection Of

In the past few years meshless methods for numerically solving partial differential equations have come into the focus of interest, especially in the engineering community. This class of methods was essentially stimulated by difficulties related to mesh generation. Mesh generation is delicate in many situations, for instance, when the domain has complicated geometry; when the mesh changes with time, as in crack propagation, and remeshing is required at each time step; when a Lagrangian formulation is employed, especially with nonlinear PDEs. In addition, the need for flexibility in the selection of approximating functions (e.g., the flexibility to use non-polynomial approximating functions), has played a significant role in the development of meshless methods. There are many recent papers, and two books, on meshless methods; most of them are of an engineering character, without any mathematical analysis.In this paper we address meshless methods and the closely related generalized finite element methods for solving linear elliptic equations, using variational principles. We give a unified mathematical theory with proofs, briefly address implementational aspects, present illustrative numerical examples, and provide a list of references to the current literature.The aim of the paper is to provide a survey of a part of this new field, with emphasis on mathematics. We present proofs of essential theorems because we feel these proofs are essential for the understanding of the mathematical aspects of meshless methods, which has approximation theory as a major ingredient. As always, any new field is stimulated by and related to older ideas. This will be visible in our paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document