Boundary Effects on the Determination of Metamaterial Parameters From Normal Incidence Reflection and Transmission Measurements

2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 2226-2240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Kim ◽  
Edward F. Kuester ◽  
Christopher L. Holloway ◽  
Aaron D. Scher ◽  
James Baker-Jarvis
1975 ◽  
Vol 53 (18) ◽  
pp. 1737-1742 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Wohlgemuth ◽  
D. E. Brodie

A new method for determining the index of refraction from normal incidence reflection and transmission measurements has been developed. Several other methods are reviewed to explain why a new method is needed. The author's method used a thickness variational approach. For an accurate determination of n and k, the method requires normal incidence reflection and transmission measurements over a fairly broad spectral range for at least two different film thicknesses. These requirements are unavoidable for normal incidence methods.


1986 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. T. Pereira ◽  
P. K. Banerjee ◽  
S. S. Mitra

ABSTRACTAmorphous thin films of SixGe1-x:O (x = 0.70) were prepared by RF-sputtering at several substrate temperatures. The structural properties of these films were studied by IR spectroscopy and revealed features characteristic of hydrogen and/or oxygen bonded to silicon. The optical constants (n,k) were determined from reflection and transmission measurements at near-normal incidence for photon energies in the range of 1 eV and 2.6 eV. The optical gap was derived from the Taue plot and correlated with the composition of the samples. The increase of hydrogen and/or oxygen decreases the value of the refractive index and increases the optical gap.


1978 ◽  
Vol 1 (16) ◽  
pp. 129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole Secher Madsen ◽  
Paisal Shusang ◽  
Sue Ann Hanson

In a previous paper Madsen and White (1977) developed an approximate method for the determination of reflection and transmission characteristics of multi-layered, porous rubble-mound breakwaters of trapezoidal cross-section. This approximate method was based on the assumption that the energy dissipation associated with the wave-structure interaction could be considered as two separate mechanisms: (1) an external, frictional dissipation on the seaward slope; (2) an internal dissipation within the porous structure. The external dissipation on the seaward slope was evaluated from the semi-theoretical analysis of energy dissipation on rough, impermeable slopes developed by Madsen and White (1975). The remaining wave energy was represented by an equivalent wave incident on a hydraulically equivalent porous breakwater of rectangular cross-section. The partitioning of the remaining wave energy among reflected, transmitted and internally dissipated energy was evaluated as described by Madsen (1974), leading to a determination of the reflection and transmission coefficients of the structure. The advantage of this previous approximate method was its ease of use. Input data requirements were limited to quantities which would either be known (water depth, wave characteristics, breakwater geometry, and stone sizes) or could be estimated (porosity) by the design engineer. This feature was achieved by the employment of empirical relationships for the parameterization of the external and internal energy dissipation mechanisms. General solutions were presented in graphical form so that calculations could proceed using no more sophisticated equipment than a hand calculator (or a slide rule). This simple method gave estimates of transmission coefficients in excellent agreement with laboratory measurements whereas its ability to predict reflection coefficients left a lot to be desired.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document