On the Threshold Region Mean-Squared Error Performance of Maximum-Likelihood Direction-of Arrival Estimation in the Presence of Signal Model Mismatch

Author(s):  
C.D. Richmond
2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (19) ◽  
pp. 4729-4739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua M. Kantor ◽  
Christ D. Richmond ◽  
Daniel W. Bliss ◽  
Bill Correll

Author(s):  
Nadia Hashim Al-Noor ◽  
Shurooq A.K. Al-Sultany

        In real situations all observations and measurements are not exact numbers but more or less non-exact, also called fuzzy. So, in this paper, we use approximate non-Bayesian computational methods to estimate inverse Weibull parameters and reliability function with fuzzy data. The maximum likelihood and moment estimations are obtained as non-Bayesian estimation. The maximum likelihood estimators have been derived numerically based on two iterative techniques namely “Newton-Raphson” and the “Expectation-Maximization” techniques. In addition, we provide compared numerically through Monte-Carlo simulation study to obtained estimates of the parameters and reliability function in terms of their mean squared error values and integrated mean squared error values respectively.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 143-150
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar Dhull

The direction of arrival estimation is the main key problem in array signal processing. In this paper, the alternating projection maximum Likelihood (AP-ML), Alternating projection sub space framework (APSSF) and ESPRIT algorithm are studied. The simulation is performed in MATLAB for single and multiple sources. The effect of the varying number of spacing between antenna elements, number of snapshots and SNR are studied. The performance comparison shows that ESPRIT algorithm performs better as compared to the AP-ML and AP-SSF. Key-Words: - AP-ML, AP-SSF, Direction of Arrival, ESPRIT, Snapshots, SNR


1988 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-307
Author(s):  
Wilfried R. Vanhonacker

Estimating autoregressive current effects models is not straightforward when observations are aggregated over time. The author evaluates a familiar iterative generalized least squares (IGLS) approach and contrasts it to a maximum likelihood (ML) approach. Analytic and numerical results suggest that (1) IGLS and ML provide good estimates for the response parameters in instances of positive serial correlation, (2) ML provides superior (in mean squared error) estimates for the serial correlation coefficient, and (3) IGLS might have difficulty in deriving parameter estimates in instances of negative serial correlation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document