Automated labeling of electroencephalography data using quasi-supervised learning

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basak Esin Kokturk ◽  
Bilge Karacali
Keyword(s):  
Supervised Learning ◽  
Automated Labeling

Unsupervised Bug Report Categorization Using Clustering and Labeling Algorithm

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (07) ◽  
pp. 1027-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nachai Limsettho ◽  
Hideaki Hata ◽  
Akito Monden ◽  
Kenichi Matsumoto
Keyword(s):  
Supervised Learning ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Grammatical Structure ◽  
Bug Reports ◽  
Bug Report ◽  
Labeling Algorithm ◽  
Crucial Information ◽  
Labeling Approach ◽  
Natural Language Process ◽  
Automated Labeling

Bug reports are one of the most crucial information sources for software engineering offering answers to many questions. Yet, getting these answers is not always easy; the information in bug reports is often implicit and some processes are required to extract the meaning of these reports. Most research in this area employ a supervised learning approach to classify bug reports so that required types of reports could be identified. However, this approach often requires an immense amount of time and effort, the resources that already too scarce in many projects. We aim to develop an automated framework that can categorize bug reports, according to their grammatical structure without the need for labeled data. Our framework categorizes bug reports according to their text similarity using topic modeling and a clustering algorithm. Each group of bug reports are labeled with our new clustering labeling algorithm specifically made for clusters in the topic space. Our framework is highly customizable with a modular approach and options to incorporate available background knowledge to improve its performance, while our cluster labeling approach make use of natural language process (NLP) chunking to create the representative labels. Our experiment results demonstrate that the performance of our unsupervised framework is comparable to a supervised learning one. We also show that our labeling process is capable of labeling each cluster with phrases that are representative for that cluster's characteristics. Our framework can be used to automatically categorize the incoming bug reports without any prior knowledge, as an automated labeling suggestion system or as a tool for obtaining knowledge about the structure of the bug report repository.

A Supervised Learning Approach for Dynamic Sampling (SLADS) in Raman Hyperspectral Imaging

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (15) ◽  
pp. 132-1-1323
Author(s):  
Shijie Zhang ◽  
Zhengtian Song ◽  
G. M. Dilshan P. Godaliyadda ◽  
Dong Hye Ye ◽  
Atanu Sengupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supervised Learning ◽  
Hyperspectral Imaging ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Dynamic Sampling

Pembobotan Berdasarkan Tingkat Kesamaan Semantik pada Metode Fuzzy Semi-Supervised Co-Clustering untuk Pengelompokkan Dokumen Teks

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Galang Amanda Dwi P. ◽  
Gregorius Edwadr ◽  
Agus Zainal Arifin
Keyword(s):  
Supervised Learning ◽  
Semantic Similarity ◽  
The Other ◽  
Classification Result ◽  
Document Similarity ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Index Terms ◽  
Membership Value ◽  
Degree Of Similarity

Nowadays, a large number of information can not be reached by the reader because of the misclassification of text-based documents. The misclassified data can also make the readers obtain the wrong information. The method which is proposed by this paper is aiming to classify the documents into the correct group.  Each document will have a membership value in several different classes. The method will be used to find the degree of similarity between the two documents is the semantic similarity. In fact, there is no document that doesn’t have a relationship with the other but their relationship might be close to 0. This method calculates the similarity between two documents by taking into account the level of similarity of words and their synonyms. After all inter-document similarity values obtained, a matrix will be created. The matrix is then used as a semi-supervised factor. The output of this method is the value of the membership of each document, which must be one of the greatest membership value for each document which indicates where the documents are grouped. Classification result computed by the method shows a good value which is 90 %. Index Terms - Fuzzy co-clustering, Heuristic, Semantica Similiarity, Semi-supervised learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document