Wireless real-time gamma radiation dosimetry system using MgO and CeO/sub 21/ thick film capacitors

Author(s):  
K. Arshak ◽  
K. Kaneswaran ◽  
O. Korostynska ◽  
D. Morris ◽  
A. Arshak
2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.K. Maity ◽  
S.L. Sharma ◽  
G. Chourasiya

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 574-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Arshak ◽  
O. Korostynska

Author(s):  
Marcus Christian Müller ◽  
Michael Windemuth ◽  
Sophie Frege ◽  
Eva Nadine Striepens

Background: Chronic exposure to occupational ionising radiation is seen as one reason for elevated cancer prevalence. </P><P> Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate radiation exposure of anaesthetists by real-time dosimetry. Methods: Data of 296 patients were analyzed. Ten types of trauma operation procedures including osteosynthesis of upper and lower extremity fractures and minimally invasive stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures were accomplished. Evaluation was performed by an occupational dosimetry system, which visualises anaesthetists radiation exposure feedback compared to surgeons in real-time. Results: A significantly lower radiation exposure to anaesthetists compared to surgeons was observed in four types of operative procedures: Plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures, osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures, stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In four types of operations (plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral, distal radial and tibial fractures and intramedullary nailing of the clavicle), anaesthetists` amount of radiation exceeded one-third of the surgeons' exposure, especially if the C-arm tube was positioned close to the anaesthetists work station at the patients' head. Conclusion: By using the occupational radiation dose monitoring system, radiation exposure to anaesthetists was visualised in real-time during trauma operations. Radiation exposure of anaesthetists depends on the type of operation and the position of the C-arm. The system may help to increase anaesthetists` awareness concerning radiation exposure and to enhance compliance in using radiation protection techniques.


Author(s):  
R. M. Sahani ◽  
Raghav Singhal ◽  
Naresh Jinger ◽  
Manjeet Kulhar ◽  
Arun Pandya ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-133
Author(s):  
O. H. Mahajan ◽  
T. R. Joshi ◽  
K. S. V. Nambi ◽  
R. V. Joshi

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waheed Arshed ◽  
Khalid Mahmood ◽  
Ikramullah Qazi ◽  
Asad Ullah ◽  
Perveen Akhter ◽  
...  

An accurate calibration of the therapy level radiation dosimetry system has a pivotal role in the accuracy of dose delivery to cancer patients. The two methods used for obtaining a tissue equivalent calibration of the system: air kerma calibration and its conversion to a tissue equivalent value (absorbed dose to water) and direct calibration of the system in a water phantom, have been compared for identical irradiation geometry. It was found that the deviation between the two methods remained within a range of 0% to ?1.7% for the PTW UNIDOS dosimetry system. This means that although the recommended method is in-water calibration, under exceptional circumstances, in-air calibration may be used as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document